Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Bertha the Toaster
Jan 11, 2009
This is from someone on Reddit claiming to be Jeff's wife.

quote:

Legally, I can't talk much about it at the moment, but NHRL went above and beyond trying to slander and disqualify Supreme Ruler and the team. We'll have more information made public soon.

And then there's this from Reddit;


If they thought he was over-pinning, why didn't the refs say anything? In that last fight against Jamison, Jamison just kept driving straight at the middle of the bot, he didn't go for the other bot/minibot which I feel was the way to beat them there as that was the thing doing all the damage.

Bertha the Toaster fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Nov 12, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord
I mean. Much as I've usually loved Behind the Bots, the stream, and the hosts - I feel like Luke harping on Full Court and Supreme Ruler during the stream turned from funny and entertaining early on to... Well, mean-spirited and driving negativity... by the finals. I like opinionated hosts, but there's a time and place.

Like - the kid who won with Full Court deserves to enjoy his victory. And it was clear he was nervous as hell. Luke having complained about his bot for the whole competition and being clearly, if more silently, exasperated about the win, was fueling the toxicity in the YouTube comments, from what I could see. Up to and including some rear end in a top hat buying a Super Chat about how the victory wasn't earned.

Maybe I'm dreaming - but if the hosts had all been more positive about these meta-breaking designs yesterday and pushing for changes when in the off season, the whole thing may have gone down differently. I dunno.

Bertha the Toaster
Jan 11, 2009
What got me was them harping on about how static forks were old and how everyone is going to switch to cam lifters like Supreme Ruler was using. And then they got pissed that Supreme Ruler was being Supreme Ruler.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord
Two sides to every story. Here's Jeff's.

https://imgur.io/a/cZ4rx0K

He's likely leaving off why his teammate got expelled, though. Just not sure if that was before or after being disqualified.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

dwarf74 posted:

Two sides to every story. Here's Jeff's.

https://imgur.io/a/cZ4rx0K

He's likely leaving off why his teammate got expelled, though. Just not sure if that was before or after being disqualified.

Yeah, he's talking past whatever incident made a staff member feel unsafe. He claims it was all because of action in the fight. I dunno, seems unlikely that in-fight stuff could get you totally kicked out of the event unless like a winning bot reduced a losing bot to scrap while they were incapacitated or something.

Maybe Jeff's unaware of what happened between his team and the staff? It sounds like they screamed at the staff or something along those lines.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Bertha the Toaster posted:

What got me was them harping on about how static forks were old and how everyone is going to switch to cam lifters like Supreme Ruler was using. And then they got pissed that Supreme Ruler was being Supreme Ruler.

Those lifters are a very cool idea. It's nice to finally know how that Ace minibot for Jackpot works, because you really couldn't tell what it was doing in the big arena.

At the same time, those lifters make for extremely unentertaining fights.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

No dog in this fight but who told them they were disqualified for threatening and unsportsmanlike behavior then asked to do a exhibition lol

Event sounds like a shitshow on the coordinators' ends

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

RBA Starblade posted:

No dog in this fight but who told them they were disqualified for threatening and unsportsmanlike behavior then asked to do a exhibition lol

Event sounds like a shitshow on the coordinators' ends

The league founder. That part doesn't make any sense either. You've spooked our staff, and they're afraid of you now, so you have to leave. Also please stay and do another fight for no money.



I don't know what NHRL's rules are for pins, but you can see the fight in question here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=live?v624a4_oY7w&t=13248s

PostNouveau fucked around with this message at 16:44 on Nov 12, 2023

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

RBA Starblade posted:

No dog in this fight but who told them they were disqualified for threatening and unsportsmanlike behavior then asked to do a exhibition lol

Event sounds like a shitshow on the coordinators' ends
I'm guessing it goes like this -
* This one guy is expelled from the event
* You're responsible for him, so this disqualifies your team.
* The rest of you can stick around if you want and do this exhibition thing.

Step 3 feels kind of out of touch, lol

Bertha the Toaster
Jan 11, 2009

PostNouveau posted:

Those lifters are a very cool idea. It's nice to finally know how that Ace minibot for Jackpot works, because you really couldn't tell what it was doing in the big arena.

At the same time, those lifters make for extremely unentertaining fights.

I hope they don't make a rule against them, because they are the hard counter to the ground game that we've needed. Imagine a bot like Yeti, those forks would've done nothing. I want the lifters to at least make the ground scraping bots think twice.

