|
Salt Fish posted:You're wrong. gently caress you
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2021 03:39 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 03:13 |
|
Lib and let die posted:OP there's actually some merit to the idea that the transmission method or medium of information is just as powerful, if not more powerful than, the message being transmitted via that medium. In the 1960's, Canadian Media Professor Marshall McLuhan proposed in his book Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man that the media itself, not the content itself is more influential on a society than any message it carries. He would also classify mediums as "hot" or "cold" mediums, based on whether some receiver engagement was expected or not. Other forums will laud the Shannon-Weaver model as an unassailable bastion of media analysis, but McLuhan saw that model as being tied to a necessary notion of efficient causality that was largely undone when the definition of efficient causality it is based upon was revealed to have been due to an early print-era mistranslation of Aristotle's idea of efficient causality. thank u
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2021 20:42 |
|
Lib and let die posted:sorry I would go annoy the other forum with stuff like this but I'm thread banned from the thread for discussing it because I was mean to the OP lol i liked the post
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2021 21:05 |
|
Lib and let die posted:oh i was expecting a bunch more 'didn't reads' and stuff. you're a very hard read yourself, mr smythe. bit of a norm macdonald 'is he doing a bit or not? i just can't tell' kinda thing. im a "thing liker" now, OP. long gone are the days of misanthropy. its all about good natured laughs and appreciation these days.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2021 00:37 |