|
How are u posted:I think that Main Paineframe pretty accurately sums up my thoughts, so I'll just quote them That’s kind of a boring quote. MPF had a way funnier one Main Paineframe posted:
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2021 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 13:05 |
|
|
Killin_Like_Bronson posted:Spite modding: exhibit 2356 The probe reason is just “don’t make me remember that person I’ve decided I like was terrible” So I’d call it the perfect D&D sixer
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:05
|
|
|
It’s actually really funny to see somebody get probed for pointing out Sherman was a pos after a page of people discussing how offensive it is when people say smoothbrains or call these forums dead and gay Real big brain smart guy stuff going on here E: is it ableist to call something big brain smart guy stuff? Asking for a friend that friend being me because I just said it HashtagGirlboss fucked around with this message at 15:23 on Oct 28, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:19
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:
Idk. If you have a gang tag that opens you up to easy criticism, maybe you should accept that criticism instead of getting bizarrely defensive about it and hitting buttons to make the mean people go away
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:38
|
|
Nobody is saying Sherman's treatment of the Natives was not despicable. But the idea that you guys are going to go pretend gang tags are a wholly historical treatment of the people in the tag and something reflects the entirety of that person is hilarious.
|
CommieGIR posted:You are posting on SomethingAwful, if you expected anything less than that, you probably should've set your sights a little lower. So is your position then that nobody can point out that gang tag is in poor taste because it’s already been pointed out and you’ve decided the criticism is wrong and you shouldn’t ever have to hear it again? May I point out that this is a good example of using your buttons to win arguments
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:42
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:If I was doing so, I would've already hit you with a sixer. Surprisingly, I'm not. So is pointing out that the Sherman gang tag is in poor taste probable or not? If it isn’t, why did you probe lib or let die? If it is, go ahead and probe me over it because I agree it’s in bad taste, not because I want to own you, but because I think celebrating Sherman in light of his treatment of native Americans is in very poor taste
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:47
|
|
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:This thread is for d&d feedback not inane gotchas about gang tags. That’s fair, but my question is should a mod or ik be using their buttons because somebody pointed out that their tag is in poor taste?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:52
|
|
|
I think having a Sherman gang tag is like dropping the r word. You can do it but people are going to call you out for it and there will be consequences in general If you like it that’s fine, but don’t get defensive when people point out that it’s in really poor taste
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 15:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 13:05 |
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I wonder how many people complaining about the Sherman gang tag have a Facebook account I’m not following your point? My feedback is that that is an example of a bad probe because the criticism, whether in good faith or not, is valid criticism and Commie opened themself up to it be sporting the tag. If mods can give you sizers for pointing out that the things they do or say are in poor taste than what’s the rule you’re aiming to enforce? Are we back to mod sass being probable? Are mods and iks just allowed to use their buttons to tell people making valid points to go away? The tag itself is far less interesting to me than the response to the tag Edit: I’ll drop it because I don’t think I’ll get any feedback which is honestly a shame (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2021 16:04
|
|