|
Young Freud posted:Why does the Speaker have to be 218? Why can't it be just simple majority? Seems like the party with the most cohesion and unity should be the ones to run things. It is simple majority, there are 434 house members right now so 218 is a majority
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 03:52 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 08:42 |
|
Young Freud posted:Why does the Speaker have to be 218? Why can't it be just simple It can. And it has happened in the past . But you have to have 218 people vote to change the rules to let it happen. The house isn’t allowed to vote on anything else until they elect the speaker so usually when people get tired and bored that starts to be talked about as an option.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:10 |
|
BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:It can. And it has happened in the past . But you have to have 218 people vote to change the rules to let it happen. The house isn’t allowed to vote on anything else until they elect the speaker so usually when people get tired and bored that starts to be talked about as an option. Problem is, the same people who are blocking McCarthy would love nothing more than to spend the next two years grandstanding instead of doing any work.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:11 |
|
Angry_Ed posted:Not sure if the Republicans are ready for 2 years minimum of "GOP-led House has no balls"-based headlines. In less than a decade the US could go from having a Speaker of the House who everyone used to call "Boner" to one that literally has no dick
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:20 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Problem is, the same people who are blocking McCarthy would love nothing more than to spend the next two years grandstanding instead of doing any work. Golden, Peltola & Cuellar could be yes on a plurality vote and honestly increase their chances of getting re-elected (not the speaker vote.) Flip two of the guys holding him up or two more centrists and it’ll be whichever person gets the most votes (which comically leads to Jefferries being elected speaker)
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:21 |
|
Young Freud posted:Why does the Speaker have to be 218? Why can't it be just simple If you don't have a majority you don't have any defense against a vote of no confidence. Like... this isn't even some unusual americanism i'm pretty sure MOST countries have their lower house leadership needing a true simple majority. Sure as noted above you can have people vote to change the rules but that still at least ends up with a simple majority FOR THAT which establishes a majority of people who, if not able to directly agree on the speaker, can at least agree that they want there to be A speaker and probably aren't going to have an endless cycle of no confidence votes -> speaker with only plurality support -> no confidence vote.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:24 |
|
reignonyourparade posted:If you don't have a majority you don't have any defense against a vote of no confidence. Like... this isn't even some unusual americanism i'm pretty sure MOST countries have their lower house leadership needing a true simple majority. Sure as noted above you can have people vote to change the rules but that still at least ends up with a simple majority FOR THAT which establishes a majority of people who, if not able to directly agree on the speaker, can at least agree that they want there to be A speaker and probably aren't going to have an endless cycle of no confidence votes -> speaker with only plurality support -> no confidence vote. It’s really cool to have this happen in a country with no system for early elections
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:33 |
|
Some good background here. Every single one of his enemies are taking their shots. The Dems rolling up with the popcorn at the end is perfect. https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/1609881706420387844 quote:Finding consensus among the ‘Five Families’ quote:McCarthy gets backup, while conservatives sharpen their knives quote:No clear ‘Plan B’ if McCarthy’s stumbles Can't imagine the impasse lasts though. Gaetz will definitely yuck it up with a big poo poo eating grin and the rest of the holdouts will drag McCarthy over the coals for as long as the crowd from Spartacus keeps cheering them on but after a few news cycles most will get bored/tired of kicking a dead horse, even one as kickable as McCarthy. The two months mentioned from the other times a speaker wasn't chosen sounds like the limit of what you can expect before the worm turns and too many people start angrily asking what these House Reps are doing with all their free time on the tax payers dime.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 04:57 |
|
So.... the US House of representatives convenes on January 3rd, and their 1st order of business (and only order of business forever and ever until they finally elect a speaker) is to vote for the speaker. That should be fun.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 05:29 |
|
I like that the Democrats can muck this up and make things as hard as possible simply by coming to work. Tomorrow should be funny.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 05:47 |
|
cr0y posted:I like that the Democrats can muck this up and make things as hard as possible simply by coming to work. That is my only wish: comedy. Give me maximum comedy.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 05:58 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:That is my only wish: comedy. Give me maximum comedy.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:00 |
|
So do all of the calculations involve Santos voting for McCarthy? What happens if he resigns and then McCarthy suddenly no longer has the votes to stay in power? Could we go through this again in a few months?
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:02 |
|
We're getting an event that hasn't happened for a hundred years. McCarthy is going to be destroyed live on cspan and every politics junkie in the country/world gets to watch. This is the kind of humiliation that made people kill themselves rather than bear it and that was before every second of it was recorded for eternity.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:09 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:That is my only wish: comedy. Give me maximum comedy. If we have to live though this, it might as well be *funny.*
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:09 |
|
I think he will get the votes ........eventually
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:15 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:So do all of the calculations involve Santos voting for McCarthy? What happens if he resigns and then McCarthy suddenly no longer has the votes to stay in power? Could we go through this again in a few months? Just as a general reminder for everyone, the Speaker of the House of Representatives in the United States is like the pope. Basic poo poo in the lower house in the US just works under the assumption that the office is filled. If there's no speaker, NOTHING happens in the lower house. The house has to have a speaker, period. If they don't have a speaker for any reason, they have to elect one, majority vote rules, voting over and over again, forever and ever until they have one.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:20 |
|
Rigel posted:If they don't have a speaker for any reason, they have to elect one, majority vote rules, voting over and over again, forever and ever until they have one. Big "break room" vibes from severance
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 06:22 |
|
If it gets dragged out a month they could be doing the same thing over and over again on Groundhog Day.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 07:13 |
|
borkencode posted:If it gets dragged out a month they could be doing the same thing over and over again on Groundhog Day. I really wish those assholes would just plainly and clearly let us all know how much of a clusterfuck this is going to be. If this should be TVIV'd, great but if we put up a big effortpost those assholes would probably troll us by obediently lining up behind McCarthy for at least a couple days.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 07:40 |
|
Rigel posted:I really wish those assholes would just plainly and clearly let us all know how much of a clusterfuck this is going to be. If this should be TVIV'd, great but if we put up a big effortpost those assholes would probably troll us by obediently lining up behind McCarthy for at least a couple days. Hell, maybe we need a TVIV/D&D crossover thread just for CSPAN tomorrow...
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 08:01 |
|
Shooting Blanks posted:Hell, maybe we need a TVIV/D&D crossover thread just for CSPAN tomorrow... If you (or anyone else here) are volunteering to make some kind of a grand effortpost US House Speaker TVIV vote thread for tomorrow/today that eventually just ends up being a disappointing wet fart, then go on right ahead. The United States political media does seem to be just all a flutter right now for what will probably end up being a stupid disappointment. And that could be amusing for us as well.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 08:24 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:In less than a decade the US could go from having a Speaker of the House who everyone used to call "Boner" to one that literally has no dick That already happened
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 08:50 |
|
Please try to be just a little bit less weird and gooney, thanks.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 09:01 |
|
How many votes would a Democrat need to be elected speaker? Because at this point, I'm half-convinced the dems could retain the Speaker of the House just because of how the Republicans are so disorganized in the house at the moment.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 12:30 |
|
Randalor posted:How many votes would a Democrat need to be elected speaker? Because at this point, I'm half-convinced the dems could retain the Speaker of the House just because of how the Republicans are so disorganized in the house at the moment. This is not happening. Period.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 12:46 |
|
Randalor posted:How many votes would a Democrat need to be elected speaker? Because at this point, I'm half-convinced the dems could retain the Speaker of the House just because of how the Republicans are so disorganized in the house at the moment. The number is 218 no matter who. There is no path for a Democrat because above all else the Republicans are disciplined to not give the Democrats anything ever.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 13:44 |
|
Sounds like one of the Democrats needs to come up with an epic West Wing speech owning the Republicans with facts and logic and gathering their shamed votes.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:07 |
|
projecthalaxy posted:Sounds like one of the Democrats needs to come up with an epic West Wing speech owning the Republicans with facts and logic and gathering their shamed votes. Sorry, even the idiotic centrist opinion writer class isn't even to come up that strong of a scenario https://twitter.com/NormOrnstein/status/1609953698884554754
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:20 |
|
The Freedom Caucus putting out a marker: https://twitter.com/repscottperry/status/1610260382903603206?s=46&t=9fraFK0x-7hBIYksUiihrg Going to be a fun day!
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:23 |
|
Mooseontheloose posted:The number is 218 no matter who. There is no path for a Democrat because above all else the Republicans are disciplined to not give the Democrats anything ever. Yeah, that's fair. Though the Dems only need 4 people to throw in with them, so they may be able to get the least-bad Republican (for dems, anyways) into the role. Bonus points if those 4 people are some of the extreme right-wing loons that didn't do the math before voting for the Democrat's Republican choice as a statement against McCarthy and accidentally elect someone not-terrible to the role.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:35 |
|
When do we get to start live streaming this poo poo
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:46 |
|
C-Span says 12 eastern
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 14:54 |
|
Piell posted:Sorry, even the idiotic centrist opinion writer class isn't even to come up that strong of a scenario There’s been rumors that McCarthy would prop up an alternative centrist candidate in the event he fails to gently caress over Scalise. Upton has been rumored to possibly be that candidate. But those are just rumors and I don’t think McCarthy is smart enough or vicious enough to go through with it and this is the lamest loving way to do it.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:10 |
|
cr0y posted:I think he will get the votes I'm not sure about that because the hardliners have said they'd take Jeffries as speaker before McCarthy. If 20 of them vote present that's enough for Jeffries to squeak by quote:In a private meeting yesterday, Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Scott Perry (R-PA) told Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) that they don’t mind if the speaker vote goes to plurality and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) is elected because they will fight him, Punchbowl News reports.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:31 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:I'm not sure about that because the hardliners have said they'd take Jeffries as speaker before McCarthy. If 20 of them vote present that's enough for Jeffries to squeak by loving do it freedom caucus. Give the Democrats control of the house again.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:33 |
|
Honestly even if it was the Dems + 5 Rs we would reduce the risk of default and at least fund the government if nothing else. The budgets would be meh but at least they'd be budgets with Dem priorities in them rather than "Burn the Elderly for Fuel Act of 2023"
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:36 |
|
Speaker Jeffries would be handy, but even then I hope we only get it after at least a week of hilarious disaster.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:40 |
|
As a plus, Speaker Jefferies Scenario would also permanently kill the take that GOP are master political strategists rather than evil morons
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 15:48 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 08:42 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:Honestly even if it was the Dems + 5 Rs we would reduce the risk of default and at least fund the government if nothing else. The budgets would be meh but at least they'd be budgets with Dem priorities in them rather than "Burn the Elderly for Fuel Act of 2023" The Republican energy platform: Burn the Elderly then let one car get electrified.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2023 16:00 |