|
mediocre book you've actually read and did problems from beats great book you hoard in your pdf trove any day of the week
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2022 15:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 01:11 |
|
|
so have i and so do i, altho this 'relevance eng' job just involves normal software dev nowadays. still applies imo
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2022 16:30
|
|
|
one of my more deranged things i do is to get a pdf copy, then a separate paper copy, and then start tearing out pages from textbook as i read em. gives sense of progress. i also write on textbooks very liberally same w papers, but this is less deranged behavior w papers one book ive read that punches above its weight in my thinkin is michael i jordan and sejnowski's graphical models book. sejnowski's rbm was material part of the start of all this and if you wanna be a weenie about explainability imo you're better off shoving graphical models in poo poo. koller and friedman have a deec graphical models textbook but it goes less hard into the statstical physics than id like hybrid graphical models and neural crap was how waymo did stuff for a fair bit. now i'm given to understand they have more rl poo poo in there. that's been my reading lately but i dont think there's a definitive good neural rl book yet. but shoving rl and pgm into one book is unfortunately pretty vast and pgm stuff has a lot of practitioner voodoo in it unfortunately bob dobbs is dead fucked around with this message at 17:03 on Apr 26, 2022 |
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2022 16:47
|
|
|
cardinality of data? if its like 20k thats a nice afternoon for a few peeps w/ real eyeballs
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2022 23:41
|
|
|
Raenir Salazar posted:The requirements are for a minimum of 1200 training images and 400 testing images balanced between the four classes. Is it normal to just use the Mark 1 Eyeball for this? The programmer in me definitely feels like if there was a way to conveniently automate this I should, but that also sounds suspiciously exactly like the point of the project eyeball will be cheaper and faster hard to get a decent programmer for less than $100/hr. can get a manual peep to classify for min wage 1200, you dont even need to hire peeps. take two hours and whack it out
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2022 23:50
|
|
|
if they're making new algorithms, sure if you're classifying per se in production there's a fuckton of images and you're getting a sample to train with
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2022 23:58
|
|
|
dan jurafsky the years i knew him was kinda 3/4 of the way to being a crying shambling wreck because the neural net peeps were running roughshod over his life's work. he's fundamentally not a neural nets guy and neither is martin iirc. of course they are forced to shove it in any nlu book now
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2022 09:47
|
|
|
cs229 for reals has pretty moderate problem sets that they still couldn't deal with when they started coursera with it https://cs229.stanford.edu/summer2019/ps1.pdf fast.ai is decent enough for neural nets stuff. although you won't be doing nontrivial original stuff from it, you should not condign anyone to that fate in a corp anyways bob dobbs is dead fucked around with this message at 09:53 on Jun 13, 2022 |
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2022 09:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 01:11 |
|
|
you can get pearlmutter's trick done for pseudo second order method and lots of first order methods with vague handwaving towards curvatures but not much else
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2022 20:39
|
|