|
chaosbreather posted:finding a job? what explain yourself
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:55 |
|
|
DaTroof posted:how so the latter? are you saying you can't find jobs that aren't full-stack js/ts? because i guarantee that's a personal problem and not an industry-wide fact hes saying he can convince people that typescript is more economical by putting a number on a slide and showing it to them
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:51
|
|
|
which i mean honestly i completely believe that
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:51
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:it's really hard to make a business case for using something other than typescript to project owners the only time this is true is when the project owners are really invested in using typescript to begin with
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:53
|
|
|
after that edit about project owners, yeah, i think i know what you mean but i never disagreed that a lot of failures choose their tech stacks poorly
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:54
|
|
|
rotor posted:the only time this is true is when the project owners are really invested in using typescript to begin with oh yeah i basically only see greenfield or major digital transformation projects with project owners who have to use external studios. if there's a scrap of existing code that takes priority over pretty much every argument anyone can make
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 03:57
|
|
|
rotor posted:hes saying he can convince people that typescript is more economical by putting a number on a slide and showing it to them more than this – we have to win work, right, with competing proposals. typescript has a ton of factors – all those loving words i wrote – that you can just use to tear any other non-typescript proposal apart, it's like a nuke. you can only fight it with other teams doing it faster or better.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:00
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:more than this – we have to win work, right, with competing proposals. typescript has a ton of factors – all those loving words i wrote – that you can just use to tear any other non-typescript proposal apart, it's like a nuke. you can only fight it with other teams doing it faster or better. this is a weird argument. i guess you mean, if you're making a greenfield app, nothing else but typescript makes sense? eh, never mind. this conversation is weird. you're weird.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:03
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:more than this – we have to win work, right, with competing proposals. typescript has a ton of factors – all those loving words i wrote – that you can just use to tear any other non-typescript proposal apart, it's like a nuke. you can only fight it with other teams doing it faster or better. i feel pretty confident i could do the same thing with any other modern language given the same audience but sure ok
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:03
|
|
|
rotor posted:i feel pretty confident i could do the same thing with any other modern language given the same audience but sure ok
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:05
|
|
|
like the fact that program managers for these "digital transformation" projects are easy marks doesnt really matter to anyone here, but i'm happy you're out there doin what you're doin.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:05
|
|
|
DaTroof posted:this is a weird argument. i guess you mean, if you're making a greenfield app, nothing else but typescript makes sense? making a greenfield app AND using lowest-bidder third party contractors to do it
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:06
|
|
|
also forgot to post earlier but thanks for the love and support everyone
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:07
|
|
|
you're saying that typescript is actually the best choice. that's distinct from what you've actually shown, which is that it's easy to snow people into thinking it is. a group of propositions that constitute evidence or a logical and/or probabilistic basis for another proposition is oftentimes called an argument.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:09
|
|
|
rotor posted:i feel pretty confident i could do the same thing with any other modern language given the same audience but sure ok finally, awesome. please give me one that would convince my boss. i feel like i've tried everything.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:10
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:finally, awesome. please give me one that would convince my boss. i feel like i've tried everything. who would i bill this work to?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:10
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:finally, awesome. please give me one that would convince my boss. i feel like i've tried everything. it sounds like the problem is not what the best technology is, but who your boss is
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:11
|
|
|
Achmed Jones posted:you're saying that typescript is actually the best choice. that's distinct from what you've actually shown, which is that it's easy to snow people into thinking it is. a group of propositions that constitute evidence or a logical and/or probabilistic basis for another proposition is oftentimes called an argument. looks like you've only read about a third of the things i wrote if you're there. i sympathise
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:13
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:looks like you've only read about a third of the things i wrote if you're there. i sympathise have you seen some of the blocks of cheddar cheese you've posted in this thread? i guarantee there's more than one that not a single yosposter has read completely
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:16
|
|
|
today im thankful because my friends and coworkers simp for poo poo that's actually interesting and sometimes useful like scala or go or r. if i had to hear them talk about how javascript or python were actually good, id probably choose to drown myself in the nearest body of water.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 04:46
|
|
|
Canine Blues Arooo posted:today im thankful because my friends and coworkers simp for poo poo that's actually interesting and sometimes useful like scala or go or r. if i had to hear them talk about how javascript or python were actually good, id probably choose to drown myself in the nearest body of water. i'm thankful that my coworkers generally don't bother with these discussions at all and just get poo poo done in whatever tech stack is in front of us (semi-relevant albeit petty addendum: the stack never involves javascript on the server)
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 05:04
|
|
|
langs get chosen for a thousand reasons other than what is Objectively The Best, film at 11
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 07:14
|
|
|
also lol chaosbreather, forced to use typescript against their will. lmao owned
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 07:16
|
|
|
have you considered all the benefits fortran has to offer?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 11:21
|
|
|
i'm a dapper fortran man
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 11:39
|
|
|
Gentle Autist posted:also lol chaosbreather, forced to use typescript against their will. lmao owned foreverially typescripted and loving it
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 16:21
|
|
|
True computer hipsters are looking at PHP 8.1 and loving it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 19:30
|
|
|
buttchugging adderall posted:True computer hipsters are looking at PHP 8.1 and loving it. wth https://php.watch/versions/8.1/fibers this is very not-php 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 20:51
|
|
|
true computer hipsters are encoding their problems in the Constrained Quadratic Model and solving them using hybrid quantum annealing
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 21:20
|
|
|
Gentle Autist posted:wth Oh it's very PHP and it's goooooooooood.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 21:20
|
|
|
is PHP just leaning into being poo poo? now with more fiber?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 21:21
|
|
|
Tom Collins posted:is PHP just leaning into being poo poo? now with more fiber? Bud PHP8 fixed almost everything left wrong with PHP (where PHP7 did most of the fixing). Then PHP 8.1 introduced more fiber, and PHP9 is slated to fix a ton of the rest of it (but that's a few years out). The people behind PHP have learned.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 22:11
|
|
|
It's me, I'm the computer hipster that likes modern PHP.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2022 22:35
|
|
|
are shell scripts hipster?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 11:34
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:are shell scripts hipster? only if you use a hipster shell scripting language
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 11:58
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:are shell scripts hipster? sure,.i guess. i mean they're fine, they do a job. i prefer the more authentic computation you can only achieve by typing out instructions by hand each time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 12:02
|
|
|
is running sh -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.github.com/somerandompieceofshit/fart/install.sh)" hipster? i think yes yes
git apologist fucked around with this message at 14:05 on Apr 27, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 14:02
|
|
|
Gentle Autist posted:is running sh -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.github.com/somerandompieceofshit/fart/install.sh)" hipster? i think yes yes most definitely
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 17:23
|
|
|
[logo in the modern anodyne corporate style, but of a pig] Trough is the world's most performant data ingestion system and part of the Piggy platform. Written in Go so you can be sure it's fast and reliable! Install it with code:
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 17:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:55 |
|
|
Fortaleza posted:[logo in the modern anodyne corporate style, but of a pig] Issue Report: Summary: `trough` command fails to run recursively when using `-r` Details: Hey Piggy and Oink team! I love this tool but I noticed an issue where when I try to run `mud -r ./dir/**/*.feed` it seems to just return back with only the first `feed` being pig-processed. Not sure if there's other reports of this, and I can't give logs as the data here is client confidential. Thanks again! Response: Closed, won't fix. `-r` does not mean `recursive`, it's for `roll` and is for telling the piggy engine to do a trough rollup. Also duplicate of Issue #42069 and #219. In the future, please note that we don't normally respond to issue reports without logs, please give logs, we Piggies want our logs! - Oink Oink!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 17:47
|
|