Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the most powerful flying bug?
This poll is closed.
🦋 15 3.71%
🦇 115 28.47%
🪰 12 2.97%
🐦 67 16.58%
dragonfly 94 23.27%
🦟 14 3.47%
🐝 87 21.53%
Total: 404 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Ardennes posted:

ATGMs are a big issue, it is just particularly the Javelin actually didn't perform as expected. The big issue for the Russians was tripod mounted Ukrainian-made ATGMs which had much heavier or tandem warheads.

The Javelin when attempting a top attack mode usually just hit the top of the sides of the turret, and it generally has a small warhead for an ATGM otherwise. It isn't ideal. The NLAW is even smaller. They could theoretically still do damage close range if targeting a specific point on a tank, but they also have a minimum distance as well (there are shots of frustrated Ukrainian soldiers fighting with it).

Hamas usually when they confront Israeli tanks they hit them with pretty huge HE/thermobartic warheads on their RPGs, and they come in extreme close range to target a specific point on the tank.

Drones are generally a much bigger issue.

Idk how Javelins performed, but seems like we also ran out.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

genericnick posted:

Idk how Javelins performed, but seems like we also ran out.

There was information coming out around them when they were being used, by the end, they seemed to be used mostly as a simple direct fire missile. Also, there technically are a couple around, you see them once in a while in store rooms, they have become pretty rare though and usually hoarded by political units or foreigners.

Soapy_Bumslap
Jun 19, 2013

We're gonna need a bigger chode
Grimey Drawer
(Ukraine is turned into global child sexual trafficking capital overnight the instant america gets the imf in)
Ha ha Russia bad

haddedam
Feb 19, 2024

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 17 days!)

Homeless Friend posted:

lmao seth put placeholder but never did anything for this one

Google it. The guys official callsign was "fagot", like the atgm system.
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-commander-liquidated-ukraine-drone-grenade-1876908

BrotherJayne posted:

Maybe we could not?

Dude's a loving creep and adds nothing to the conversation

I get it conversation is" usa worst nation in world, that has commited all the warcrimes in the world. Rest are based. Only americans allowed". Sorry.

haddedam has issued a correction as of 10:34 on Apr 19, 2024

DaysBefore
Jan 24, 2019


haddedam posted:

Google it. The guys official callsign was "fagot", like the atgm system.
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-commander-liquidated-ukraine-drone-grenade-1876908

I get it conversation is" usa worst nation in world, that has commited all the warcrimes in the world. Rest are based. Only americans allowed". Sorry.


Officer Sandvich
Feb 14, 2010

Soapy_Bumslap posted:

(Ukraine is turned into global child sexual trafficking capital overnight the instant america gets the imf in)
Ha ha Russia bad

A former Holyoke city councilor faced child porn charges. Now he’s apparently fighting for the Russian army.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007
we're about to teach this SOB why the victims of communism list is so long

Soapy_Bumslap
Jun 19, 2013

We're gonna need a bigger chode
Grimey Drawer
To fight a pedophile, you have to send a pedophile

fatelvis
Mar 21, 2010

genericnick posted:

Idk how Javelins performed, but seems like we also ran out.

I thought they were sent thousands of the things?

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003

Ardennes posted:

ATGMs are a big issue, it is just particularly the Javelin actually didn't perform as expected. The big issue for the Russians was tripod mounted Ukrainian-made ATGMs which had much heavier or tandem warheads.

The Javelin when attempting a top attack mode usually just hit the top of the sides of the turret, and it generally has a small warhead for an ATGM otherwise. It isn't ideal. The NLAW is even smaller. They could theoretically still do damage close range if targeting a specific point on a tank, but they also have a minimum distance as well (there are shots of frustrated Ukrainian soldiers fighting with it).

Hamas usually when they confront Israeli tanks they hit them with pretty huge HE/thermobartic warheads on their RPGs, and they come in extreme close range to target a specific point on the tank.

Drones are generally a much bigger issue.

it is quite funny that Health and Safety neutered the NLAW, but only goes so far that soldiers are still expected to get in the ajax but have to wear massive ear protection and still come out with TBIs

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007
Extrajudicial GBS ban turned down... but 30 day approved & that's the bottom line cause fluffdaddy said so

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

fatelvis posted:

I thought they were sent thousands of the things?

And now they're gone

Megamissen
Jul 19, 2022

any post can be a kannapost
if you want it to be

Homeless Friend posted:

Extrajudicial GBS ban turned down... but 30 day approved & that's the bottom line cause fluffdaddy said so

ftw

RedSky
Oct 30, 2023
Uhm the Russians have lost 1000s upon 1000s of tanks to st. Javelin remember?

RedSky
Oct 30, 2023

Homeless Friend posted:

Extrajudicial GBS ban turned down... but 30 day approved & that's the bottom line cause fluffdaddy said so

It was always a long shot I guess. Tyfys

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

BrotherJayne posted:

Many such posts, etc.



Or a double barn, where the turret gets its own shell atop the hull shell, like a Maus but functional.

Or one that drops a side and just shits out like 30 drones



A little dog shed to shelter the EW equipments.

Lin-Manuel Turtle
Jul 12, 2023

suck my woke dick posted:

i have bad news about the English my man. also this really isn't anything special about the US, any country that conquered its way to the top would do roughly the same, it's just that the US happened to be the big winner in recent history

the other gbs moron took a lot of attention but I wanted to recognize your contribution of the classic old sociopathic take of “if I didn’t kill all those people first someone else would have anyway” that pieces of poo poo love to trot out.

Sanlav
Feb 10, 2020

We'll Meet Again
what if all the barns could do a Voltron megastructure. C'mon Russia.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

haddedam posted:

He seems to be reprimanded rather than promoted for his actions which is how you know it's not russia.
Just don't google well documented russian baby rapist in Ukraine if you want to sleep ever again.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

if this isn’t the gbs freak who keeps getting banned for posting gore ill be amazed

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Lin Manuel-Turtle posted:

the other gbs moron took a lot of attention but I wanted to recognize your contribution of the classic old sociopathic take of “if I didn’t kill all those people first someone else would have anyway” that pieces of poo poo love to trot out.

more like countries aren't morally pure people and most of them are terrible

Egg Moron
Jul 21, 2003

the dreams of the delighting void

So, if congress passes the Ukraine funding, how does that translate into Russia no longer winning?

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

it won’t make a difference other than some Nazi warlords will have bigger bank accounts in the caymans

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Egg Moron posted:

So, if congress passes the Ukraine funding, how does that translate into Russia no longer winning?

Most of the bill is for stuff like supporting existing US forces in the region, humanitarian aid, and loans, there is also a bunch of money to replenish existing US stockpiles. There is military aid in there as well but it perhaps isn't tremendous.

I think part of it is just the US just doesn't have that much to send, and the aid presented in the bill isn't going to be covering stuff like fighter jets.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Is there any news of the F16?

And also what happened to the 2000 French troops?

speng31b
May 8, 2010

Homeless Friend posted:

we're about to teach this SOB why the victims of communism list is so long

your experiment produced an interesting result

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Supposedly, there is also 13 billion of "security assistance" to Ukraine in the package, but it is unclear how much of that is just the US paying itself back for support and training and how much of that is going to actual weapons for the Ukrainians. There is also another 1.6 billion of direct aid to the Ukrainian military.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Ardennes posted:

Most of the bill is for stuff like supporting existing US forces in the region, humanitarian aid, and loans, there is also a bunch of money to replenish existing US stockpiles. There is military aid in there as well but it perhaps isn't tremendous.

I think part of it is just the US just doesn't have that much to send, and the aid presented in the bill isn't going to be covering stuff like fighter jets.

Of the ~$61 billion in the Ukraine aid bill:

~14 billion for Ukraine to buy weapons for itself
~14 billion to fund purchases of new US weapons for Ukraine
~8 billion for the Ukrainian government
~1.6 billion for the Ukrainian military finances
~13 billion for the US to backfill stockpiles (which in turn likely frees up 4 billion in willingness to use the rest of the PDA)
~7 billion to fund US O&M costs for activities being taken in support of Ukraine, such as training, logistical support, intel support.

You can read the bill here: https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20240415/APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml.pdf

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

Jel Shaker posted:

it is quite funny that Health and Safety neutered the NLAW, but only goes so far that soldiers are still expected to get in the ajax but have to wear massive ear protection and still come out with TBIs

How did they make a vehicle so bad that everyone who rides in it gets tbi

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

OctaMurk posted:

How did they make a vehicle so bad that everyone who rides in it gets tbi

take an existing vehicle, slap poo poo on it to meet the requirements bullet points, forget to update the suspension now that it weighs twice as much

RIP Syndrome
Feb 24, 2016

BrotherJayne posted:

I wonder how long until we see decoy turtle tanks.

Or a double barn, where the turret gets its own shell atop the hull shell, like a Maus but functional.

Or one that drops a side and just shits out like 30 drones

Land carriers. Homeland: Deserts of Kharkov

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
There is 27 billion for "Operation and Maintenance Defense-wide" with 13 billion under the Ukrainian security assistance initative, but the terms of direct procurement for Ukraine is rather vague. In addition, that number includes not just procurement but again training and support.

Looking though it, it seems like it gives the DoD to use the funding at will to support operations, with procurement per branch marked out. The assumption is this would eventually be used to help the Ukrainians, but it doesn't seem the bill outlines that directly.

Also the Ukrainian security assistance initiatives is a training and support program with a portion of it used to supply weapon purchases.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 13:54 on Apr 19, 2024

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Zodium posted:

simpsons "russia flipping the name sign on the desk to reveal the ussr flag" but it's the united states revealing the union jack

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Ardennes posted:

There is 27 billion for "Operation and Maintenance Defense-wide" with 13 billion for Ukrainian security assistance, but the terms of direct procurement for Ukraine is rather vague.

In addition, that number includes not just procurement but again training and support.

That's why I broke it down for you to provide more clarity. Or you can read the whole bill, but it's pretty dry.

USAI falls under O&M for some budgetary reason. It does not fall under "procurement" because "procurement" means procuring items for the US to possess. The US govt paying companies to build things for Ukraine is an operation. The US government buying equipment for itself is procurement.

For further budget wonk poo poo, a lot of the procurement is FOR the DOD, but has the leash that what is procured must remain available in stocks for donation to Ukraine, as needed/approved in the future, for a set amount of time.

In the bill, they put a subheading to specify that O&M includes transfer of funds to make it easier for the reader to understand.

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022


Homeless Friend posted:

we're about to teach this SOB why the victims of communism list is so long

hell yeah

lumpentroll
Mar 4, 2020

Homeless Friend posted:

we're about to teach this SOB why the victims of communism list is so long

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

mlmp08 posted:

That's why I broke it down for you to provide more clarity. Or you can read the whole bill, but it's pretty dry.

USAI falls under O&M for some budgetary reason. It does not fall under "procurement" because "procurement" means procuring items for the US to possess. The US govt paying companies to build things for Ukraine is an operation. The US government buying equipment for itself is procurement.

For further budget wonk poo poo, a lot of the procurement is FOR the DOD, but has the leash that what is procured must remain available in stocks for donation to Ukraine, as needed/approved in the future, for a set amount of time.

In the bill, they put a subheading to specify that O&M includes transfer of funds to make it easier for the reader to understand.

The issue is for example the USAI wasn't simply for weapon purchases but also training and support as well. In addition, in the text, they specify this also includes: "imbursement for defense services of the Department of Defense and military education and training, provided to the government of Ukraine or identified and notified to Congress for provision to the government of Ukraine or to foreign countries that have provided support to Ukraine at the request of the United States."

This allies to the total funding as well as specifically USAI funding.

Dancer
May 23, 2011
I am having an exchange with a normie in my personal life. Can someone who has a better grasp of the scale of these things tell me some guidelines for the following two questions? Are these ratios closer to 2:1 or 20:1?

- how much aid Ukraine got for free vs how much came via loans
- the "real value" of the aid they get vs the nominal value (since, like in the 61 billion mentioned above, "aid" will often come in the form of the US obtaining the stuff, handing it over, then promising this is totally 10 billion worth of stuff bro)

Edit: I see that some recent posts directly contradict the model I have suggested. Evidently I'm confused and might benefit even more from some answer. Obviously I know no one can give me a fixed number.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

how is any of that relevant. they don’t have an army

Dancer
May 23, 2011
I am trying to help them understand what Ukraine got back for the small price of most functional bits of their country. Our media tells us how we're helping the Ukrainians out of the goodness of our hearts.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sanlav
Feb 10, 2020

We'll Meet Again
The CFR report is so ideological at this point. They did an accounting of the war in february that amounts to fantasy. They list all these appropriations of arms without counts or delivery involved. It's a sliver of a sliver of the overal package, only a portion got to Ukraine, all of it is nearly spent, and whats on the way in no way meets their needs. Yet they conclude we're doing the best, bang up job ever in supporting a war effort and a teensy bit more will slay Ruussia.

Mearshimer had a debate with Dobriansky last week that was just abysmal. Every talking point she made was this wishful thinking. She keeps countering every material weakness on the ground with "but we could send more and close that gap" ignoring the material realities abound.

There is no time, there is no productive capactiy, wishing and hoping time is long gone. If they need 5 million 155mm shells a year to fight Russia, either we deliver 5 million shells now or face the music. There's no tomorrow, but our official policy planning has no urgency. They are looking at it as a long term stalemate still.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdtCyiKHtqE

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply