|
Verviticus posted:a discussion i had with an ex a while back was that she was not totally settled on her gender identity at the time. she identified and still identifies as female, but has at different points in her life felt different or unsure. at one point she asked me if she decided that she was trans and identified as a man whether or not i would still date or or be attracted to her. it was a hard question but at the time i felt like the answer was yes. Labels are meant to be descriptive and not prescriptive, so it's ok for you to add an asterisk at the end of however you identify if you're in a position where it's relevant, or even change the labels and adopt something different if it feels more to yourself. You don't owe anyone attraction because they fit your label. Likewise, it's ok to have exceptions to your usual range of attraction. I'm not sure many people are as ready to deal with the fact that what began as a heterosexual relationship may become a queer one (struggles in existing relationships are a huge theme in newly out trans and non binary stories), but yeah. In my (limited, queer) experience, labels are there as shorthand and not law.
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2022 01:44 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 05:47 |
|
One good explanation I heard for bisexual being inclusive is that you can define the two sides as "self" and "other"
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2022 08:11 |