Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Waffle House
Oct 27, 2004

You follow the path
fitting into an infinite pattern.

Yours to manipulate, to destroy and rebuild.

Now, in the quantum moment
before the closure
when all become one.

One moment left.
One point of space and time.

I know who you are.

You are Destiny.


012924_6 posted:

This A.I. Respects No Math

This Machine Kills Deeply To Fact

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Waffle House
Oct 27, 2004

You follow the path
fitting into an infinite pattern.

Yours to manipulate, to destroy and rebuild.

Now, in the quantum moment
before the closure
when all become one.

One moment left.
One point of space and time.

I know who you are.

You are Destiny.


Boris Galerkin posted:

Ansys, the engineering analysis software suite that pretty much every single engineering company in the world uses, wants to put ChatGPT into their products. Or rather, they have already done so and want to expand AI features.

You are an engineer and specialist in hypersonic cruise missiles. Here is access to my entire design catalogue please design me a better missile.

I mean most surely that’s how the execs think it works but lmao.

Is there any kind of security against researchers traipsing through accessible ontology to find backdoors into cached and firewalled content? Like could I just couch the prompt correctly to encourage the model to go right through pytorch on the back end and spit out a bunch of classified results?

Waffle House
Oct 27, 2004

You follow the path
fitting into an infinite pattern.

Yours to manipulate, to destroy and rebuild.

Now, in the quantum moment
before the closure
when all become one.

One moment left.
One point of space and time.

I know who you are.

You are Destiny.


Kagrenak posted:

Each inference instance is going to have independent resources. I doubt they'd reinforcement train their hosted models against the new data or anything insane like that. The risk profile would probably be similar to any other cloud service, which is to say pretty high for classified data. I would also imagine that if people are using this software in a classified mode, that module would be disabled or only work using some sort of on-prem edge node for model inference. Some laboratory software is like this, certain functionality turns off if it's not supported in the 21 CFR 11 compliant mode.

Okay, so there is actually bulwark, that's fantastic. Although it'd be very cyberpunk and GET ME MY GOGGLES, the ability to back-alley your way around into everyone's topology would probably uproot some scary things.

Waffle House
Oct 27, 2004

You follow the path
fitting into an infinite pattern.

Yours to manipulate, to destroy and rebuild.

Now, in the quantum moment
before the closure
when all become one.

One moment left.
One point of space and time.

I know who you are.

You are Destiny.


RPATDO_LAMD posted:

This is definitely untrue, the very first thing that went viral with copilot was using it to generate the infamous "fast inverse square root" function from Quake III, which is open source nowadays but is licensed under the very restrictive GPL2 license.

A business that included this function in their product could easily be sued for copyright violation unless they complied with the GPL2 terms, including things like a requirement to open source their own code and allowing others to redistribute it for free.

https://twitter.com/StefanKarpinski/status/1410971061181681674

Note that it won't generate this any more but only because this particular code snippet was so famous that Microsoft explicitly blacklisted it. There's still the potential for it to regurgitate other, less-recognizable code from its dataset that's also copyrighted under restrictive licenses.

lol ontology

Copilot just like look man, someone gave me proper justification and everything, I see nothing wrong here.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply