|
I wanna snuggle 132, I don't care if he mauls me. 747 is an obvious favourite, but I have a good feeling about 812 this year. Chunky mama's got spunk.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2021 00:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 22:39 |
|
435 yearling ain’t even trying IMO, 128 got that one on lock. Can’t see him beating 132 though, that cub is a BEAST
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 20:06 |
|
Yeah 132 is extremely chonk, but how cute is 128? Ugh my conviction wavers.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2021 17:02 |
|
Was gonna go 128, but my girlfriend insisted we go for 132.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2021 22:00 |
|
Otis ain’t nothing to gently caress with
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2021 18:52 |
|
Brute Squad posted:I went 128 over 132's spring cub because Grazer is a unit. 132's cub is roly poly, but still has a way to go to hang with the big bears. Walker's bulk beat out Chunk's renegade scar in my book. Yeah see I went with 132 because while 128 has that raw chonk, 132 brings the fluff to the yard. To put it another way, I’d like to get mauled by 132 more than by 128. As for the 151 / 32 match up, 32 barely chonked up, while 151? That’s the perfect example of a fattening bear, look at that spring form; look at that fat booty.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2021 20:18 |
|
Wrong Theory posted:
Chunk is a chonky rear end bear
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2021 13:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 22:39 |
|
No loving way. We need to audit those votes.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2021 05:26 |