|
crazyvanman posted:Is it not also possible to have a level of respect for plants that is based not in trying to decide whether they are 'equal' to animals, but just that they are different? I tend to work with the logic: Avocados were going extinct before people started eating them https://www.avoseedo.com/how-the-avocado-almost-went-extinct/ Unfortunately, once the megaherbivores died off, avocados lost their main source of distribution. The remaining herbivores did not have large enough digestive tracts to consume and excrete the avocado pit, and dropping seeds at your own roots isn’t a very good survival strategy. At this point, avocados should have gone extinct. Why didn’t they? .... Avocado trees owe their continued existence to their unusually long lifespan and hungry humans. Central Mexico has avocado trees as old as 400 years of age. Because avocados live so much longer than other fruit trees, they were able to survive until another consumer, this time hungry humans, came along. The earliest humans in Central and South America quickly came to appreciate the avocado: in particular, the Olmecs and the Mayans. These groups started the first avocado orchards, picking the hardiest and best-tasting avocados to cultivate. Thus the avocado’s journey to worldwide cultivation and consumption began, saving them from a time when the avocado almost went extinct.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2023 03:15 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 11:47 |
|
TychoCelchuuu posted:This kind of argument with respect to animals is known as "the logic of the larder" and it is taken by many (myself included) to be very unconvincing (and I find it equally unconvincing in the context of plants). For some discussion see: I don't know if it matters, but I've been vegan for well over a decade. Also, in the case of avocados ... the tree doesn't die when you take the fruit. But back on topic, meat production is a climate issue more than plants.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2023 07:29 |