Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

It's a movie set. People have different jobs. The armorer has the job of ensuring the props are safe to use. No way is this on the actor. They don't know what is real or fake, safe or dangerous.

If it had been a physical stunt where one actor falls onto another with a stunt coordinator arranging it all and something went wrong you'd not hold the falling actor responsible. You'd look to the stunt team for who screwed up.

Baldwin as a producer might be liable for other failings but as an actor it's not his job to understand if the gun he's holding has real cartridges or props. Hell, he probably didn't even know it was an actual firearm. I don't even understand why he was charged at all.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

The Single Action Army is well known for being a firearm that can discharge a round without pulling the trigger. The hammer basically rests on the primer when it is down and there's no hammer block mechanism on the trigger when it is cocked. The hammer notches can wear meaning you can push the hammer off the notch with pressure without pulling the trigger.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

je1 healthcare posted:

To clarify, he 100% knew it was a real gun and that there were real bullets on the set, because the armorer and other crew members were loving around with it and using it for target practice out back.

There were also two accidental discharges in the days leading up to it which is partially what resulted in the crew members walking off that morning

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/10/22/alec-baldwin-rust-safety-complaints-before-death-reports/6141302001/

Also lol that the company is called Rust Movie Productions LLC.
Was he present when they were using it for target practice? Did he know it was the same gun? Was it the same gun? Also that article says it had "misfires". Misfires in shooting terms means the trigger was pulled but the cartridge did not fire. That tells me that someone pulled the trigger of the gun expecting a report and didn't get one. That's a major screwup but not the same thing as an accidental discharge.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

Baldwin is not going down for this. It sounds like the production had problems, the armorer was a complete screw up and the assistant director didn't do their job.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

Blue Footed Booby posted:

How do feds prove the trigger was pulled in a revolver without a firing pin block or other form of safety disconnect? "The gun fired" isn't sufficient, at least for court purposes.

They can't. This is a gun where you're supposed to load one, skip one, then load 4 more because it's unsafe to carry 6 in it with the hammer down.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

That is real interesting given a firing pin rests on the primer and you don't even need to pull the trigger to set it off-just bump the back of the hammer hard enough.

Reading that quote verbatim it says they proved you need to pull the trigger to drop the hammer but it doesn't address the firing pin sitting on the primer when the hammer is down.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Sorry but that is completely bullshit. You are right that it is not the actor's job to oversee safety precautions, but your conclusion is rear end-backwards. It is absolutely the actor's job to observe that safety precautions are followed, by not doing anything stupid without the explicit go-ahead of the actual licensed security personnel. Which, a random producer yelling "cold gun" while tossing you an unsecured weapon off a random table is categorically not.

What he definitely did and should not have done was:
-accept a gun without personally seeing the armorer checking the barrel and all cylinders and test firing it to triple check that it is in fact unloaded
-pointing it at an unshielded person when it wasn't strictly necessary for the take
-pointing it at anyone at all without the supervision of a licensed armorer

Doing any one of those means you're culpable for whatever wrongful death occurs.
Right. Baldwin heard the producer yell cold gun, and was handed the firearm taken from the table of weapons that the armorer provided.

They were using dummy rounds on set so checking the gun to ensure it was unloaded wouldn't necessarily have been done.

The biggest screwup is the fact that live ammo was brought anywhere near that set. That is such a basic, absurd mistake by the armorer.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

Seems like she rode her dad's coattails into the industry and is one of those people who thinks that's good enough while being woefully unqualified and unprofessional.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

:ughh:

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

E. Revenant posted:



This image conveys just how hosed her practices were on the set.

-The marked round with the nickel primer is the live round. It's amazingly easy to spot and should have been checked just because it obviously doesn't belong.

-Dummies with indented primers and ones with smooth un-indented primers are mixed up. Only indented primer dummies should be loaded into guns. The cosmetic dummy flat primer rounds should never be in a gun because they are indistinguishable visually from live rounds.

-I can't find exact testimony but set rumor is that she would load that tray and rattle the entire thing to check for blanks. No one is going to hear the one silent live round out of all the other rattling ones.

Also we now have Dave Halls testimony from just before the killing. He's the Assistant Director who plead guilty for not checking the gun that was handed off.

-Gutierrez the armorer brought the gun unloaded to the church and Halls verified that it was an unloaded "cold gun".
-Gutierrez then loaded the gun after she had an unheard conversation with Baldwin.
-Gutierrez went back the Halls and rotated the cylinder a few times so Halls could check for depressed primers but he didn't count so he doesn't know how many he actually inspected.
-Halls declared it good and Gutierrez handed the gun to Baldwin

There was no reason for the gun to be loaded with dummies for a practice take. It will be interesting what comes out on why she or Baldwin decided to load the gun.

That’s all way too complicated and unnecessary. They could have used solid dummy rounds not made from real brass and primers for gods sake. That armorer is a complete loving idiot. It boggles the mind.

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

The bare minimum of safety would have been-

Toxic Mental posted:

If I were the armorer on set I simply wouldn't have brought real bullets to the set

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Big Ass On Fire
Jun 16, 2023

My little buttercup, has the sweetest: e-smile! e-smile!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply