|
I AM INVEENCEBLE
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 19:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 19:34 |
|
|
It’s either Hal, TMor, or Tokes
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 20:13
|
|
|
loving rad
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:24
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:It’s either Hal, TMor, or Tokes Why not grand?
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:25
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:It’s either Hal, TMor, or Tokes Also as much as I want to vote Hal just on general principle I’m not sure I feel like voting the other vote leader on a day 1 scum execution.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:27
|
|
|
Voodoofly posted:Also as much as I want to vote Hal just on general principle I’m not sure I feel like voting the other vote leader on a day 1 scum execution. Yeah but MQ specifically came in going “hey cool who are we gonna turbo?” When Hal was at -2 already. Absolutely strikes me as scum behavior wanting to post but not just drop a vote on their scumbud
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:28
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Yeah but MQ specifically came in going “hey cool who are we gonna turbo?” When Hal was at -2 already. Absolutely strikes me as scum behavior wanting to post but not just drop a vote on their scumbud Maybe. This is a decent point.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:29
|
|
|
Ok yeah reading MQs posts I’m back to Hal being fair game.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 21:31
|
|
|
That’s dumb I wouldn’t have been an early vote on my scumbro when there was a strong chance I was going to be the other option I don’t think it’s grandi at all, no idea why Sandwolf wouldn’t suspect voodoo at all but would suspect me
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:14
|
|
|
Hal Insandenza posted:That’s dumb I wouldn’t have been an early vote on my scumbro when there was a strong chance I was going to be the other option Hal… not one chunk of this makes sense. Why would you not commit to the bus if it were scum v scum D1? Why would I suspect voodoo? Did MQ even mention them? What?
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:15
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Hal… not one chunk of this makes sense. Why would you not commit to the bus if it were scum v scum D1? Why would I suspect voodoo? Did MQ even mention them? What? I would never ever bus my only scum buddy D1 in a game with this crew. The odds of me making it to the end alone are almost 0. And MQ not mentioning voodoo is not any sort of point in his favor
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:19
|
|
|
Hal Insandenza posted:I would never ever bus my only scum buddy D1 in a game with this crew. The odds of me making it to the end alone are almost 0. Nah, ##vote Hal
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:33
|
|
|
Getting slightly scummy vibes from Hal's defensiveness, but I dunno Tmor's silence is suspicious but his post makes me think he genuinely didn't see the hammer in time (thats what happened to me in race 2)
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:41
|
|
|
I'd be more inclined to Tokes or Grandicap for going after Hal than Hal himself tbh, but not confident wanna see more posts
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:43
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Nah, well you are going to look dumb later
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:55
|
|
|
I actually don't really think it is voodoo at the moment, TMor or tokes IMO
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 22:56
|
|
|
Then why even go through the earlier effort to throw shade on Voodoo while not mentioning tokes or TM
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 23:04
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Then why even go through the earlier effort to throw shade on Voodoo while not mentioning tokes or TM I was out walking the dog and saw the two of you talking about me and I reacted while still in a tizzy over the incredible slander that was happening and maybe it wasn’t totally well thought out Also I thought voodoo was voting me and not MQ on D1, he was just casually shading me instead but hey who wasn’t right
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 23:08
|
|
|
The day I’m not casually sharing Hal is going to be a sad day indeed. I don’t know though I don’t think I want to vote Hal today. ##vote tokes because I’ve missed you dearly and I’m sorry you were scum this game
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 23:21
|
|
|
Shading. But I like to casually share Hal too
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2023 23:21
|
|
|
Voodoofly posted:Shading. But I like to casually share Hal too 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 00:24
|
|
|
There’s plenty of Hal for everyone
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 00:51
|
|
|
I might be making a big mistake here,, but I think its just academic at this point. Im the doctor which means that there's a cop. So I think with the roleblocker out we can just process of elimination this to victory 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:04
|
|
|
Cop if you are out there sit on your investigations for another day
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:13
|
|
|
Unless you caught scum ofc but I presume you’d have spoken up by now, town reads will be valuable closer to lylo, easier to pen in the last scum
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:13
|
|
|
Token Female posted:I might be making a big mistake here,, but I think its just academic at this point. Im the doctor which means that there's a cop. So I think with the roleblocker out we can just process of elimination this to victory Also who’s scum
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:14
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Also who’s scum I'm leading hal or tired mostly based on the vote. I'll have time tomorrow morning to actually post something coherent
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:33
|
|
|
Token Female posted:I'm leading hal or tired mostly based on the vote. I'll have time tomorrow morning to actually post something coherent I would definitely like to see how it would be me based on the vote but I’ll wait until tomorrow morning I guess
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:34
|
|
|
oh of course when mq is scum, i was afk anyway, i have a feeling scum knew mq was gonna get turbo'd in game 3 anyway.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 01:35
|
|
|
Token Female posted:I might be making a big mistake here,, but I think its just academic at this point. Im the doctor which means that there's a cop. So I think with the roleblocker out we can just process of elimination this to victory Theres a setup that has a doctor and no cop, so we can't know that for sure. My gut is really torn on Hal, I just don't think he's scum and SOMEONE who is scum is going after him but I don't know who yet
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 04:13
|
|
|
JosefStalinator posted:Theres a setup that has a doctor and no cop, so we can't know that for sure. The scum had a role blocker though so that means if there is a doc then there is a cop
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 04:20
|
|
|
Hal Insandenza posted:The scum had a role blocker though so that means if there is a doc then there is a cop I'm dumb and definitely misread or skimmed Wins' post, thank you!
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 04:40
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 06:51
|
|
|
Also this is more just theorycrafting but if we have a doctor and a cop and roleblocker is dead would it at least make some sense to have cop claim now? We will get a minimum of two clears and possibly a scum hit. If cop doesn’t claim then tokes is just guessing as to who to protect tonight.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 06:57
|
|
|
I think if cop did not investigate tokes then it might be solvable right now? Sand Hal Grand Voodoo Tokes Stalin Tmor Let’s just use names as placeholders for a theory Voodoo cop Voodoo has grand as town night 1 Execute Hal town Tokes dies n2 Voodoo has sand as town night 2 Execute tmor Voodoo dies night 3 Day 4 would be: Grand cleared town Sand cleared town Stalin scum
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 07:04
|
|
|
What if cop checked the person that's dead XD
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 07:13
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:What if cop checked the person that's dead XD Yes that could happen too I said it’s theorycrafting.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 07:15
|
|
|
Voodoofly posted:I think if cop did not investigate tokes then it might be solvable right now? Even though this is just placeholder names, I want it all to be exactly how the game plays out.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 12:43
|
|
|
With a flipped scumblocker the setup could be either 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies. 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Townies. So Tokes could be on the up and up and there is a cop and this game is solvable, or there is not a cop and Tokes is the last scum. But if it is a gambit, then we will know by the final 3. Because there won't be a cop flip or a doc flip, and the cop if they exist would claim there if they hadn't already. So if it is a gambit it falls apart before scum victory, it will just draw it out. Assuming that the cop exists, and they have a clean investigation (not Tokes or a dead person), they need 1 more clean investigation before claiming to guarantee a town win. Or just nail scum, that works too. If we only need 1 more clean investigation, it might make sense for cop to claim today, so that they draw the Token doc (Token dies tonight like in Voodoo's vision), get their second clean investigation, then we ride those 3 cleared town to endgame (2 investigations + the cop)
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 12:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 19:34 |
|
|
Yeah I almost claimed even before tokes did, but I am the cop with a town investigation on grandi so it's from the pool of voodoo, sandwolf, TMor or Stalin
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2023 13:19
|
|