As for the pinning rule, I tried looking but couldn't really find anything on it. If you count lifting a bot as pinning then he probably was doing it before the 3 seconds had elapsed. But is that really any different than driving a wedge bot under the opponent?

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Please come get your bot destroyed for zero chance of prize money. You gotta pay for the parts at least, NHRL, come on now.

If the pin rule is 3 seconds of disengagement before the next pin, he was not doing that against Silent Spring. The ref should really give him instructions in the moment though.

is pepsi ok
Oct 23, 2002

The "if this happened in a restaurant" part seems especially ridiculous. It didn't happen at a restaurant, it happened at a professional sporting event. Coaches and players yelling at officials about calls they don't like is a standard thing that happens in every sport, and in any other sport it would be unconscionable to DQ an entire team before the finals because one person got heated.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Bertha the Toaster posted:

I hope they don't make a rule against them, because they are the hard counter to the ground game that we've needed. Imagine a bot like Yeti, those forks would've done nothing. I want the lifters to at least make the ground scraping bots think twice.

It would be great with a kinetic weapon, but now you're talking about trying to get a third motor into a bot and still make weight.

ante
Apr 9, 2005

SUNSHINE AND RAINBOWS

is pepsi ok posted:

The "if this happened in a restaurant" part seems especially ridiculous. It didn't happen at a restaurant, it happened at a professional sporting event. Coaches and players yelling at officials about calls they don't like is a standard thing that happens in every sport, and in any other sport it would be unconscionable to DQ an entire team before the finals because one person got heated.

Nah, I've been part of hackspaces, which have similar demographics and culture to these events, I'd imagine.

It's not a sports game*, it's a bunch of sweaty nerds, and you gotta stamp out lovely behaviour quick, or it'll gently caress up your culture. There's no winning for the administration that has to do the banning, either. It invariably leads to butthurt and conspiracy theories as we've already seen in this thread. But it's the least bad option, and you'll lose a lot more really good people if you don't.


"why do you think that's acceptable in sports games too? Just because it's the status quo doesn't mean it should be okay

is pepsi ok
Oct 23, 2002

ante posted:

Nah, I've been part of hackspaces, which have similar demographics and culture to these events, I'd imagine.

It's not a sports game*, it's a bunch of sweaty nerds, and you gotta stamp out lovely behaviour quick, or it'll gently caress up your culture. There's no winning for the administration that has to do the banning, either. It invariably leads to butthurt and conspiracy theories as we've already seen in this thread. But it's the least bad option, and you'll lose a lot more really good people if you don't.


"why do you think that's acceptable in sports games too? Just because it's the status quo doesn't mean it should be okay

Because it's an inherent part of competition. Like I'm sorry but the notion that nearly every sport has a hosed up culture because competitive people get heated is just silly.

Edit: or I guess you can just DQ any team that has someone get emotional and see what kind of culture that gets you

is pepsi ok fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Nov 12, 2023

ante
Apr 9, 2005

SUNSHINE AND RAINBOWS

is pepsi ok posted:

Because it's an inherent part of competition. Like I'm sorry but the notion that nearly every sport has a hosed up culture because competitive people get heated is just silly.

Edit: or I guess you can just DQ any team that has someone get emotional and see what kind of culture that gets you

Are you minimising threats of physical violence lol

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

ante posted:

Are you minimising threats of physical violence lol

The restaurant quip there makes it sound like they got loud, not that they threatened anyone. That's not being asked to leave the restaurant - that's calling the cops.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
You can't run an event like that without a bunch of staff, and most of them are probably doing it for a love of the game rather than whatever they're getting paid. They shouldn't have to put up with threats or screaming or anything like that.

And lots of sports have hosed up cultures, but there isn't a one where you can get away with treating the staff badly. You go too far with a ref at a football game, you're getting tossed.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

PostNouveau posted:

You can't run an event like that without a bunch of staff, and most of them are probably doing it for a love of the game rather than whatever they're getting paid. They shouldn't have to put up with threats or screaming or anything like that.

And lots of sports have hosed up cultures, but there isn't a one where you can get away with treating the staff badly. You go too far with a ref at a football game, you're getting tossed.

Yeah. Either toss the offending person and the team keeps playing, or eject the team. The event hosed up asking them to keep going.

ewe2
Jul 1, 2009

Bad decisions made in the heat of the moment, nonsensical justifications afterwards, sounds like a sport :v: The problem here is that it was one guy deciding and it needs to be more than one guy deciding. Even if it's still a bad decision at least more than one person can cross-check the information.

