Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC
I don't want to retype my thoughts as they are succinctly found in these two posts in the China thread. If D&D is supposed to be separate from CSPAM in a meaningful way, I think the issues I raised need to be looked at.

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3466532&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=659#post520975623

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3466532&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=659#post520976462

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

Potato Salad posted:

reading onward a little bit, it kinda looks like those got addressed pretty solidly

like I'm curious what you see was left out when mods went on to further engage with you

I was asked to post it here for visibility reasons (Fritz's post). I let it drop after that because I wasn't out to get a probation for someone. I just felt that D&D wasn't the place to drop random assertions that take more time to refute than it does to post.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

Koos Group posted:

I've been thinking about how exactly to deal with this, and there are a few options. Ideally I would just tell my mods, and I suppose Commie in particular, to be especially gentle when debating and watch for anything that could be interpreted as a threat. I could also make a rule for mods that they can never probate someone they're arguing with, which doesn't sound like a bad idea. The extreme solution would be forbidding mods from debating entirely, which I'd like to avoid.

I don't think that is necessary at all as long as if posters report shitposts from mods who themselves cross the line, then other mods take a meaningful look at it. Mods are volunteer positions still on SA are they not? It shouldn't be a job where they can't do this or that.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

A big flaming stink posted:

I'd just like to let fritz know they should chill with trying to police what is or is not on-topic. I recall them being particularly quick on the draw to demand posters drop something in the COVID and China thread from recent memory.

Sounds more like you want a carte-blanche on more Whataboutism to poo poo up the China thread.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

A big flaming stink posted:

alright i was told to come here so let me state my beef





this is an INSANELY lovely weaponization and minimization of the terms abuse and abuser. there is ABSOLUTELY NOT a power disparity in online forums remotely analogous to the one present between abuser and victim, and to see it invoked this way is not just loving rude as hell, its also deeply offensive to victims of abuse!

like maybe its my own history with abuse, but this poo poo makes me see red.

You get to redefine what the word abuse means now?

edit: I mean it makes sense right? Any time your position is attacked. Just redefine the word to something so ambigious and implies it means something else so you don't have to deal with it. Just like how Authoritarianism derail happened

MikeC fucked around with this message at 03:47 on Jan 31, 2022

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Idk if it's offensive or whatnot but calling people itt abusers and trolls seems like flagrantly violating multiple DnD posting rules like assuming good faith and not posting about posters. He's been regularly shitposting in a thread under constant moderator supervision yet somehow never seems to catch even a 6er.


Smeef posted:

For example, it would have been over far more quickly and smoothly if the response was "Your use of the word 'abuser' is possibly insensitive to people who have been victims of abuse. Can you choose a different word next time?"

Noting that big flaming stink appears to have experienced abuse, their angry response is also understandable. Again, the right thing to do isn't to escalate in response to them, it's something like "Maybe my word choice was poor. Here's what I really meant, using different language."

Koos Group posted:

I just Googled the word and the overwhelming definition in use is the one more familiar to you and I, so you're right, he should be stopped from using it the way he is, since it's loaded language and poor communication.

Except the context is very clear if you actually read the thread instead of taking isolated posts. He's posting right after *yet another* bout of Whataboutism when Terminal Autism https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3466532&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=661#post521093439 and Neurolimtal https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3466532&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=661#post521098251 tried to say that censorship is just the same in 'murica cuz they use soft power to ensure all movies are pro war, pro cop, etc etc and that censorship is effectively the same. Yet again I had to sit there and type a response to prove the blatant lie that took longer to vet than the baseless claim. This is exactly the type of thread making GBS threads I have talked about before. Constantly posting low content bullshit in the hopes no one takes the time to disprove it. It is an obvious misuse of posting to deflect criticism of China in the China thread.

Smeef's point on Stink's options is spot on. It very much feels like their goal is to take any language that could be misconstrued as offensive and say 'WE GOT HIM BOYS' and start an even wider derail - all in the effort to punish their posting enemies and not engage on the topic at hand - because they can't really defend their positions or be bothered to see if the other person's reply is valid or not. I am well beyond the point of "charity" here. It is the same people, using the same tactics, week after week.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Idk why you included my post in that weird rant because I explicitly did not take offense to his use of that word.

It was quoted because DV wasn't doing the typical poo poo posting that you claimed he was. He was directly involved in being the target of a Whataboutism post - hence his response about here

Discendo Vox posted:

How is it that we are once again making opposite-of-reality equivocations between "the West" and China in this thread?

To prove my point about 'gotcha-ism' that is being taken advantage of - regardless of what you think about DV's post or my belief the DV's choice of words was within the proper context - this guy comes in and tries to smear all other posters who might agree with anything I have said in the past via guilt by association.

Mirello posted:

lol, can I put this post in a museum? all the anti china posters itt, this is who you agree with. seriously, you guys make yourselves look totally ridiculous.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC
e: you know what nevermind.

MikeC fucked around with this message at 05:35 on Jan 31, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

some plague rats posted:

This is a good start, but it doesn't prevent other mods from coming in and handing out probes to anyone being rude to their buddies. When mods involved in an argument say something like "I'll get some other mods to look over this" it comes across as "I want to probe you but that would violate the rules so I'll have someone else take a look because there's a good chance they'll think like me"

Is there a concrete example of this happening? I cannot remember any such incidents.

edit: Also why do I have a dog avatar now? If it is an meme, I would like to understand what it is.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply