Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

antidote posted:

That second Japanese goal absolutely should not have stood. That said, Flick is a moron and should gently caress off.

the ball was still in play though

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

antidote posted:

Explain? If the ball was fully over the line how was it in play? I'm legitimately asking, because do I have a misunderstanding of the rule?

If the ball was fully over the line then it wouldn't be in play. The ball wasn't fully over the line so it was in play

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

antidote posted:

To me that is a questionable call. Obviously we can't change it, and maybe it's the angle, but... I dunno.

Assuming that's the frame where the ball is furthest out then it's still in play, but that's fair. Ultimately the call on the field was it was fine so it'd be on the var to find a frame where it was all the way out to overturn

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016

I'm still not entirely sure what the call on the field was tbh. It didn't come from the linesman but I didn't get the impression the ref called for a goal kick right away. Looked like there was confusion all around.

Either way, var got the call right which is what it's there for I guess.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply