|
FMguru posted:His liver is failing, LMAO.
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 12:53 |
|
|
It'd be convenient but it's probably just differences in the color temperature of the lights, or the difference between real life images and the color grading of cameras, etc.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:31
|
|
|
Or she is just calling him a coward.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:33
|
|
|
FMguru posted:His liver is failing, LMAO. Which would be impressive for a man who famously doesn't drink because he's terrified he'd die like his big brother. Might be hepatitis though, inshallah.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:34
|
|
|
Randalor posted:"Now, for.the safety of the jury, we can't disclose the identity of juror 12, born May 27th, 1993, as that could open them up to intimidation. Juror 12, who lives at 324 14th St, unit 32 A, expressed some concern over how much information the media was releasing. Juror 12, who goes to Stella's Diner on the corner of Grove and Forest every morning for a cup of coffee at 6:25 before going to their place of employment at Hank's Hardware, said that the amount of personal information we were releasing to the public was downright frightening." "We contacted juror 12's father, Mr. Kryzwalski, who said his daughter expressed concern for her safety as juror 12. 'Isabella is obviously quite distraught about the whole situation." Anyway, here's juror 12's social security card, credit score, bank statements, and door keycode."
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:42
|
|
|
This is some serious Lisa S./L. Simpson level of anonymity. That's a Simpsons reference btw.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:49
|
|
|
Madkal posted:This is some serious Lisa S./L. Simpson level of anonymity. That's a Simpsons reference btw. Hear me out : All the jurors have to wear a full burqa the whole trial. It'll help keep them anonymous and drive the right wing absolutely insane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:51
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1780970065552113792
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:52
|
|
|
Xiahou Dun posted:Hear me out : The right wing have all been screaming about how unfair this is to be doing heading into Passover Week, so I'm amazed so few of them have latched onto how this started the first week after Ramadan.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 17:59
|
|
|
Just put a publication ban on the jurors.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:00
|
|
|
Rust Martialis posted:Just put a publication ban on the jurors. They don't want another delay while that's appealed to SCOTUS and then found unconstitutional.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:08
|
|
|
Fart Amplifier posted:They don't want another delay while that's appealed to SCOTUS and then found unconstitutional. Well the alternative is the trial going to poo poo when Anger Mango whips his MAGA freaks into a frenzy then someone stochastic terrorisms their way through a juror's family and on in to body bags.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
bird food bathtub posted:Well the alternative is the trial going to poo poo when Anger Mango whips his MAGA freaks into a frenzy then someone stochastic terrorisms their way through a juror's family and on in to body bags. Ok but then the trial just goes to poo poo anyway, in like a year instead of now. There is a first amendment and a public right to voire dire. The jurors are going to be identified and then later threatened by other people. The people doing the identifying will probably not be punished. This may prevent a conviction. The USA isn't the sort of country where you can expect a guy like Trump to be treated like other people.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:31
|
|
|
Can’t the judge unilaterally remove the media from sensitive proceedings? “All the jurors are now at risk of harassment/assassination” feels like it would qualify
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:38
|
|
|
haveblue posted:Can’t the judge unilaterally remove the media from sensitive proceedings? “All the jurors are now at risk of harassment/assassination” feels like it would qualify You can't close jury selection to the public. That's the thing that Eileen Canon got smacked down on appeal for, as clear error.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:39
|
|
|
haveblue posted:Can’t the judge unilaterally remove the media from sensitive proceedings? “All the jurors are now at risk of harassment/assassination” feels like it would qualify Voire dire is public and the press can report what they see and hear. The judge can sidebar jurors for questioning if he wants to protect their privacy
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 18:48
|
|
|
Then how does sequestering the jury work
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:04
|
|
|
Nissin Cup Nudist posted:Then how does sequestering the jury work Jury deliberations are secret and you can limit the information juries can receive
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:05
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:Which would be impressive for a man who famously doesn't drink because he's terrified he'd die like his big brother. Trump's diet is like a recipe for NASH.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:32
|
|
|
OgNar posted:Donald Trump - less orange, more yellow He's preparing to enter Springfield. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772 Why would the judge allow this???
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:53
|
|
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:57
|
|
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772 Hey now, it is a well understood legal principle that we don't lead with jail time for contempt of Court merely for shooting opposing counsel. He should be given at least a few oppertunities to change his behavior and at most a small fine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 19:58
|
|
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772 Because Trump knew that one of the people in the Court Room is The Thing from the 1982 film and is shooting at the creature. Alas, you can see it is the person behind Trump to his right (our left) with the mouth splitting apart and not whomever Trump is plugging.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 20:06
|
|
|
edit- deleted. Thought it was a Federal Goverment sueing him,turns out to be A federal watchdog group so I don't think it's actual news.
Comstar fucked around with this message at 20:58 on Apr 18, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 20:56
|
|
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772 Same energy: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 20:57
|
|
|
HAH! https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1781053195139080584
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 21:14
|
|
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1781009853516857772 It's the Scoleri brothers!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 21:17
|
|
|
Judge rejects Trump effort to pause Jan. 6 civil lawsuits while criminal case is ongoingquote:A federal judge has rejected an effort by former President Donald Trump to pause several civil lawsuits filed against him seeking to hold him accountable for his actions leading up to the Jan. 6 riot, according to a newly posted ruling.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 21:46
|
|
|
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/18/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial/fe41577e-7d22-57b7-8f14-d236970fa55d?smid=url-sharequote:We now have 12 jurors. Two more people have been seated.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 21:57
|
|
|
I saw someone say in a conversation that being on the Trump Trial would make them actually WANT to be on the Jury. Two Thoughts: One), Are they nuts? Do they know that Trump.MAGA will give any and all jurors (and their families) a social media proctologist probe like you've never seen before. I mean, we have folks believing there was a sex smuggling ring below a pizza shop.. do you really think that even if there's nothing in your social media that's problematic, they wouldn't invent something? And that it wouldn't stop with just online stuff? Two) (and more importantly), if you want to be on a jury for a trial, you're probably not impartial enough to be a fair juror. And to the 18 men and women on the jury? My condolences.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 21:59
|
|
|
Are you required to show your social media to the judge etc? Seems like an invasion of privacy, I think I'd refuse.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:05
|
|
|
Small White Dragon posted:Are you required to show your social media to the judge etc? Seems like an invasion of privacy, I think I'd refuse. There are jury consultants, a cottage industry of researchers, that will comb your public facing social media and other publicly available info and provide it to attorneys for voir dire (jury selection). Its not an invasion of privacy if a tenacious googler can find it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:10
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1781065638196183277?t=QkfM9i2ThcAsx6zjUC6IHQ&s=19 Merchan is sassy and I like it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:15
|
|
|
Small White Dragon posted:Are you required to show your social media to the judge etc? Seems like an invasion of privacy, I think I'd refuse. Something posted on a public forum for all the world to see does not have an expectation of privacy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:15
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Something posted on a public forum for all the world to see does not have an expectation of privacy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:20
|
|
|
Crows Turn Off posted:What if they made us show our SA post history.... Nobody on this forum will ever be a public figure. And perhaps that is for the best.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:31
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Something posted on a public forum for all the world to see does not have an expectation of privacy. Sure, although most of my social accounts are set to private/friends only. I don't know how common that is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:34
|
|
|
mdemone posted:Nobody on this forum will ever be a public figure. And perhaps that is for the best. A few already have been.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 12:53 |
|
|
mdemone posted:Nobody on this forum will ever be a public figure. And perhaps that is for the best.  to buy an account and archives would be an absolute bargain for destroying someone's political cereer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 22:41
|
|
