|
The X-man cometh posted:Did they kill the bubble boy? the Moops did.
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 18:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
The X-man cometh posted:Did they kill the bubble boy? He appears in the finale, testifying in court against both Jerry (for not coming to his house as he'd promised and sending George instead) and of course George. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbzjaecJZQM Edit: Somewhat unrelated, but I just remembered how in one episode, George tried to arrange a date with a hot lady singer who liked quirky bald men, and when she asked him about his relationship status, he reluctantly admitted that he was engaged. She immediately punched him in the face, hard, something I'm sure almost anyone who had any dealings of note with George Costanza would also want to do. Can't stand ya! BigBadSteve fucked around with this message at 18:56 on Jan 21, 2024 |
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 18:43
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:I was considering having a wank instead Too bad you couldnt do that for a living. You'd be a big star. You'd sell out Madison Square Garden!
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 19:19
|
|
|
the elmer fudd laugher was a cutie and Jerry deserves to die alone
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 19:29
|
|
|
King of the castle king of the castle
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 19:45
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:I'll take your word for it that real-life 'good samaritan laws' in the U.S. do what you say they do, and even take your word for all the other claims you make. Ultimately, however, this is a TV series, the stories and many concepts in it are fictional. I'm guessing anyway that the term 'good samaritan law' is generally not an official term, but one used unofficially to describe certain type(s) of law. The term would probably used in media reports and in discussion by the politicians who passed those laws, but I'm guesstimating the term is never used in text of the actual legislation concerned. As an unofficial term, its use could easily change if the type of legislation we're talking about was passed (English is a living language, even American English.) I'm not sure what could have given the impression that I was attempting to raise an objection about the contents of the show itself; I only meant to offer an answer to the topic at hand that I find (as I said) interesting. If you doubt the veracity of my speaking from general knowledge, that's fine. Laudable, in fact! As you rightly point out, how can I know what was illegal in accordance with every related state law at the time of the episode's production? How can I know how the laws have changed? And, perhaps the most difficult barrier: how can I know how the law in the fiction of the show differs from real world laws? Yet the very topic of the thread is "crimes against decency" committed by the characters in Seinfeld which were not actually illegal. So I must ask in turn: How can I know what was illegal in accordance with every related state law at the time of an episodes' production? How can I know how the law in the fiction of the show differs from real life laws? How can I know how the laws have changed? And I must answer: I can't! But I did see Devin J. Stone, Esq. (whom I've independently verified to my own satisfaction to actually be a practicing attorney in the Washington D.C. area and an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law) talk about it in a YouTube video a few years ago. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 21:52
|
|
|
I thought it was pretty hosed up the time they were stuck in the history museum overnight and they had to eat all the ancient Egyptian mummies to survive. Actually I'm pretty sure all my memory of actual Seinfeld plots have been replaced with ChatGPT bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 22:16
|
|
|
Pretty sure George would be a registered sex offender by now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 22:17
|
|
|
The X-man cometh posted:Did they kill the bubble boy? nah he pulled through
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 23:29
|
|
|
Cartwright!
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 23:48
|
|
|
I liked it when they ran over that lady's dog and had to burn the dog but it didn't burn properly so they had to put the burned bits in a bag and the lady noticed so they pretended it was barbecue and ate some of the burned dog.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2024 23:53
|
|
|
Seinfeld? How old do you think I am?
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 00:02
|
|
|
The Loin King posted:Too bad you couldnt do that for a living. You'd be a big star. You'd sell out Madison Square Garden! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 11:00
|
|
|
Cubone posted:Ah, but my friend, do you see what you've done? You've outlined an expectation of legal knowledge that can't be met by any response to your initial query! Sorry, I lack the time to explore these issues further at this time. And mainly, we've both got rather too serous IMO for posts on a comedy subforum. And I don't live in the U.S., so have limited interest in laws there. And when I see a crime involving a victim, I ring police and report it. Regards to Mr Stone. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 13:44
|
|
|
XYZAB posted:Seinfeld? How old do you think I am? Don't worry, if you're over 18 I think you'll be safe from him. If you meant the show, isn't it still being repeated on free TV in your area, like it is where I am (and has almost never stopped)?
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 13:46
|
|
|
Bonzo posted:Pretty sure George would be a registered sex offender by now. arguable, yes. Maybe Kramer too, with his animal magnetism he attracted innumerable women, and being so eccentric/half crazy, who knows what he was capable of when the cameras were off...We will not speak of Jerry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 13:49
|
|
|
Jose Oquendo posted:the Moops did. THERE'S NO MOOPS!
