|
fadam posted:The red flare seems very strong in Rograkh EDH decks at least, and maybe has applications in some 60-card combo decks. Black Flare seems kind of bad. *Innocent blood would have been a good add to modern and would have done more to help small creature decks than the fury ban ever could
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2024 14:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:13 |
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:The copies are not cast. You don't need to cast the copies - you never let the first copy trigger resolve, so the second copy trigger (and every subsequent copy) can keep copying it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2024 14:03
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:The copies are not cast. I'm only triggering the ability twice, each time with a real spell. After that it's just endless copies of the first trigger creating new copies of the first trigger (and everything else)
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2024 17:29
|
|
|
The white emrakul deck is incredibly dumb and I think I'm in love.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 00:58
|
|
|
 Ancient Cornucopia putting up good numbers at the PT and with 4x in a PTQ winning deck, another L for this thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 06:57
|
|
|
Thank goodness it's a mythic or it might have done worse
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 08:23
|
|
|
Why does the second half of https://scryfall.com/card/neo/21/invoke-justice still resolve if the target for the first part is removed before resolution? I thought normally if a spells target was removed before it resolves the whole thing fizzles, and it says "then" which makes it seem like the second part only happens after the first is played out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 14:22
|
|
|
distortion park posted:Why does the second half of https://scryfall.com/card/neo/21/invoke-justice still resolve if the target for the first part is removed before resolution? I thought normally if a spells target was removed before it resolves the whole thing fizzles, and it says "then" which makes it seem like the second part only happens after the first is played out. [edit] Yes (target player) MrL_JaKiri fucked around with this message at 14:32 on Apr 29, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 14:27
|
|
|
The spell has two targets, so if you remove one (the creature card), it still resolves the part regarding the other half (target player).
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 14:30
|
|
|
distortion park posted:Why does the second half of https://scryfall.com/card/neo/21/invoke-justice still resolve if the target for the first part is removed before resolution? I thought normally if a spells target was removed before it resolves the whole thing fizzles, and it says "then" which makes it seem like the second part only happens after the first is played out. The player is still a legal target, so that part still resolves.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 14:35
|
|
|
distortion park posted:
Lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 14:52
|
|
|
distortion park posted:
That's wild. Yoshi didn't run any Invasions in his Domain list and that worked out pretty good for him. The Topiary and Invasion ramp package was always the most awkward and vulnerable part of the domain list. It's cool seeing better magic players (than myself) doing something about it. For reference, Yoshi ran: 4 Topiary Stomper 2 Spelunking 1 Glimpse the Core 1 Cartographer's Survey Here's his entire list. kung fu jive fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Apr 29, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 15:22
|
|
|
distortion park posted:Why does the second half of https://scryfall.com/card/neo/21/invoke-justice still resolve if the target for the first part is removed before resolution? I thought normally if a spells target was removed before it resolves the whole thing fizzles, and it says "then" which makes it seem like the second part only happens after the first is played out. Only if all of a targets are removed does a spell fizzle. Also, the card tries to do as much as possible. If they wanted to make it so the second half only happened if the first half happened, they would stick an "if you do" somewhere in there. "Then" is just a way to clarify that things happen in the order written on the card. In this case it's there so players understand that you can put counters on the returned card. It doesn't make any actual difference whether it's there or not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 15:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:13 |
|
|
Dr. Stab posted:Only if all of a targets are removed does a spell fizzle. Also, the card tries to do as much as possible. If they wanted to make it so the second half only happened if the first half happened, they would stick an "if you do" somewhere in there. Thank you this explanation made sense to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2024 16:00
|
|