|
Im fast and go bi too OP
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 06:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:44 |
|
|
vroom vroom 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 07:55
|
|
|
Time is relative like velocity is relative. If you are floating in space not moving (in your inertial frame), then you accelerate to some velocity and maintain it, you are now not moving again in your inertial frame. Similarly, when you accelerate your concept of time also shifts with your inertial frame. To you it seems normal (“not moving”), but relative to your starting inertial frame it is moving slower.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:04
|
|
|
It’s like op has never heard of a Lorentz transformation 🙄
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:08
|
|
|
Whatever you do don't build a device that creates a black hole for your ship to pass through.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:09
|
|
|
nanomachines
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:15
|
|
|
it’s kind of like the doppler effect, when the sound changes as (for example) a car or train is travelling towards you, when it is coming towards you the sound waves are compressed so the sound is higher but when it is travelling away from you the sound waves are now getting increasingly further apart so the sounds is stretched out and sounds weird, think of the nyeeeeooooooooon of an f1 car blasting past but in the car the sound is always the same because you are in moving at the same speed relative to the car time dilation can be thought of as conceptually similar, it takes ‘longer’ for a static observer to perceive travel at fast speed (in the same way you hear the ‘same’ sound differently as a car speeds past) than it does for the person doing the fast travel. it’s hosed up op but general relativity has been proven experimentally repeatedly, loving einstein did a good one there
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:15
|
|
|
note: i’m an idiot
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:15
|
|
|
its all nice on rice posted:Whatever you do don't build a device that creates a black hole for your ship to pass through. too late
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:17
|
|
|
If you are near a wormhole and in luck, it is possible to have sex with yourself, even at a distance. This process has been termed "spaghettification" and also why Italians can't go into space. Thank you for coming to my symposuium.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:40
|
|
|
buglord posted:ological aging get sped up too? Everyone knows the speed of light is constant. But constant to what? What does it measure its speed from? Turns out: its you It moves at that speed relative to you. Q: But how can 1 person not moving, and another one moving, see some light travel at the same speed? A: Time is relative.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 08:41
|
|
|
op hasn;t seen flight of the navigator. appalling
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 11:57
|
|
|
hey blimpo oink oink https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRVzJXaj4lw
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 12:00
|
|
Borrowed Ladder posted:But what if I whip around this neutron star? You'll become part of it hella quick
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 13:43
|
|
|
Ludicrous speed makes you go into plaid. Hope that helps, OP.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 14:05
|
|
|
Wilkins Micawber posted:If you are near a wormhole and in luck, it is possible to have sex with yourself, even at a distance. This process has been termed "spaghettification" and also why Italians can't go into space. Thank you for coming to my symposuium. If you find just the right spot at the edge of a black hole you can stretch your dick and/or tits out really far
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 14:37
|
|
|
BAGS FLY AT NOON posted:If you find just the right spot at the edge of a black hole you can stretch your dick and/or tits out really far This is really making me think
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 14:39
|
|
|
That accretion disk? All dick
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 14:44
|
|
|
I think historically science has assumed that the gravitational wave only exists as far as its field of capture, but it’s more likely that is an extended and continuous membrane that extends as a complex voltage tensor all the way to the quantum median distance between two stars. So as you traverse into microgravities and your velocity approaches the speed of light, regardless of your acceleration profile, there is only one point at exactly 0 gravity where time stops as you move from one relativistic frame to another. There’s essentially a Latin interpretation of your origin clock to the new frame of reference that takes a round minute. It could be anywhere from 1 second to 60 seconds of net time that you age more than anyone else, it is always a random number. But you aren’t gonna age as in the twin paradox. The gravitational wave always preserves your real clock in a relativistic manner, and the stream of light you are riding ACCELERATES as gravity decreases, as do you.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 15:08
|
|
|
Like, you can look at it this way. A good ship will get to its destination up to a minute BEFORE it left. A perfect charter will reach its destination exactly WHEN it left. Did the good ship go faster? No. Its Boolean electronic expression did, but its analog took just as long. There has to be a viable groundpath for a good ship or it will abort and return to origin before it crosses the membrane, as if it never left at all. Or like, in the instance that someone was trying to test a good ship by launching and landing in the same spot, it would simply never launch until the return destination was moved at least a mile away. A loopback type scenario would mean the ship never launches at all, but it could for instance, show up a mile away before it was launched, before the copy could be reached from the origin by any physical or electronic means and cause an entropy violation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 16:00
|
|
|
If you want the perception that time is slowed and you want to live effectively long as possible, you simply have to physically torture yourself in novel everchanging ways. Time will seem to stretch on forever if you are always experience and new and horrible pain
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 16:05
|
|
|
Time goes real slow when you're really bored, so if you want to live a long time just be really boring and bored
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 16:54
|
|
|
it’s basically the same as when goku trained for a year in the hyperbolic time chamber but everyone else only aged a day
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 16:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 17:04
|
|
|
You need to remember time is actually really bad at maths and often gets it wrong. So when you accelerate it will seem to change, but as time is bad at math it will just be by random amounts. somtimes it will be .5 of second gained, sometimes three years lost. It's basically totally random. This is the main reason why space travel is so dangerous. might come back 90 years older, might come back as a baby who knows which!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 17:16
|
|
|
I think we need to define “space” as the volume between stars where the gravitational wave exerts less force than half the original weight of the individual atoms in the integrated grounpath, less than the amount of force required to influence one hydrogen atom of the originating star, and the gravitational wave is the exact integral function of the corresponding lightwave of origin, so that a vessels heft and mass are carried as digital information until transformed by a voltage tensor, so that a continuous current of one ampere is maintained throughout the complex transformation and no G forces are incurred by the acceleration. 