NHRL to me seems to be suffering from a lack of crew resource management, too much hierarchy, not enough team. No one to challenge the founders decision or at least point out that ejecting the SL team and subsequently asking them to join the rumble isn't exactly A1 decisionmaking. And it probably goes deeper than that in the organization. This should be a teachable moment.

edit: Just rewatching the end of the match where Supreme Ruler beat Silent Spring and Kyle is literally being the Dog in Everything's Fine, completely petulant because the Wrong Bot Won.

ewe2 fucked around with this message at 21:05 on Nov 12, 2023

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

is pepsi ok posted:

Because it's an inherent part of competition. Like I'm sorry but the notion that nearly every sport has a hosed up culture because competitive people get heated is just silly.

Edit: or I guess you can just DQ any team that has someone get emotional and see what kind of culture that gets you
Most participants describe it as basically Robot Bake-Off.

Intense competition is the exception.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord
Sorry for the double post. But here's some details.

It deals directly with the "punched badge" issue.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NHRL/s/uZ4aKILAHf

quote:

Update posted this morning:
> KellyBiderman — Today at 9:49 AM EST
> Last night, a credible allegation of collusion was brought to my attention after a match involving Supreme Ruler had taken place.
>
> The specific allegation was related to a series of warnings and demerits that were issued to members of the Supreme Ruler team at two separate points in the tournament, and whether or not members of the team had attempted to hide or dispose of a “punched” badge in order to conceal an earlier demerit. A referee and two witnesses recalled Supreme Ruler’s badge being “punched” after its fight vs. Chubby Unicorn. A different referee and two witnesses recalled Supreme Ruler’s badge being punched after its fight vs. Silent Spring. According to our rules, this second infraction would result in a match forfeit.
>
> Per our protocols, the allegation prompted an investigation, which involved pausing any related matches while our team conducted interviews with witnesses and competitors.
>
> Over the course of two interviews, both of which I personally led, and which were also witnessed by members of NHRL’s full-time and part-time event staff, I asked the members of the Supreme Ruler team to confirm their account of their interactions with the referees as they related to these demerits. During the second interview, a member of the Supreme Ruler team made intimidating statements and used threatening body language that was specifically directed toward me.

Up to this point in the investigation, we were still in “discovery” mode, attempting to get an accurate account of what had happened by speaking with all involved parties. Because the investigation was ongoing, we had not arrived at - and throughout the course of the interview in no way communicated or implied - any judgment, decision, or consequence regarding the allegations. The only line of inquiry during the interview attempted to line up witness accounts with the accounts of the Supreme Ruler team. There was no assessment whatsoever about the team’s in-arena conduct or the justification of any demerits, such as whether or not there were any match rule violations. In-match conduct was only indirectly related to this investigation.

That said, the team member’s tone and actions over the course of the interview were a clear violation of the NHRL Builder Conduct Policy. Per the terms of the BCP as well as the waiver participants agree to at the time of registration for each tournament, any attempts to threaten or intimidate members of NHRL staff are prohibited and can result in removal from the tournament and our Discord server. NHRL exercised its right to remove the member of the team from the tournament. We also exercised our right to remove that team member from our Discord server; An internal miscommunication resulted in the captain of Supreme Ruler being removed from our Discord server erroneously, which was quickly reversed a few minutes later.

NHRL’s security team escorted the team member from the premises. I then escalated the situation to Austin, who subsequently managed all interactions with the remaining team member.

While the captain of Supreme Ruler did not personally engage in intimidating behavior and was not asked to leave the premises, as a team captain, they are ultimately held accountable for the sportsmanlike conduct of their teammates. As a result of their teammate’s conduct, Supreme Ruler was deemed ineligible to win the tournament. The investigation into collusion was suspended for the evening. The captain of the team was offered the chance to compete with their opponent, but were informed that they would be ineligible to receive any cash prize or prize donation. The captain declined this offer.

We strive at NHRL to provide a welcoming environment for everyone, and a culture of good sportsmanship is foundational to that mission. We understand the competition is intense and the stakes are high. We have an engaged and opinionated community that feel passionately about this sport, from its top-level philosophies through to its most intricate details. That said, we do not tolerate conduct that threatens or intimidates members of our staff.

We are proud of the members of our community who competed with us in 2023 and traveled from around the world for yesterday’s World Championships. We saw incredible fights and had so many amazing conversations with builders who were in awe of the quality of the competition both in and outside of the arenas. We appreciate your support and look forward to hosting all of you again in 2024.

dwarf74 fucked around with this message at 22:46 on Nov 12, 2023

The Modern Leper
Dec 25, 2008

You must be a masochist

dwarf74 posted:

Sorry for the double post. But here's some details.

It deals directly with the "punched badge" issue.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NHRL/s/uZ4aKILAHf

That's helpful. The initial issue was worthy of investigation, but I don't understand how it would have been collusion.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Yeah that account makes sense of a lot of it. It sounds like they never did get to the bottom of the alleged collusion to hide demerits, and it was pretty tone deaf of them to ask Supreme Ruler to fight a finals they couldn't get prize money from. But all the rest of it sounds reasonable.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

The Modern Leper posted:

That's helpful. The initial issue was worthy of investigation, but I don't understand how it would have been collusion.
He was apparently crew on another bot so had a 2nd badge? I dunno.

But... Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this sticker covering another hole punch? It definitely looks like it to me anyways.

Or are there other punches for other purposes?

Bertha the Toaster
Jan 11, 2009
I assume the hole punch is the one on the left, if so that's much bigger than the sticker.

Borsche69
May 8, 2014

Bertha the Toaster posted:

This is from someone on Reddit claiming to be Jeff's wife.

And then there's this from Reddit;


If they thought he was over-pinning, why didn't the refs say anything? In that last fight against Jamison, Jamison just kept driving straight at the middle of the bot, he didn't go for the other bot/minibot which I feel was the way to beat them there as that was the thing doing all the damage.

I kinda thought he wasn't backing away far enough at the start, but it became extremely evident over the course of the fight that silent spring could not move for poo poo. I don't know if the flamethrower actually burned the legs on the walker enough that it couldn't get any traction, or if it just was a drive train issue in general, but supreme ruler couldve backed away to the other side of the arena and waited a full 20 seconds and silent spring probably wouldn't do much

Borsche69
May 8, 2014

Bertha the Toaster posted:

I assume the hole punch is the one on the left, if so that's much bigger than the sticker.

Yeah. I also feel like trying to move a 'safety inspection pass' sticker is almost way too stupid for someone to think of doing. I don't know if that's naive of me, but it makes more sense trying to just hide the badge that got the initial demerit.

Though this begs the question why they're spreading demerits across multiple team badges if the culmination of demerits result in an expulsion. If there's code of conduct stuff wherein you can toss an individual team member, and not the whole team, it makes sense. But if everyone's representing the team, and an individual's code of conduct violation reflects the entire team, there should only be one badge (team captain) that you actually punch.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord
NHRL 2024 rules just dropped. I am not a roboticist but it looks like they're un-loopholing a few loopholes - mainly around weight limit stacking and MAYBE to the not-really-weapons one?


---

Here are the major rule changes impacting bot design for 2024!

These rule changes affect bot builds, so we are releasing them now. We will release other rule changes soon, but none of those changes will affect your bot build. They will be more about how we run registration, qualifying, and tournaments in 2024.

The descriptions below are summaries. For more details, go to the wiki: https://wiki.nhrl.io/wiki/index.php/2024_Bot_Design_Rule_Changes. We will have a new rulebook later in the year, but we wanted to release these rule changes now so that you can build towards them.

We know that we are releasing these rule changes after many of you have begun designing your bots for January. We appreciate your patience, and hope that your design for January is smooth!

**WEIGHT BONUS UPDATES**
* We will still have our weight bonuses for Non-Traditional Locomotion (NTL) and for multibots. However, we are reducing the maximum total weight for each weight class. Even with both bonuses, a total bot entry may not weigh more than this.
* For 3lb, a total bot entry may not weigh more than 5 lbs.
* For 12lb, a total bot entry may not weigh more than 20 lbs.
* For 30lb, a total bot entry may not weigh more than 50 lbs.
* Additionally, some of our weight bonuses are changing.
* For 3lb, the NTL bonus is going down to 1.5 lbs.
* For 30lb, the Multibot bonus is going up to 12 lbs.
* At least 51% of the weight of a multibot must be on bots with active weapons.

**WEAPON SYSTEM WEIGHT DISPENSATIONS**
Any bots with hydraulic-, pneumatic- or ICE-powered weapons systems will be weighed “dry” (without fuel).

**CLARIFY “ACTIVE WEAPON” DEFINITION**
For a weapon to be active, it must be independently operated from the drive system of the robot, and clearly be designed to influence the opposing robot. NHRL safety inspectors will determine whether a weapon is an active weapon as part of the safety inspection process.

