Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OneEightHundred
Feb 28, 2008

Soon, we will be unstoppable!

VitalSigns posted:

Historical reasons, slavery mainly. The slave states feared a popularly elected president because the votes of free blacks in the North would count, while the massive Southern slave populations would not. By apportioning electoral votes to the states they could inflate the Southern
vote by (as it turned out) 3/5ths of the number of slaves.

It has persisted because the constitution was deliberately made quite difficult to change, and states that benefit from the EC system have their influence over constitutional amendments increased as well, also it almost never matters so people against the system don't have much motivation for the fight.
Electors were also envisioned to be independent representatives, which is the whole reason they are in the process in the first place instead of just voting for president. Party slates, pledged electors, and winner-take-all system are all completely against the original vision.

(The winner-take-all system is basically there because states want to maximize their own importance. They think it's better that whoever wins the majority in their state gets the maximum advantage possible toward being the president.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply