|
The IP is owned by a separate company (I won't link to the Daily Heil article), Club Nook, that appears to be owned by the family. Make of it what you will that the IP isn't owned by the charitable foundation. edit: terrible page snipe.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 21:24 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 00:00 |
|
Also to be a charity you just have to not pay out profits; the people running the charity can pay themselves whatever they like as wages.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:04 |
|
it's going to be a foundation like Help for Heroes where the mysterious category of "miscellaneous expenses" somehow accounts for 95% of their income
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1477357890432339971
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:29 |
|
Pablo Bluth posted:The IP is owned by a separate company (I won't link to the Daily Heil article), Club Nook, that appears to be owned by the family.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:32 |
|
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:35 |
|
It's almost sad that it's impossible for these ghouls to think of any plan to help people that doesn't involve some waster getting filthy rich for doing a poo poo job
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:39 |
|
kingturnip posted:It's almost sad that it's impossible for these ghouls to think of any plan to help people that doesn't involve some waster getting filthy rich for doing a poo poo job it probably won't go past the throw a few million quid at a "study" before quietly forgetting it all, if it even goes that far the task isn't to find actual solutions to a problem but to simply generate headlines so it looks like they are doing a thing next up, the blockchain will be used to clamp down on benefits payments AND stop migrants crossing the channel using custom NFT's and a bespoke... something or other
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:44 |
|
What if the predators use dogs to scare off the drones?
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 22:58 |
|
Guavanaut posted:What if the predators use dogs to scare off the drones? Introduce xenomorphs as an invasive species to keep the Predator population down
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 23:02 |
|
Hallucinogenic Toreador posted:Also to be a charity you just have to not pay out profits; the people running the charity can pay themselves whatever they like as wages. While this is true at a base level it's complicated as gently caress to get charity status and run a charity once you have it. The vast majority of people working in the sector do it as at least somewhat a labour of love.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2022 23:15 |
|
NB This poll was 'red wall' that went tory in 2019 only. https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1477398022065688583?s=20 Zalakwe posted:While this is true at a base level it's complicated as gently caress to get charity status and run a charity once you have it. The vast majority of people working in the sector do it as at least somewhat a labour of love. As someone who works for a small local charity I concur! We have just three employees, all of us part-time and the FTE salary of the Chief Exec is under £30k (I'm not sure exactly what it is as I only see the pro-ratad net when it turns up in Xero but a reverse calc based on her hours and without knowing how much NEST / tax code etc comes up to something around £27-£29k). We're all doing substantially over our paid hours and there's no overtime or 'time off in lieu' available. Fortunately, as you know, I love doing spreadsheets and attempting to bend Salesforce to my will. Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 00:10 on Jan 2, 2022 |
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:06 |
|
It would be funny if they calibrated the algorithm according to the most common sexual assaulters and now white boomers would be followed from pub to home by drones, which would then stay on watch behind the bedroom window.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:10 |
|
The Perfect Element posted:I find all the sir Tom stuff pretty distasteful too, but isn’t all the merch raising money for his foundation? The gin certainly is, although I’ve got no idea how the money is split. Massive salaries for the directors perhaps?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:19 |
Hang on, are we supposed to be flagging down buses or drones? I just can't keep up.
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/sufferingnatsci/status/1477359108462362625
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:25 |
|
All you need to do is phone the police and say "Hi I'm a vulnerable woman and I'll be at home all on my own at 123 Acacia Avenue all night".
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:28 |
|
Nenonen posted:It would be funny if they calibrated the algorithm according to the most common sexual assaulters and now white boomers would be followed from pub to home by drones, which would then stay on watch behind the bedroom window. That would be great but we all know they'd design the algorithm to hone in on someone else.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:30 |
|
so they're ChukTigTaf now?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:32 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:All you need to do is phone the police and say "Hi I'm a vulnerable woman and I'll be at home all on my own at 123 Acacia Avenue all night". I would say 22 Acacia Avenue and then they wouldn't come because they'd know Eddie was there to look after me. (Ps I'm not Charlotte) Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Jan 2, 2022 |
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:39 |
|
Now the Met can harass and stalk women from afar yay!
