|
Pretendian, lol. Elizabeth Warren is indigenous to Ireland but St Patrick drove her ancestors out.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2022 11:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 20, 2024 08:28 |
|
CoolCab posted:... i categorized "giving significant valuable chunks of land back to the people who originally lived here" as the kind of utter impossibility that could never ever be remotely politically viable. people will not vote away their property and most indigenous populations are the minority. Respectfully, this is horseshit, and I would direct you to the New Zealand example. You probably need a population that's not incredibly racist first, but that's the obstacle not some property rights BS. If our financially overstretched government can compensate people I'm guessing Canada and the USA could too. AnimeIsTrash posted:For the time being though I think that demanding every piece of federal land back, and forcing the US government to adhere to treaties are both pretty reasonable demands. Do you genuinely believe it's reasonable to give 28% of the land in the USA to less than 2% of the population?
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2022 23:58 |
|
Tell it to my local tribe with over a billion in assets, including a bunch of land with more probably on the way.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2022 07:56 |
|
i say swears online posted:why will they be getting more land? repurchasing at market rate? They do have first option on a bunch of land they've identified as historically relevant but this is just ongoing Treaty of Waitangi settlement stuff. Terminal autist posted:You bring up a good point, despite being bizarrely defensive. The US governments treatment of certain tribes was way worse than other ones. One example comes to mind, the crow rez from my understanding is very resource poor compared to other tribes and as as result their percap payments are much much lower than other tribes. Most white people of course dont even bother to try to understand the nuances. Even if your local tribe has billions in assets that doesnt mean poo poo if its not being share equitably amongst the tribe. It is frustrating when you have just given an example of land back under capitalism for somebody to post that land back is impossible under capitalism. exmarx posted:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Waitangi_claims_and_settlements Of course not, but it's not clear to me that it would be beneficial to do so, effectively creating a new landed aristocracy. I meant it when I said I don't think American natives should be given all American federal lands. That is if you are talking about material losses, arguably the greatest losses have been cultural. e: That's not to say it has been enough. unwantedplatypus posted:Exactly what I was getting at This is a point I find very interesting, recently here we had a big protest initiated mostly by younger Maori about a decision made by the tribal authority regarding the disposition of some land. It seems to me that Maori governance structures could do with some change but taking a firm position on the matter or what that would look like I hesitate to say as a non-Maori. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ihum%C4%81tao Weka has issued a correction as of 01:29 on Oct 26, 2022 |
# ¿ Oct 26, 2022 00:26 |