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2024 22:04
|
|
|
the biggest crime in the series was someone naming their daughter Mulva
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 00:23
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:Don't worry, if you're over 18 I think you'll be safe from him. If you meant the show, isn't it still being repeated on free TV in your area, like it is where I am (and has almost never stopped)? Watchseinfeld.net is as good white noise as any
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 00:37
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:I was considering having a wank instead, but decided instead to multitask cleaning & fixing & ordering & organizing a few things at home and also post this here thread about an unrelated topic, i.e. not on the subject of wanking so hopefully won't get me probed (heheh, 'probed') or the thread gassed. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 14:37
|
|
|
he freakin loves jacking off to weird stuff
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 14:40
|
|
|
bradzilla posted:he freakin loves jacking off to weird stuff Who among us
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 15:20
|
|
|
Smugworth posted:Who among us 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 15:21
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 15:25
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:I was considering having a wank instead, but decided instead to multitask cleaning & fixing & ordering & organizing a few things at home and also post this here thread about an unrelated topic, i.e. not on the subject of wanking so hopefully won't get me probed (heheh, 'probed') or the thread gassed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 15:28
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:unless you're a high end lawyer (and if so, why would you be posting here at 3PM on a Sunday?) its called Due Dilligence op
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 16:03
|
|
|
How ironic that the very OP of the crimes against decency thread is banned for crimes against decency.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 16:26
|
|
|
Funky See Funky Do posted:How ironic that the very OP of the crimes against decency thread is banned for crimes against decency. its poetic justice actually
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 16:27
|
|
|
Funky See Funky Do posted:How ironic that the very OP of the crimes against decency thread is banned for crimes against decency. Sounds like he's read one too many Billy Mumphrey stories.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 16:44
|
|
|
3O probed for telling the trump thread he nuts, steve probed for telling the seinfeld thread he doesn’t nut seems you just can’t win around here
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:25
|
|
|
Hope he burns in hell!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:27
|
|
|
anyone else who can't help but wonder if the shadowy fyad contingent (cabal??) has determined it's time for bigbadsteve to wave "bye bye" to his account?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:29
|
|
|
Bad Purchase posted:anyone else who can't help but wonder if the shadowy fyad contingent (cabal??) has determined it's time for bigbadsteve to wave "bye bye" to his account? theyve been plotting his demise for months since that around the forums in 80 days thread. steve haplessly wandered into qcs (where the fyaders have stacked their own) and it seems they recruited seb as a patsy to do their bidding. he fell because he spoke the truth
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:33
|
|
|
Uh the main problem is the frickin Character Evidence Rule. The prosecution isn't allowed to raise evidence about the defendants' characters unless the defence raised the character issue first. Jackie Chiles should have objected to every one of those witnesses and the final episode shouldn't have happened. I guess that's what happens when you hire a civil litigator from New York to handle your criminal defence in Massachusetts? It's too bad becuase a lot of the show is really good and I think it would be remembered fondly if they had gotten some of that stuff right.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:43
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1MBVXkQbWU
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:57
|
|
|
Larry Cum Free posted:Uh the main problem is the frickin Character Evidence Rule. The prosecution isn't allowed to raise evidence about the defendants' characters unless the defence raised the character issue first. Jackie Chiles should have objected to every one of those witnesses and the final episode shouldn't have happened. I guess that's what happens when you hire a civil litigator from New York to handle your criminal defence in Massachusetts? Massachusetts sitcom caselaw says that the prosecution was allowed to raise that evidence due to the inherent depraved indifference of their charges
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 17:58
|
|
|
hot cocoa on the couch posted:theyve been plotting his demise for months since that around the forums in 80 days thread. steve haplessly wandered into qcs (where the fyaders have stacked their own) and it seems they recruited seb as a patsy to do their bidding. he fell because he spoke the truth Steve was simply the victim of a huge misunderstanding. You see, whilst not wanking he was eating some salty pretzels, and well, the pretzels were making him thirsty.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2024 21:11
|
|
|
Just caught a rerun of the JIMMY episode, and the conversation Elaine and Jerry have about him potentially being sexually assaulted by his weird dentist (he WAS tucked) is completely cracked. Imagine trying to slip "So you were violated by two people while under the gas, it happens." by as a joke now LOL.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2024 09:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 04:14 |
|
|
In a summer YouTube hole once watching a lot of behind the scenes about Curb/Seinfeld and Jerry talking about how he had final say on a plot line, more often than not. Then someone on the forums brought up his like teenage girlfriend with the big pair, and I was reminded how many episodes revolve around boobs. Jerry’s definitely a boob freak and the writers knew it. Did they even have an episode about butts other than Fusilli Jerry ?
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2024 11:01
|
|