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:39 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Introduce xenomorphs as an invasive species to keep the Predator population down You joke, but the end of that train of thought I "get loads of Ripley in Power Loaders on every street at night." And honestly, that probably would make women safer.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:48 |
Jaeluni Asjil posted:I would say 22 Acacia Avenue and then they wouldn't come because they'd know Eddie was there to look after me. (Ps I'm not Charlotte) Typical police, spying on a harlot and ignoring the murders in the Rue Morgue.
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:49 |
|
Lady Demelza posted:Typical police, spying on a harlot and ignoring the murders in the Rue Morgue. Weren't those a trained chimpanzee or something though? Or am I confusing it with something else? (Doh! My brain went down a totally different track then!) On further investigation, it was an Orang Utang. Now I wonder if The Librarian would get IDd and arrested by the cops just for being orange. Honest, Hofficer, I am not under the influence... my brain doesn't need psychoactive ingredients to spin off in wild directions. Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Jan 2, 2022 |
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:50 |
|
We do not talk about the orangutan!
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:57 |
|
Guavanaut posted:We do not talk about the orangutan! Is that the first rule of Book Club? We do not talk about the Librarian?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 00:58 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Is that the first rule of Book Club?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:03 |
|
Oo err missus! So was Pratchett doing a racism when he made the librarian an orangutan?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:12 |
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:12 |
|
Guavanaut posted:It's from this: (along with Satan is not a loving pogo stick!) That is amazing. Thank you.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:18 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Oo err missus!
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:19 |
|
Guavanaut posted:We do not talk about the orangutan! https://twitter.com/KiwiEV/status/1477390523182714881 Heard you were talking poo poo about orangutans
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:30 |
|
We're saved! Keith might take over! https://twitter.com/MoS_Politics/status/1477395359890649091
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:34 |
|
I like the sidebar. "The Conservatives have delivered improvements in quality of life and employment, but we can't do the green new deal stuff because people are barely making ends meet and can't afford their gas bills, anyway we need to focus on people's priorities rather than what we think they want, so more controls on immigration."
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 01:54 |
|
Fuckin' hell. No more neophiliac tech boondoggles please. Simpler and cheaper to offer (or make available for collection at nightclubs etc.) every woman who felt she might be in this position; a very powerful torch*, a gently caress-off loud alarm and an aluminium baseball bat. Maybe a taser. * a friend once escaped a stop by a motorcycle cop by zapping him with the mecablitz flash gun he had with him as the orificer stuck his head in his car window. Something bright enough to do that. The Question IRL posted:You joke, but the end of that train of thought I "get loads of Ripley in Power Loaders on every street at night." Totally up for armed female self-defence groups. Some kind of Panthers.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 02:03 |
|
https://twitter.com/Dr_FarrisD/status/1477400829426647044
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 02:47 |
They will never actually have drones follow people or whatever, if anything it'll be just another way to funnel money from the public purse to Tory donor's pockets which then goes back to the Tory party again.
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 04:01 |
|
WhatEvil posted:They will never actually have drones follow people or whatever, if anything it'll be just another way to funnel money from the public purse to Tory donor's pockets which then goes back to the Tory party again. Following on from Nenonen's post, if this scheme gets approved, a Met Police officer will 100% use the drone to sexually harass someone. If not something worse. And Priti Patel will use the drone to 'prove' the person isn't entitled to stay in the country.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 04:20 |
|
Be at peace, citizen. The drone is there for your protection. Friend computer would never hurt you. It is not tangled in your hair. An officer will be dispatched shortly to relieve you of your scalp.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 04:39 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 00:00 |
|
Flying drones in a city, on unplanned routes, at night, out of line of sight, over uninvolved members of the public, is such a safety and regulatory nightmare that I can't imagine how anyone would ever get permission for it without specific legislation. If the UK follows the new EASA rules or similar for UAS it'd require a named operator who has qualified on the special "certified" license, the full rules for which are not yet published but based on the old system it'll be expensive and time consuming to achieve and require regular logged flights and maintenance to stay current on. Possibly you'd be able to get blanket approval for limited missions following a specific flight profile, but unless vulnerable women stick to preapproved routes you'd need each flight planned and signed off, seeking permission from the aviation authority beforehand. The whole idea would be laughable except that it's the cops so I guess the law doesn't really matter and they'll hand over the controls to whoever fancies a shot.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 05:19 |