ClamdestineBoyster fucked around with this message at 17:32 on Feb 9, 2023 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 17:28
|
|
|
Bula Vinaka posted:Light photons do not experience time. The universe begins and ends in an instant for a light photon. So perspectives aside, you’re still going to age in the same timespan, even if it doesn’t appear that way?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 18:14
|
|
|
Common sense would tell you the faster you go the less time it takes you to get there.  If you build a ship that’s already fast your acceleration profile is instant and it takes you one minute to get there. If you build a ship that’s swift it takes you zero time to get there. The light from other stars takes a little over 7 days to reach earth, one exact quartmoon, to reach us, depending on how long that solar systems annual Christmas is. Which also directly corresponds to that stars pH, which is always slightly sour, unless it is in a nova/condensate/new star state (base), pulsar (neutral), or the relative natural consummate (sweet) which is not visible to the naked eye (falloscopic), but will be the native 5th planet of our own solar system in the future (levoscopic). ClamdestineBoyster fucked around with this message at 18:49 on Feb 9, 2023 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 18:16
|
|
|
buglord posted:So perspectives aside, you’re still going to age in the same timespan, even if it doesn’t appear that way? From your perspective your light speed vehicle makes everyone else die of old age quickly 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 18:25
|
|
|
I think what’s cool is that you can overcome the radio delay if you know your deoxyribonucleic targets ram address, which is the sum of the decimal value after 7 expressed as a whole number value, which yields a specific and unique RAM address. You can simply dire a chemical telephone line that has no delay and can transmit Boolean data at 1 gb/s.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2023 19:18
|
|
|
Okay so I talked to some people and they say that space is time and it’s hard to really separate those. I guess there was a flaw in the question I presented with them: How much would earth age, relative to me, if the following happened: I leave earth in 2023 and fly at the speed of light for 20 years, then I come back? If I’m hypothetically 20 years older, how much older is earth, and why did my speed somehow break the connection of time here?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 06:33
|
|
|
If you go at the speed of light, you can reach any point in the accessible universe instantly from your point of view. All distances become 0. You can imagine what that implies for your 20 years trip. The earth would be long gone, alongside basically everything else. The "reason" this happens is basically because everything is immobile from its own point of view. If two objects are appart by a meter and are not moving relative to one-another, light takes the same amount of "time" to go from one to the other no matter how fast they are moving relative to everything else, on account of them going "I'm not moving, it's everything else that's moving around me". The weird time stuff is the only way we know how to make the math work around that. There's no reason for it that we can tell. As far as we know, it's just a matter that poo poo can't make sense otherwise. Aramis fucked around with this message at 07:19 on Feb 10, 2023 |
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 06:44
|
|
|
Time dilation happens when you get on a train too, but you don't see the conductor bragging about it In any case if you ever find yourself traveling at the speed of light you got bigger problems to worry about lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 06:59
|
|
|
buglord posted:Okay so I talked to some people and they say that space is time and it’s hard to really separate those. I guess there was a flaw in the question I presented with them: At the speed of light time is meaningless. But let’s say you go a significant fraction of the speed of light, like 99.9% of it. When you get back, you’ve aged 20 years, but the earth has aged billions of years. No trace of human life survives except you. Your speed didn’t break time, your acceleration caused a rotation of your spacetime axis. What was previously the time component of your vector through spacetime has mostly changed to become your speed component in space.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 07:50
|
|
|
In space, there is (almost) nothing to slow you down. It's not like on Earth where the engine has to keep going or you'll slow down. You'll keep going anyway. So if you keep the engine on you just go faster and faster. But nothing can go faster than the speed of light. But even if you are close to the speed of light, if you keep the engine on, you'll go faster. Both of these things are always true, so to keep them all true, the universe does some wonky-rear end bullshit with time. Honestly, it sounds like cheating and should never have been allowed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 08:18
|
|
|
The thought experiment with the moving cart did the trick for me. All you really need is a little pythagoras to do the math. Blurry Gray Thing posted:In space, there is (almost) nothing to slow you down. It's not like on Earth where the engine has to keep going or you'll slow down. You'll keep going anyway. One of the weird things about relativity is that as you go faster your mass also increases. So for a hypothetical engine with a fixed power output, it would have an upper speed limit that it wouldn't be able to exceed, simply because it would have to push on an ever increasing mass. I think it stems from the good ol' E=MC^2 formula. in conclusion if Sonic ever goes too fast he'd collapse under his own mass and turn into a black hole
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 10:32
|
|
|
The faster you are, the fatter you get. So the only way to lose weight is stop moving completely, possibly crawl backwards at negative speed of light.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2023 13:41
|
|
|
Einstein was a dumbass none of that poo poo is true op it’s all part of Big Science’s scam to get more funding.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2023 16:13
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-gEApuaNM
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2023 17:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:44 |
|
|
A cool way I saw it described in a book by afaik a Real Science Guy (Max Tegmark, 2000-whatever) was - everything is always travelling at the speed of light, but proportions vary as to how much of that velocity is movement through space vs movement through time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2023 01:49
|
|
