Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

Sanguinia posted:

Its this. The whole argument Thanos makes is that when he's done this experiment manually on various planets the long-term result was a glorious success that proves him right. The fact that his logic doesn't hold up just makes him like every other Malthusian. He cherry picks the data that supports his proposition because he's an arrogant narcissist who couldn't possibly be wrong.

You know, like Tony did with Ultron. That's why they're foils for each other in Infinity War and Tony's journey through the whole Saga parallels Thanos' own implied journey when he shares his backstory.

EDIT: Also in Endgame he says this time he'll just rewrite the entire universe to fit in his exact perfection vision, so it's not like that wasn't on the table. It just would have been a less satisfying victory than the "grateful universe," fixing itself because of his one action.

This is also why one of the more popular theories of why Dr. Strange needed to look through so many potential timelines to get the actual outcome of the movies was to look for a timeline where both Thanos and Tony Stark die and stay dead. If he just wanted to stop Thanos, finding any way to distract Star Lord for 15 seconds would be enough. But that wouldn't end the threat of Tony Stark loving around with the Infinity Gauntlet.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply