Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ASAPI
Apr 20, 2007
I invented the line.

I really don't understand TikTok challenges.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ASAPI
Apr 20, 2007
I invented the line.

McNally posted:

What seems to have happened is that OP saw a YouTube video about Heinlein and had to tell people about it.

Then someone said this

And apparently OP took this to mean "go tell GIP what you learned"

Frankly, I'm offended that OP just copy/pasted what they wrote in the other thread. Self-plagiarism is still plagiarism and I deem you to have failed this self-assigned homework.

Oh, wow. This makes much more sense.

ASAPI
Apr 20, 2007
I invented the line.

Fivemarks posted:

So I can totally get the "Officers are bad" argument. Enlisted hate their officers generally, and a bad officer in the right position can spoil the whole pot by setting the wrong example and encouraging lovely politicking and bullshit instead of doing the job right.

So here's my question: What's the alternative, and what is a 'good' officer?

"Good" in what way? What is "good" on a strategic level may not be "good" on a tactical level. That is before we add in human elements and concepts like "leadership".

In general terms, a "good" officer is an officer that states the objectives (and any constraints) and sets their NCO corps loose to accomplish the mission while being available as an escalation point to remove blockers/provide more info/handle admin stuff/etc. Really, they are just kind of herding cats and pointing the mob in the generally correct direction.

When you read the "officer bad" stories, they almost always go further than my example above. They reach into the "gears" and make adjustments (micromanage), they get a message from the "good idea fairy" and attempt to "improve" something. Almost always, it is because they are trying to improve their "rating" that is completely arbitrary and subjective. We try to quantify things like "leadership", which is totally not an abstract concept...

Edit: post above me basically says the same thing, I bet you are going to get a bunch of these replies.

ASAPI
Apr 20, 2007
I invented the line.

CommieGIR posted:

Exactly. And it cannot be overemphasized: The US has a strong tradition of NCO leadership and a strong NCO corps. Russia, for example, has little to no NCOs.

We also have the magic sword of logistics.

American logistics have won wars and kept the troops happy/fed/supplied with Taco Bell in a warzone. We've seen what getting a random truck full of crap has done to Russian morale.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply