|
I can’t see New England doing that even if Kraft does seem sympathetic to Mac
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2024 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
Drake Mayer would be a better name
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2024 01:23
|
|
|
People overate the rookie deal stuff. It’s good obviously but you can’t build your entire team around that idea. That only works in hindsight
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2024 11:30
|
|
|
The correct way to develop a QB is to play them a year, dump them , then move onto the next one
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2024 17:23
|
|
|
I mean saying they did not need it is a bit counter factual. Who knows if it would have helped them along
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2024 19:43
|
|
|
He was already MVP so would have another offensive piece stopped him from choking? Probably not
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 19:25
|
|
|
They failed against the Bucs because the Bucs pass rush lived in the backfield. A WR wasn’t gonna change that
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 20:36
|
|
|
If you have a conclusion and are trying to build an argument around that conclusion sure
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 20:38
|
|
|
Well yes and that argument is silly. He was the MVP of the league and had one of the best seasons of his career. If you think a rookie is what’s going to make it then I don’t know what to tell you Not to mention the fact the fact the current young WR core aren’t even first rounders. So it’s not like it’s take a WR in the first round or bust. So what makes you think they would take a WR instead of Love?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 20:51
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:The Packers would have probably hosed it up and taken a defensive guy who they misused, but they could have taken, say, Tee Higgins instead of Love and I don’t think there’s any argument that he would have been useful in 2021 and 2022. Late career Rodgers lived to laser focus on Adams as his security blanket so probably not as much as you would think
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 21:01
|
|
|
He brought Lazard with him to the jets he absolutely did not have to throw to him. He wanted to
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 21:17
|
|
|
Though all this is academic because not having WRs was not the problem the packers had that year
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 21:46
|
|
|
Well if it’s universally acknowledged by the gods of football who am I to point out the obvious
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 22:31
|
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:What is your obvious point? That a glaring need on that team wasn’t actually glaring? That one draft pick was not, and never had a chance, to suddenly fix the Packers issues The fact people think an obviously stupid talking point is in any way true is dumb as hell This is just an excuse to cry about the live pick as if it mattered
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2024 22:52
|
|
|
Canopus250 posted:The added bonus to this is also that the packers took AJ Dillon in the 2nd that same year. A guy whose only noteworthy thing is having huge legs in camp. I feel like this only works with hindsight since we know those defensive players aren’t going to work out. If those defensive players had worked out then maybe a seasoned defense can protect the packers offense when they inevitably have bad games
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2024 00:33
|
|
|
JJ is the perfect Bears QB let’s go
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2024 22:44
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Dear god no, He can stay QB 3/4 and the Vikings or Falcons can have him. Accept your fate
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2024 22:50
|
|
|
I’m going to be the patriots GM but we are keeping it hush hush for now
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2024 00:49
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Yearly reminder that Josh Allen loving sucked rear end vs Mountain West competition in college and none of us know poo poo Yeah that coaches actually do matter for how QBs turn out
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2024 23:18
|
|
|
I like how that treats drafting a QB as if explaining it to a gambling addict
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2024 19:17
|
|
|
The lesson is nepotism doesn’t work if you are the exact opposite of the position of your kin
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2024 02:58
|
|
|
Look the point is we are trading someone
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2024 04:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
Then the player sucks and the cycle starts anew
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2024 03:18
|
|