Kurzon posted:

Is this really the same issue? Let me explain.

In large-coalition regimes, otherwise known as democracies, the leaders are incentivized to deliver public rewards. Public rewards are things which are enjoyed by everyone, such as good roads, good public education, civil liberties, etc. Public rewards have the effect of making the economy grow. Democracies tend to be more prosperous than autocracies. Past a certain threshold, members of the coalition in a large-coalition system actually want bring in new members to the coalition, because will put even more pressure on the government to govern responsibly, further growing the economy. Although everyone gets a smaller fraction of the pie, the pie grows larger, so everyone actually ends up with more.
Do you think Native casinos could exist in that state? That they could become a large coalition system where the members actually want to be inclusive?