|
Doctor J Off posted:I read his book Artemis for the 372 Pages podcast and it was not good to say the least. I hope his other books are a lot better than that Loved the Martian, but Artemis was real bad most recent book - This Is How You Lose The Time War i thought it was pretty good and I liked it, although its relatively short and the twist is extremely predictable, but there's something beautifully poetic about the story. AARD VARKMAN posted:The Martian was decent competency porn and so was Project Hail Mary though the latter does stretch further in to SF. Old Man's War was good, the sequels and whatnot were 90s Waldenbook poo poo-tier
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2024 03:25 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 10:14 |
|
Captain Hygiene posted:Jurassic Park's been on my mind since it got mentioned upthread, and I finally jumped in to give it re-read for the first time in probably 15 years. Man it holds up so far, I'm standing by my thought that it's my favorite premise for its general thriller genre, and it seems like it's paying that off so far. I somehow read the book before seeing the movie, and ofc the math and poo poo went way over my head, but the book is its own interesting story that has very little to do with the movie.
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2024 03:14 |
|
kiminewt posted:I read that trilogy as a teen but was weirded out by the dirt-eating sex cult thing they had going on. Wonder if it'll go down more smoothly as an adult. that book starts out but it fades out pretty quickly hella want an airship tho
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2024 17:34 |
|
I binged Charles Stross Accelerando yesterday. I thought it was interesting, a tiny bit prescient for being written 1999-2004, but also mostly that science fiction really doesn't need sex scenes
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2024 04:18 |