|
yeah its intentionally structured to resemble our code base, warts and all, to provide an accurate representation of the job to candidates
|
# ? Feb 16, 2023 18:01 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 03:49 |
|
here's how i get jobs: 1. get annoyed at work 2. do some interviews because why not, maybe i'll want to move soon 3. oh an offer, it's better than what i have 4. now that's my new job if you have a long take home, there is basically zero chance i will interview you unless i'm in a really bad situation (unemployed or desperate to leave). if it's a little hour long test on hackerrank or whatever, sure, but real takehomes? nah. no way. there are people that similarly reject whiteboard interviews out of hand. but i don't give my employer outside-of-work hours, there's no way i'm giving that time to some company that doesn't write my checks unless i really have to. if you want to fly me to a place and give me a couple nice meals and a hotel room to chat nerd poo poo for a few hours? yeah that sounds nice ive never job hunted in the new teleconferencing interview world, though
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 06:01 |
|
I think long take-homes are inherently disrespectful to the applicant's time. Really any sort of asymmetric thing where the applicant spends significantly more time than the company does. Four hours of interviewing sucking up four hours of company employee's time is better because the company is actually putting significant skin in the game, and is less likely to be jerking you around because it's also their own money they're wasting.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 06:08 |
|
ill let you guys in on my secret Three Steps to Wealth plan, as long as everyone agrees to keep it secret, ok? here goes 1) Get a job 2) Get a better job 3) Repeat step (2) as necessary ok? ok. lets just keep that between us.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 06:31 |
|
rotor posted:ill let you guys in on my secret Three Steps to Wealth plan, as long as everyone agrees to keep it secret, ok? lmao at this guy exchanging labour for wealth instead of just rent seeking
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 07:00 |
|
rotor posted:ill let you guys in on my secret Three Steps to Wealth plan, as long as everyone agrees to keep it secret, ok?
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 11:02 |
|
I feel like take-home tasks filters out sane, well-adjusted people who have lives. I'd almost go as far as saying it discriminates against people with kids or families.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 12:12 |
|
dougdrums posted:I feel like take-home tasks filters out sane, well-adjusted people who have lives. I'd almost go as far as saying it discriminates against people with kids or families. working as designed
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 14:20 |
|
one might even say it self-selects for those with real passion
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 16:14 |
|
no!!!!!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2023 17:47 |
|
Dijkstracula posted:By the four hours, I had a bunch of mechanism that I thought would show off, per Git Apologist's definition, that I'm not insane nor out of my depth, but turns out that the specific parts that the hiring staff engineer wanted to see were the things I put off in the README, and he actually kind of tore me a new one in the phone screen for it. wtf i hope you told that guy to gently caress off. i wouldn't put up with being "torn a new one" by someone i didn't even work for.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2023 03:06 |
|
qsvui posted:wtf i hope you told that guy to gently caress off. i wouldn't put up with being "torn a new one" by someone i didn't even work for. after the call I absolutely told the recruiter that because of this I had no interest in continuing the process (which culminated in one of the co-founders calling me to apologise and smooth things over, which, was appreciated even if there was no world in which it would work)
|
# ? Feb 19, 2023 17:02 |
|
rotor posted:ill let you guys in on my secret Three Steps to Wealth plan, as long as everyone agrees to keep it secret, ok? I really hate the process involved in step 2.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2023 17:13 |
|
what if you’ve basically peaked
|
# ? Feb 19, 2023 20:17 |
|
then you need to add a couple of steps 4. die 5. be reincarnated with rich parents
|
# ? Feb 20, 2023 09:52 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nY_cy8zcO4
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 14:21 |
|
quote:open source is an ecosystem of people trying really hard to keep the web and all of software development alive thank god for open source, otherwise software development would die
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 18:42 |
|
if the maintainers are frustrated maybe they should just stop maintaining things???
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 18:44 |
|
ban open sores software if it means the web goes away
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 18:44 |
|
i was trying to take the high road but i just cant this dude looks like he's wearing someone elses hair as a wig
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 18:48 |
|
rotor trying to play off the facts its his video
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 18:57 |
|
the mismatch between the bleached hair and the dark moustache is really grating for me
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:00 |
|
if I was compelled to make a ten minute video every time I got mad at something I read on a web forum, you people would never let me have a moment's respite
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:01 |
|
and whatever is goin on here
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:01 |
|
anyway, open source still fundamentally broken, please dont contribute, if you feel you must contribute please read the manifesto, thank u for ur time https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h__zP17eMoSXntHq6Jo7nKxRB8DoCOcVZ794Qd4LEA4/
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:03 |
|
writing a manifesto about how the parts of speech supply chain shortage is leading people to say things like "getting started with dev" and "open source is not a place to go"
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:07 |
|
rotor do you have reckons on GPL3 as opposed to AGPL? I typically publish my research code under the latter unless I'm building off existing projects that are under a different licence that I'm required to use, but you mostly reference the former in the context of "if you must"
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:12 |
|
idk the details, just basically the more restrictive the better
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:14 |
|
if you absolutely must just throw your code to the wind, the ideal license is like “you may read this but never actually compile or use it in any way”
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:16 |
|
rotor posted:and whatever is goin on here would totally buy this av for you if yours wasnt so good
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:18 |
|
HamAdams posted:would totally buy this av for you if yours wasnt so good
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:36 |
|
aaag
|
# ? Jan 18, 2024 19:57 |
|
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 01:31 |
|
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 02:42 |
|
read back over the thread and im all mad again
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 02:59 |
|
anyway i posted that video because i thought rotor wouldnt like it
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 03:49 |
|
fart simpson posted:anyway i posted that video because i thought rotor wouldnt like it i mean we're both discouraging people from doing open source so as far as that goes i got no beef with him wrt that the dudes whole look though is a different story
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 04:41 |
|
we truely need to weigh all sides. watch this video and lets discuss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVBygF9T4-w
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 06:31 |
|
fart please stop posting videos from your subscription list
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 03:49 |
|
sounds like you didnt watch the video. its only 90 minutes
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 06:38 |