|
antidote posted:That second Japanese goal absolutely should not have stood. That said, Flick is a moron and should gently caress off. the ball was still in play though
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2022 22:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 14:05 |
|
antidote posted:Explain? If the ball was fully over the line how was it in play? I'm legitimately asking, because do I have a misunderstanding of the rule? If the ball was fully over the line then it wouldn't be in play. The ball wasn't fully over the line so it was in play
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2022 22:36 |
|
antidote posted:To me that is a questionable call. Obviously we can't change it, and maybe it's the angle, but... I dunno. Assuming that's the frame where the ball is furthest out then it's still in play, but that's fair. Ultimately the call on the field was it was fine so it'd be on the var to find a frame where it was all the way out to overturn
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2022 22:47 |
|
I'm still not entirely sure what the call on the field was tbh. It didn't come from the linesman but I didn't get the impression the ref called for a goal kick right away. Looked like there was confusion all around. Either way, var got the call right which is what it's there for I guess.
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2022 00:28 |