|
seriously the degree to which it is an incredibly robust language model is very impressive. but it's only that, and if you try to ask it any other question--math, science, even programming--it becomes outright hilarious how much nonsense it repeats back to you
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 15:40 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 14:52 |
|
People aren't moved by "You wouldn't steal a car", they're moved by "You wouldn't steal a livelihood"
|
# ¿ May 14, 2023 20:46 |
|
SCheeseman posted:Not moved enough to get rid of the thing that has repeatedly caused the destruction of livelihoods every time another job gets automated or obsoleted, apparently. My brother in Christ are you dragging people for being unable to destroy capitalism?
|
# ¿ May 15, 2023 23:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/heykody/status/1662168390352666624?t=Fa8UUnCg31HHrPGtTZStXQ&s=19 https://twitter.com/heykody/status/1662168475668996096?t=m6aclo4K_QDzvD7a8mHtxA&s=19 https://twitter.com/mrgreen/status/1663107572902027265?t=kmVYbV5VlMVwvvRz107gRw&s=19 I appreciate ai art supporters doing a better job of showing how much it sucks than its detractors ever could
|
# ¿ May 31, 2023 00:20 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:How can anyone seriously look at one of these examples from the new photoshop ai fill thing and conclude “yep this is proof that ai generated art is all crap.” the threads talking about expanding images for famous paintings and album covers were all universally poo poo and illustrative of an incredible ignorance of the basic concept of composition
|
# ¿ May 31, 2023 12:55 |
|
BrainDance posted:Do you think people actually think it made the paintings better? i can only go on what people replying to the threads have said, and my words seem to adequately those people also the bolded here is just straightup wrong, the expanded imagery is so much worse than the original works its actually painful
|
# ¿ May 31, 2023 13:07 |
|
SaTaMaS posted:It's more that people point to hallucinations as a reason for why LLMs can't be considered intelligent. ....LLMs are not entities capable of intelligence
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2023 02:10 |
|
Tei posted:Maybe part of the reason the human brain is so slow is because is mechanical. Biological cells must actually build new connections and chemistry changes (molecules) actually have to move. as you have been told repeatedly, you are massively anthropomorphizing LLMs. hallucinations are more accurately described as poor text predictions
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2023 12:18 |
|
The Artificial Kid posted:Not really, I'm arguing that human beings also have things that could be called "prediction anomolies". That's almost exactly what's meant in a bayesian approach to perception and hallucination https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/142/8/2178/5538604. You get why this is insanely tedious to read and argue about, right? You have next to zero evidence for this belief beyond vibes! You are not experienced with the development of LLMs, you have no training with the study of human intelligence, or even the philosophy of intelligence! You just constantly put forth arguments that lack basic rigour but they sound mildly plausible to you, so it's becomes our task to convince you why this is not the case! A big flaming stink fucked around with this message at 03:44 on Dec 18, 2023 |
# ¿ Dec 18, 2023 03:41 |
|
The Artificial Kid posted:I have a bachelors and a masters by research in psychology with a focus on cognition and pre-attentional information processing. Inferior Third Season posted:Everyone is free to post here, regardless of credentials. look im not trying to resort to credentialism as lord knows i dont got a leg to stand on either in that regard. but we need more than vibes to go on, you know?
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2023 11:26 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 14:52 |
|
I thought it was pretty well established that the proliferation of ai art is what creates the risk of model collapse. They trained these things on a shitload of data and it's rather up in the air if they're going to be able to keep doing that without scraping the products of their own models
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2024 13:16 |