|
My one big piece of feedback is that I wish there was more of a rule against arguments defending, either implicitly or explicitly, violence against civilians and/or that the punishment for it was something more extreme than the typical d&d 'made a snarky reply' or 'failed to address the argument' 6/12/24
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2023 00:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 15:32 |
|
|
cspam should be allowed to quote d&d posts cuz it's like the big piles of rotting trash bags on the sidewalk in nyc which are an important part of the vibe (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2023 05:46
|
|
|
basically koos while i get why it is important to have a bit of flexibility in the rules to let people make a bit of an argument about whatever it is also equally important that the people pushing well past that already permissive line get blasted from the sniper tower. if instead the idea is to have relatively hands off moderation and mostly only use 24hr max probes, you need to restrict the bounds of what is appropriate to argue.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2023 20:57
|
|