Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe

Ciaphas posted:

whyyyy did i use std::pair instead of making a god damned struct with a constructor so the compiler would error or at least warn on this poo poo



:cripes:

yeah c++’s love of default initialization is a huge design mistake. it gets overlooked when people talk about default init because u.b. is an even more glaring problem but that’s fixable whereas the language not forcing you to use meaningful values is not

a simplified version of this (just with a local variable) was in my c++now talk a few weeks ago. i’ll steal this aggregate thing though for the next time i need to talk about it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply