|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I've been a D&D user for twenty years and you guys have made it a sterile soulless shell of what it once was. I greatly resent the debate-club style application and enforcement of rules that ignore any and all context. It's what people used to mock D&D for, and Koos and his team have ironically turned it into a reality. Or maybe it was cynically done on purpose. Harold Fjord posted:I think what's been lost is a fuckton of smart left leaning posters who got sick of being punished constantly. It's happened over years and not necessarily the fault of Koos and his team. It's also possible that the smart left leaning posters got sick of those who merely cosplay as leftists constantly making GBS threads on them for not being pure enough.
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2023 20:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 01:08 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:At this juncture, one of the actions needed is to actively re-solicit the groups of educated users that were driven out of the forum over the past 6 or so years. The lawyers, the scientists, the people who used to make discussion viable in greater detail. Per Bar Ran Dun's comment, we now face an active negative stereotype of DnD, continuously reinforced elsewhere, whenever there's an attempt to have someone from anywhere else on SA participate. I strongly agree with this.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 01:52 |
|
Turgid Flagella posted:Lib and let died. Please do not insult cranky, cantankerous assholes by referring to yourself as one.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 01:57 |
|
Judgy Fucker posted:But as you mentioned, Aegis, the War thread is drama-free, even if it's a terrible space to actually discuss the War. I think this is the gist of the issue with D&D's new moderation scheme under Koos: the Prime Directive, if you will, has been to try to minimize conflict and drama, even if it comes at the expense of everything else, including good discussions and overall thread activity. This is why so many threads in D&D are mere shadows of their former versions: mods have cracked down on anything and everything that can remotely result in a large number of reports they need to sift through and adjudicate. As a result, most posters have stopped participating, because what they want to talk about has been deemed off-limits (due to drama potential) and they don't want to get probated. The baby has been thrown out with the bathwater. This is a really good example of how optimizing policies to improve the metrics (i.e. reducing the number of reports) may not produce outcomes that are actually optimal. cinci zoo sniper posted:Procedurally, however, mods are not required to assume good faith of every single post, to address that question as well, as in no mod is under an obligation to be naive. Assuming good faith is part of D&D's rules (specifically, rule I.B.) , and mods should be required to follow them as well.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 16:51 |
|
Honestly cinci zoo sniper, you seem a bit too emotionally invested (and extremely strongly opinionated) in the topic of ChatGPT/AI and that makes you a poor choice for thread moderator. Even before Koos took over, it was strongly frowned upon for moderators to actively moderate threads they were also participating in. The reasons should be obvious. I think if you continue posting in that thread, you should agree to do so without your mod hat on. Pick someone to IK the thread and stay out of any moderation decisions.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 18:00 |
|
socialsecurity posted:This seems odd to me, everyone wants mods to be more part of the community but them to also not moderate threads they post in? It sounds like the issue is that CZS appears to be moderating discussions in which they themselves are active participants in, and it comes in the form of probating/silencing their debate opponents. And yes, that has been frowned upon and discouraged for a long time now.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 18:05 |
|
Rosalind posted:I am going to be so egotistical as to assume that I might be one of the people you're referencing here. To be honest, I am not going to return to posting in D&D probably ever. It's not fulfilling. Cocaine Mitch posted:I posted here for years but finally about a year or so ago I gave up and left because I was sick of how people could be such massive jackasses all the time and there were absolutely no repercussions. It was exhausting and mentally draining. Leaving this site was the best thing I've ever done for my own mental health and I honestly advocate everyone else to leave too. This place is a shithole that can't be saved. These posts remind me of the poster who revealed that they had a PhD in economics, and within minutes they were compared to a cop and a drone bomber.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2023 22:55 |
|
Turgid Flagella posted:'Debate' generally implies the presence of more than one opinion being presented - what it sounds like the most terminally academia-brained posters want is a strict form of discussion that only recognizes the validity of what can be validated through the accepted thoughtschools of "liberal" capitalist doctrine, elementary, high school, and college curriculum pumped out of privately-held textbook companies with a stake in upkeeping the capitalist order. Just because people don't want to debate your frankly unhinged opinions doesn't mean they are "terminally academia-brained" — whatever the gently caress that means.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2023 00:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 01:08 |
|
Harold Fjord posted:
Nobody is conflating political opinions with assholery. The type of poster we do not want or need in D&D is the "cranky, cantankerous rear end in a top hat" (quoting Turgid's own description of themselves) who cannot conceal their contempt and vitriol for their fellow posters when they debate them.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2023 16:28 |