|
Jesus the leg situation in that second pic. How can you look at that and not at least give the AI gatcha another spin?
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2024 15:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
The Seatbelt/Tie Hybrid is going to be the absolute fashion statement of 2024, just watch.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2024 21:09
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Oh yeah there's already tons of lovely AI-generated books on Amazon. Here's a blog post from a librarian who ordered a pile of kids books for their shelves and discovered one was AI nonsense: ... Man, that makes me really angry
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2024 21:05
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:thread about a set of DC Comics' Batman art probably being AI I can't read Twitter threads but lol did they seriously see Batman kissing what is obviously Marvel's Black Cat and go "yep looks legit"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2024 18:50
|
|
|
Captain Hygiene posted:That's Black Canary, a DC character who just happens to have the same physicality and costume aesthetic as Black Cat. Totally different! ... why does Black Canary have cat ears?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2024 19:02
|
|
|
Oh, I know, I'm just saying what that reads to me as is "AI got Catwoman and Black Cat confused and nobody double checked because whatever, sexy flirty cat thief character."
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2024 19:13
|
|
|
The Sausages posted:I totally understand artists feeling betrayed by other artists using AI but I hate this witchhunting BS more than I hate crappy AI art. "I've kept refining the AI prompt to make it look more and more like a picture and now it looks like the picture therefore the original is also AI" is some AI paranoia brainworms. The supposed resemblance is clearly not a coincidence - because it's something this dipshit is doing on purpose. Bonus points for dipshittery if they included the artist's name in the prompt. There is zero chance an actual artist draws Black Cat instead of Catwoman by mistake. I don't know about the rest but that poo poo is either AI or direct plagerism.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2024 14:44
|
|
|
I like when they clearly tried to go "See! We can do HANDS" except if you look at it at all it looks hilariously awful.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2024 21:43
|
|
|
cllickbaid
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2024 18:34
|
|
|
"Good enough" isn't the same as "Good." You can use horrible AI created images but they are going to look various degrees of crappy and off to anyone who is doing more than glancing at them. Like we're still not even at the point where hand-crafted CGI can be comfortably mistaken for reality in most situations, AI isn't going to do that better.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2024 21:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:I am not advocating for the goodness of AI, just remarking on its capabilities. I deeply hate it and it's poisoning the well for creative jobs and creativity in general. Are you trying to claim that was done in a single go or even a few dozen gos?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 28, 2024 01:46
|
|