|
astral posted:Uploading without an account is the only way I've ever used it. Still worked via the API last I checked. Chinatown posted:their image editor loving sucks poo poo now
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 08:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 14:49 |
|
|
It honestly owns how many people consider internet poo poo as a valuable public service they are entitled to and not just a hacky scheme by some tech bros to harvest your datas
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 08:04
|
|
|
Much like the fall of the Byzantine Empire, the loss of that one dick pic I posted in 2013 that was shared three times in mockery will be felt for eons to come.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 08:05
|
|
|
Delete the rest of the internet too please Especially the post after this one
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 08:11
|
|
|
If this post gets deleted I’ll know I’m shadowbanned and get real upset online @ Jeffrey
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 08:49
|
|
|
"hey guys, I have a great idea. What if we took the awful choices of Photobucket, and the awful choices of Tumblr, and combined them?" the grand internet clown show marches ever onwards
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 09:03
|
|
|
Beartaco posted:That's a real loving panicky tweet for some incredibly vague messaging. It will make older SA threads basically unreadable. It's Waffleimages all over again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 09:16
|
|
|
Colonel Cancer posted:It honestly owns how many people consider internet poo poo as a valuable public service they are entitled to and not just a hacky scheme by some tech bros to harvest your datas Who said this? People aren't saying they're entitled to it, just that they've enjoyed it and it sucks that it's changing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 09:19
|
|
|
Google Jeb Bush posted:jokes aside, i wasn't aware you *could* post images to imgur without logging into an account I didn't even know you could have an account until last month. All of my uploads via the Awful app aren't tied to an account.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 10:10
|
|
|
I’ll just keep uploading to my SnapFish account tyvm
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 10:38
|
|
|
putin is a oval office posted:It will make older SA threads basically unreadable. It's Waffleimages all over again. Right, according to some guy on twitter. The actual release explicitly says "unused, inactive content."
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 11:12
|
|
|
Yeah, in an ideal world what's actually going to happen is that they'll be all SELECT * WHERE DATE_LAST_REQUESTED < '01-01-2020' AND USER_ACCOUNT IS NULL
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 11:20
|
|
|
It's like when poo poo breaks for
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 11:24
|
|
|
It just sucks that they never had a clear policy/warning from the beginning, like "this image will be auto deleted after 4 years from this date." That would have been better for everyone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 11:30
|
|
|
Devils Affricate posted:It just sucks that they never had a clear policy/warning from the beginning, like "this image will be auto deleted after 4 years from this date." That would have been better for everyone. originally they did, it was that uploads would be deleted if they got no views for six months then they changed the retention to "forever" in 2015, then they changed their minds now
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 11:53
|
|
|
If theyre gonna do this dumb thing, they should just say all old images would be archived forever, but starting now things not uploaded on an account would not stay up longer than a month or whatever The porn thing though, that's never gone well for anyone and it rules(sucks) that it keeps happening
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:00
|
|
|
Jeff please buy imgur
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:31
|
|
|
Smugworth posted:Jeff please buy imgur No; it's time to jump-start Waffleimages 3: The Search for Waffleimages 2
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:42
|
|
Beartaco posted:Right, according to some guy on twitter. Which is a vaguely defined term. What does that mean? How long is that? It could mean anywhere from 2013 to last week for all we know.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:52
|
|
|
if they were smart like me they would instead rationalise their storage by having just one photo of goatse, one image of nude shrek, one pair of tits. they could instantly deduplicate their whole database and reduce their expenses. hire me imgur
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:55
|
|
|
Gasmask posted:if they were smart like me they would instead rationalise their storage by having just one photo of goatse, one image of nude shrek, one pair of tits. they could instantly deduplicate their whole database and reduce their expenses. That's what I've always wondered, do they check for duplicates?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:57
|
|
|
how did you guys pronounce it? imm-grrrrr? im-ih-jur? I'm-gur?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:58
|
|
|
Beartaco posted:Right, according to some guy on twitter. How often do you think old SA archive threads are read? And no, it's not according to "some guy on twitter", literally the content of the actual release suggests this will be the case. You seem to be very well informed on this unlike the rest of us absolute idiots and drones, so as the guy who knows what's going on, by all means fill us in on the criteria they're using for unused, inactive content. putin is a cunt fucked around with this message at 13:05 on Apr 20, 2023 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:58
|
|
|
MikeJF posted:Yeah, in an ideal world what's actually going to happen is that they'll be all SELECT * WHERE DATE_LAST_REQUESTED < '01-01-2020' AND USER_ACCOUNT IS NULL This is exactly what they'll do, which will hit most of the archives.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 12:59
|
|
|
Colonel Cancer posted:Good I'm glad Not gunna lie , I'm honestly a bit conflicted, there is maybe poo poo out there I'm happy to see the end off. But it's a massive loss for like an *era* of the internet I might actually look into an image hosting site like Flickr or use a locked down Instagram for view links. Or is that just shifting the problem. Down the track? Interesting times
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:08
|
|
|
Desperately hoping for a free forever host so I can look at my old memes in 2050
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:23
|
|
|
IMGUR DEEZ NUTS
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:34
|
|
|
We've come to a decision, we will make things worse and say it's good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:35
|
|
|
im so freakin angry im going imgrrrrrrrrr rn
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:38
|
|
|
One of the names Jeff was looking at for a replacement was imgrr
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:41
|
|
|
I upload my porn pictures to imgur. Dm the link to myself on twitter so then I can access them easily as I take my phone to my bedroom if you know what I mean 
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:42
|
|
|
maybe everyone could pm seth their shrek porn and erotica so he can catalogue it and keep it in a safe space before it's all gone may 15th.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:45
|
|
Luvcow posted:maybe everyone could pm seth their shrek porn and erotica so he can catalogue it and keep it in a safe space before it's all gone may 15th.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:59
|
|
|
Is the internet archive saying anything on this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 13:59
|
|
|
When it said "your upload will resume after this ad", did anyone ever actually see an ad? For me, it just continued loading with a mostly blank screen, then showed me my uploaded image. Maybe if they got ads to work, they'd have enough money to keep their archives robust.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:13
|
|
|
The meme thread...... Have they not thought about what this will do to our image meme thread??
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:27
|
|
|
Beartaco posted:But it was posted on twitter, so it must be true. You could, you know, read the linked new TOS talk that Imgur put up themselves.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:34
|
|
|
Gasmask posted:if they were smart like me they would instead rationalise their storage by having just one photo of goatse, one image of nude shrek, one pair of tits. they could instantly deduplicate their whole database and reduce their expenses. This is rear end pic erasure and I will not stand for it 
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:38
|
|
|
Well this is dumb, what the gently caress?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 14:49 |
|
|
gently caress. This is gonna hurt AI a bunch. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2023 14:59
|
|