**JUDGING CRITERIA CHANGES**
* We will update our judging criteria to specify that multibot damage is averaged across all bots. This is a change from how we currently judge, where we make small modifications for the damage to a multibot.
* If a bot successfully pins their opponent but is unable to release the pin without house bot intervention, this counts against their overall control score.
* In a situation where Bot A pins one multibot segment of Bot B, it would gain control points. If another segment of Bot B were to attempt to pin Bot A into the already pinned portion of Bot B, that does not gain control points.
* If a bot or any portion of a multibot spends a significant portion of the fight avoiding engagement, this will negatively impact the entry’s overall aggression score.
* To the degree practical, the overall aggression score for a multibot should be the average of the scores assigned to each individual segment.
* There will be a few other criteria changes that will be announced along with tournament rule changes.

Here are some other changes that we’re making. Please go to the wiki page to read more about them. https://wiki.nhrl.io/wiki/index.php/2024_Bot_Design_Rule_Changes
* Increased sanctions for deliberate arena fouling. (Glitter/bubbles/confetti are not considered arena fouling.)
* More defined weapon lock rules
* Safety-limited fuels (like flamethrower fuel) aren’t considered damage when they run out
* No more weight tolerance for overweight bots
* Minibots no longer have a special distinction - all bots with minibots are considered multibots

El Fideo
Jun 10, 2016

I trusted a rhino and deserve all that came to me


dwarf74 posted:


**CLARIFY “ACTIVE WEAPON” DEFINITION**
For a weapon to be active, it must be independently operated from the drive system of the robot, and clearly be designed to influence the opposing robot. NHRL safety inspectors will determine whether a weapon is an active weapon as part of the safety inspection process.


Did they mean to ban Meltybrain bots? Because I feel like that's happened.

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

El Fideo posted:

Did they mean to ban Meltybrain bots? Because I feel like that's happened.
Gil in the discord said those remain an exception, as do bristle-drive bots

SLICK GOKU BABY
Jun 12, 2001

Hey Hey Let's Go! 喧嘩する
大切な物を protect my balls


El Fideo posted:

Did they mean to ban Meltybrain bots? Because I feel like that's happened.

No, there's more to the rules than what dwarf posted.

"Any bot that uses its weapon as its drive (torque drive, bristle drive, gyro walker, etc.) are permitted, as are meltybrains. Thwackbots are still not permitted, unless they have some sort of active weapon."

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

SLICK GOKU BABY posted:

No, there's more to the rules than what dwarf posted.

"Any bot that uses its weapon as its drive (torque drive, bristle drive, gyro walker, etc.) are permitted, as are meltybrains. Thwackbots are still not permitted, unless they have some sort of active weapon."
I just copied from the post in the Discord :shobon:

SLICK GOKU BABY
Jun 12, 2001

Hey Hey Let's Go! 喧嘩する
大切な物を protect my balls


dwarf74 posted:

I just copied from the post in the Discord :shobon:

Oh, well then the person that put the rules in the discord left some stuff out :shobon:

MikeNCR
Oct 11, 2003

The discord post was covering changes to the rules, not the full ruleset, so stuff that didn't change (but was related to/closely followed the changed text) wasn't included.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
It doesn't seem like they came down as hard on the uber-control bots as people thought they would.

MikeNCR
Oct 11, 2003

PostNouveau posted:

It doesn't seem like they came down as hard on the uber-control bots as people thought they would.

Yeah, I think there's a perception that NHRL doesn't like control bots, which isn't the case at all.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

MikeNCR posted:

Yeah, I think there's a perception that NHRL doesn't like control bots, which isn't the case at all.

People maybe think the broadcast team being snarky about control bots making for bad TV means the whole organization doesn't like them.

And that dude's got a point on the broadcasts, but NHRL also seems to have a culture of encouraging builders to try out new designs.

AtraMorS
Feb 29, 2004

If at the end of a war story you feel that some tiny bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie
Was there a case of deliberate arena fouling that prompted that change? I remember the Valkyrie driver's bot carved a really rad 3/4 circle in one of the floors but I can't remember anybody messing anything up on purpose.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dwarf74
Sep 2, 2012



Buglord

AtraMorS posted:

Was there a case of deliberate arena fouling that prompted that change? I remember the Valkyrie driver's bot carved a really rad 3/4 circle in one of the floors but I can't remember anybody messing anything up on purpose.
I remember a compressed canister of insulation foam. Maybe that?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply