Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Dr. VooDoo posted:

He said that and the evidence of his connections to the Proud Boys couldn’t be admitted because this would prove a motive that existed for four months and he believed what happened is just happenstance :lol:

I would also like to talk about and plan crimes and then have the hard evidence about those statements and actions ruled inadmissable after I commit the crimes I talked about and planned

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

JAMOOOL posted:

also lmao that Rittenhouse's very legal and very cool self-defense claim stems from the idea that someone would've stolen his AR-15 and shot him with it. that's the kind of legal argument you would've heard in some 80's British comedy. like I can't legally murder a man in self-defense unless I also happened to bring a weapon to do it with

Well yeah that's the universal cop defense. He was going for my gun, blam blam blam.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply