|
MourningView posted:The Iowa Hawkeyes will just have to continue to prove the Haters And Losers of the Irrelevant USA Today Coach's Poll wrong I'm on board with that. Also on board with FSU being a legit bottom 10 team. And with that my weekly moon poll pre:Delta Team Record Score +1 1. Iowa 3-0 2.8887 -1 2. Penn State 3-0 2.6946 +1 3. Texas A&M 3-0 2.4300 +6 4. Michigan 3-0 2.3093 +9 5. Arkansas 3-0 2.1809 -1 6. Alabama 3-0 2.0351 +2 7. Georgia 3-0 2.0333 +18 8. Oregon 3-0 1.8956 -6 9. Rutgers 3-0 1.8856 -4 10. Oklahoma 3-0 1.8598 +9 11. Ole Miss 3-0 1.8516 -1 12. Maryland 3-0 1.8320 +9 13. BYU 3-0 1.7822 +32 14. Notre Dame 3-0 1.6610 - 15. Baylor 3-0 1.6577 +8 16. Liberty 3-0 1.6137 +2 17. Auburn 2-1 1.5992 +23 18. Kansas State 3-0 1.4979 +18 19. North Carolina 2-1 1.4856 +10 20. Cincinnati 3-0 1.4599 +26 21. Texas Tech 3-0 1.4481 +55 22. Texas 2-1 1.3961 +2 23. Boston College 3-0 1.3869 +3 24. Wake Forest 3-0 1.3526 +8 25. Michigan State 3-0 1.3457 +4 121. New Mexico State 1-3 -1.1917 -8 122. Florida State 0-3 -1.2146 -6 123. Rice 0-3 -1.2791 - 124. Navy 0-2 -1.2958 -3 125. Tulsa 0-3 -1.4265 -5 126. Massachusetts 0-3 -1.4481 -12 127. Arizona 0-3 -1.5509 +1 128. UNLV 0-3 -1.8753 -1 129. Ohio U 0-3 -2.0487 - 130. Connecticut 0-4 -2.4769 pre:Delta Team Rec Score -19 26. Virginia Tech 2-1 1.2482 -10 27. Kentucky 3-0 1.2038 +24 28. Fresno State 3-1 1.1962 +2 29. San Diego State 3-0 1.1172 +4 30. Army 3-0 1.1102 +13 31. Clemson 2-1 1.1024 +10 32. UTSA 3-0 1.0987 +6 33. TCU 2-0 1.0888 +39 34. West Virginia 2-1 1.0795 -23 35. Purdue 2-1 1.0737 +4 36. Wisconsin 1-1 1.0560 +35 37. USC 2-1 1.0445 +19 38. Houston 2-1 1.0254 +4 39. NC State 2-1 1.0129 -32 40. UCLA 2-1 0.9674 +41 41. Stanford 2-1 0.9552 +43 42. Iowa State 2-1 0.9516 -5 43. SMU 3-0 0.9503 +45 44. Minnesota 2-1 0.9439 +3 45. Coastal Carolina 3-0 0.9063 +17 46. LSU 2-1 0.8776 +27 47. Tennessee 2-1 0.8740 +12 48. Oregon State 2-1 0.8648 -31 49. UCF 2-1 0.8434 Delta Team Rec Score +19 50. Ohio State 2-1 0.8232 +25 51. Missouri 2-1 0.8224 +15 52. Syracuse 2-1 0.8186 -25 53. Arizona State 2-1 0.8157 +14 54. Wyoming 3-0 0.7937 -32 55. Virginia 2-1 0.7875 +25 56. Louisville 2-1 0.7850 -41 57. South Alabama 3-0 0.7619 +1 58. Troy 2-1 0.7600 -46 59. Pittsburgh 2-1 0.7530 -2 60. Oklahoma State 3-0 0.7527 -26 61. Nebraska 2-2 0.7368 -7 62. Memphis 3-0 0.7349 -31 63. South Carolina 2-1 0.7165 -35 64. Mississippi State 2-1 0.7041 +33 65. Western Michigan 2-1 0.6623 - 66. Florida Atlantic 2-1 0.6599 -2 67. Utah State 3-0 0.6174 -47 68. Florida 2-1 0.5593 +27 69. Duke 2-1 0.5394 -25 70. Nevada 2-1 0.4702 +20 71. Appalachian State 2-1 0.3826 -22 72. Marshall 2-1 0.3103 -19 73. New Mexico 2-1 0.2877 -25 74. Boise State 1-2 0.2707 Delta Team Rec Score +34 75. UAB 2-1 0.2639 -40 76. Air Force 2-1 0.2565 -24 77. Charlotte 2-1 0.1902 -14 78. Georgia Tech 1-2 0.1741 +5 79. Western Kentucky 1-1 0.1585 +27 80. Louisiana 2-1 0.1266 +19 81. San Jose State 2-1 0.0901 +31 82. Louisiana-Monroe 1-1 0.0628 +23 83. Eastern Michigan 2-1 0.0607 -33 84. Kent State 1-2 -0.1165 +33 85. Washington 1-2 -0.1239 +22 86. California 1-2 -0.1744 -12 87. Indiana 1-2 -0.1939 -9 88. Utah 1-2 -0.1980 -19 89. Buffalo 1-2 -0.2447 -19 90. Toledo 1-2 -0.2662 -35 91. Colorado 1-2 -0.3008 -5 92. Northwestern 1-2 -0.3636 +4 93. Georgia Southern 1-2 -0.3938 +17 94. Miami (OH) 1-2 -0.3947 -33 95. Central Michigan 1-2 -0.3995 -13 96. Middle Tennessee 1-2 -0.4021 -19 97. Kansas 1-2 -0.4154 -37 98. Tulane 1-2 -0.4256 -19 99. Washington State 1-2 -0.4279 Delta Team Rec Score -12 100. Southern Miss 1-2 -0.4530 - 101. Miami (FL) 1-2 -0.4680 +18 102. Bowling Green 1-2 -0.4966 -4 103. Louisiana Tech 1-2 -0.5007 +12 104. East Carolina 1-2 -0.5019 -3 105. Temple 1-2 -0.5106 -3 106. UTEP 2-1 -0.5384 -3 107. Illinois 1-3 -0.5496 -22 108. Florida Intl 1-2 -0.5764 -15 109. Texas State 1-2 -0.5856 -20 110. Old Dominion 1-2 -0.6288 -19 111. North Texas 1-2 -0.6975 +14 112. Colorado State 1-2 -0.7041 -18 113. Arkansas State 1-2 -0.7252 +9 114. Georgia State 1-2 -0.7799 +4 115. Akron 1-2 -0.8238 -11 116. Northern Illinois 1-2 -0.8370 +10 117. South Florida 1-2 -0.8643 -8 118. Ball State 1-2 -0.9575 -7 119. Hawaii 1-3 -1.0278 -27 120. Vanderbilt 1-2 -1.0654 dirty shrimp money fucked around with this message at 15:42 on Sep 20, 2021 |
# ¿ Sep 20, 2021 14:32 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2024 06:40 |
|
Komet posted:Is that the actual SP+ ranking or just a goon's moon poll? just my moon poll
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2021 15:09 |
|
Bird in a Blender posted:Just out of curiosity, but how do you get the data for your poll? I did a moon poll a long time ago, but it took me so long to put all the data into my spreadsheets I gave up. Seemed like it was hard to find a good place to get all that data in an easily formatted way. I was trying to use a lot though, points for/against, yards for/against, turnovers, first downs, and maybe a couple other things. I'm old fashioned and use a spreadsheet, importing data from other spreadsheets I generate at https://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MFB&division=11. I've streamlined things over the years to where I can pretty much copy/paste.I use wins/losses, points for/against, yards for/against, and turnover margin; bonuses for wins over top 25 teams (AP in Week 1, my ranking after), win/loss streak, and strength of schedule. If I have free time I can even do my own strength of schedule calculation but most of the time I get lazy and use KenPom since his calculation comes close enough to mine.
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2021 17:00 |
|
SundayMoney posted:I am fairly certain that ULM was the worst team you had last year, I was curious if you could see what they finished with last year compared to what UCONN is doing this year? Just for comparisons sake as I know ULM was awful last year 2020 to anything else is a bit apples to oranges but ULM finished 0-10 last year on an 11 game losing streak, all while playing the 4th weakest schedule in the country. They finished at -7. If I extrapolate UConn out to 12 games and assume they finish 0-12, due to what should work out to be an average strength of schedule they'll finish around -5. dirty shrimp money fucked around with this message at 18:48 on Sep 20, 2021 |
# ¿ Sep 20, 2021 18:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/RossDellenger/status/1440756777562214401 Playoff expansion talks are collapsing. The Pac 12 is a hard no on a field of 12. The SEC is a hard no on a field of 8 and 6 autobids. Notre Dame demands a special exemption for them. The G5 will go to the courts if there are less than 6 autobids.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 14:27 |
|
General Dog posted:I’m betting the compromise ends up being 5+5. As I understand all 10 FBS conferences (as they're all members of the CFP) have to vote yes for any format change before the current contract expires. Having only five autobids cuts the G5 out which means 5 automatic no votes under the current CFP, and if that's the new model in 2025 the G5 aren't going to sign on to that and would have a pretty good antitrust case.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 16:18 |
|
General Dog posted:They’re not cut out if it’s “five highest ranked conference champions”, rather than formal autobids for the P5. I reckon the G5 would take that as an even bigger insult than being cut out entirely. You might be onto something.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 16:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2024 06:40 |
|
Suddenly here’s UNLV up two TDs on Fresno State early, that should make Lessail (I think that’s him?) happy
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2021 03:52 |