- OneEightHundred
- Feb 28, 2008
-
Soon, we will be unstoppable!
|
Historical reasons, slavery mainly. The slave states feared a popularly elected president because the votes of free blacks in the North would count, while the massive Southern slave populations would not. By apportioning electoral votes to the states they could inflate the Southern
vote by (as it turned out) 3/5ths of the number of slaves.
It has persisted because the constitution was deliberately made quite difficult to change, and states that benefit from the EC system have their influence over constitutional amendments increased as well, also it almost never matters so people against the system don't have much motivation for the fight.
Electors were also envisioned to be independent representatives, which is the whole reason they are in the process in the first place instead of just voting for president. Party slates, pledged electors, and winner-take-all system are all completely against the original vision.
(The winner-take-all system is basically there because states want to maximize their own importance. They think it's better that whoever wins the majority in their state gets the maximum advantage possible toward being the president.)
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2024 04:46
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2024 14:58
|
|