Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
TraderStav
May 19, 2006

It feels like I was standing my entire life and I just sat down

emanresu tnuocca posted:

The important difference here is that West Ham in the show is privately owned, Rupert owns it, he's not some official in some sporting or academic organization which has some semblance of democracy or public oversight, it's his team, he owns it, under certain extreme conditions the club could be sanctioned to the point where Rupert is forced to sell it, which is what happened with Chelsea (the UK gov declared Chelsea to be an company with known ties to the Putin regime and that any dealing with the club must receive special approval from the UK government, all sponsor deals were suspended and the club couldn't sign new players or negotiate with the existing staff, they did get a special permit to participate in the premier league and other competitions though).

I think for Americans who are used to teams basically being 'licensed franchises' that have a license to operate from the league governing body this is a bit strange because strangely enough american sports are hella socialist but in the UK and most of europe clubs are really just privately owned companies, the FA doesn't get to take the name 'West Ham' and give it to someone else or something like that, it's not theirs.

I chose to think of it that he was going to receive insane pressure from the fanbase to sell the club because of the accusations, moreso than any governing body taking it away from him. May not have been realistic, but let me move on and just enjoy it from there.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TraderStav
May 19, 2006

It feels like I was standing my entire life and I just sat down

fullroundaction posted:

Was just thinking about if this was a real show, getting the Head Coach from your main rival's team a few games before the championship (or whatever) would be such a big deal for ya know, using everything he knows from coaching the team to defeat them. But of course that doesn't come up once.

I don't know sports. Is there anything that would have (contractually/NDA, etc) prevented Nate from moving to a team like that mid-season for the reasons I stated above?

Nope, there's restrictions on players being able to field against a former club in a competition in the same season (like Champions League) I believe, but nothing for Managers.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply