|
CellBlock posted:Bunch of new documents popping up on Court Listener today, notably, a response from Vince requesting the case be moved to arbitration citing the NDA he and Janel Grant signed, with a copy of the agreement attached. Maybe the biggest sign of how bad Vince's case is.
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 21:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
What is the world coming to if we cant resolve decades of sex trafficking with a simple NDA and arbitration?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 21:57
|
|
|
So what's the over/under on how long it'll take WWE to send out Andrade to tell a horror story about Tony stealing the last ham sandwich in catering one week? Because that's what tends to happen with this sort of news.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 22:03
|
|
|
TinTower posted:So what's the over/under on how long it'll take WWE to send out Andrade to tell a horror story about Tony stealing the last ham sandwich in catering one week? Because that's what tends to happen with this sort of news. Waiting for another CM Punk interview
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 22:28
|
|
|
Look, if I chose to work for Vince again despite a decade of allegations and me complaining about him, you can only imagine what Tony Khan is like
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 22:30
|
|
|
MassRafTer posted:Maybe the biggest sign of how bad Vince's case is. Yeah, and I don't think given he stopped paying and the nature of the NDA being signed under duress.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 23:21
|
|
|
Majinfoose posted:Waiting for another CM Punk interview Theyre gonna use computers to make Eddie guerreros ghost say that AEW is what actually killed Eddie
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 23:28
|
|
|
When Orton said Eddies down there he meant Jacksonville.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 23:39
|
|
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:When Orton said Eddies down there he meant Jacksonville.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2024 23:55
|
|
|
MassRafTer posted:Maybe the biggest sign of how bad Vince's case is. https://twitter.com/BabyfacevHeel/status/1782941382321070585
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 02:30
|
|
|
Wasn't the whole reason the lawsuit happened because Vince stopped paying the hush money? So how can he argue that she violated the NDA by not doing arbitration that he'd already violated by not paying?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 02:48
|
|
|
You see contracts are something other people have to follow but for Vince it's only if he feels like it. See Bret Hart
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 02:50
|
|
|
Drakkel posted:Wasn't the whole reason the lawsuit happened because Vince stopped paying the hush money? So how can he argue that she violated the NDA by not doing arbitration that he'd already violated by not paying?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 04:26
|
|
|
Also, I'm not a lawyer, but there's also (I think) a decent argument that if the conduct in Ms. Grant's complaint happened, an NDA to not disclose it is an unconscionable contract. (And if so, maybe she wouldn't get to keep the million dollars she got up front, but that presumably would be factored against any damages she would win which would presumably be much more.) I'm not sure if that's part of the case or not. (I don't recall if Grant's complaint includes anything about the NDA possibly being unenforceable at all, or just that Vince breached it by failing to pay.)
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 16:43
|
|
|
MassRafTer posted:Maybe the biggest sign of how bad Vince's case is. Actually, while Vince's case is very bad, that's probably not the correct inference to draw from this particular motion. I am a lawyer, and I have had to deal with AAA, the arbitrator of choice in the NDA, and basically, given the nature of this suit, Vince's attorneys have every reason to want to get this case to arbitration for a variety of reasons, but the most pressing, and prosaic, is that once it goes to arbitration, any further motions or pleadings will no longer go on the public docket for people on the internet to scroll through at their leisure. Given the nature of the case, even if Vince were innocent, which he is not, his lawyers would want to get it the hell away from the public as much as possible, and arbitration is how you do that. It's also a motion that Grant's lawyers are going to have to spend time and money dealing with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 20:00
|
|
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:Actually, while Vince's case is very bad, that's probably not the correct inference to draw from this particular motion. Also, Vince's lawyers have an obligation to explore every avenue possible in their client's defense. To not try and use such an avenue, unless directed by their client not to do so, would be a dereliction of their duty.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 21:03
|
|
|
CellBlock posted:Also, I'm not a lawyer, but there's also (I think) a decent argument that if the conduct in Ms. Grant's complaint happened, an NDA to not disclose it is an unconscionable contract. (And if so, maybe she wouldn't get to keep the million dollars she got up front, but that presumably would be factored against any damages she would win which would presumably be much more.) Grant's argument is that the NDA is no longer effective because Vince stopped paying, and also that it was never enforceable to begin with because both arbitration clauses and non-disclosure agreements in relation to sexual misconduct are now illegal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 23:22
|
|
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:I am a lawyer... So much for presumption of innocence. Edit: To clarify, I do think Vince is a piece of poo poo. I just think this is funny coming from a lawyer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 17:52
|
|
|
Astro7x posted:So much for presumption of innocence. Lawyers are allowed to have opinions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 18:22
|
|
|
Shine posted:Lawyers are allowed to have opinions. weak
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 18:41
|
|
|
Astro7x posted:So much for presumption of innocence. Actually, there is no presumption of innocence, it's a civil matter. As far as lawyers having opinions on whether someone is guilty or not, if lawyers weren't allowed to give that sort of opinion on a case, then 75% of the content of cable news would cease to exist. Oh. Point taken. As far as the actual litigation goes, there's a new filing. It's not really much of anything, though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 19:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/iamjohnpollock/status/1783964699408613769
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 22:35
|
|
|
I'm not a lawyer, but I believe that Vince McMahon and his family should be Romanov'd even before we get to the multiple rapes he committed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 22:45
|
|
|
Gonzo McFee posted:I'm not a lawyer, but I believe that Vince McMahon and his family should be Romanov'd even before we get to the multiple rapes he committed. fierce
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 22:49
|
|
|
Literally A Person posted:fierce your rap sheet is insane, and you seem to only be in this subforum to poo poo up our most serious thread. What the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:10
|
|
|
Shard posted:your rap sheet is insane, and you seem to only be in this subforum to poo poo up our most serious thread. What the gently caress Def need banned
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:25
|
|
|
shaddup!!!! dont post about posters here
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1783985369630806449 Time for a runner, says lovely Khan
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:32
|
|
|
OMG I seriously hope he's resigning because he knows that this lawsuit will affect him too
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:36
|
|
|
Gonzo McFee posted:https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1783985369630806449 What does this mean?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:36
|
|
|
a dumb moron posted:What does this mean? 👀👀👀🤯🤯🤯 (but really, what DOES it mean?)
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:40
|
|
|
Who is scooping up all these shares? The Rock?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:40
|
|
|
How much money does the Rock drat have?? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:41
|
|
|
While I hope it's Khan getting out cause he knows heat is gonna be coming down on him for the lawsuit it could be because the rumors of Endeavor being made private are around and that could apply to TKO too
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:42
|
|
|
a dumb moron posted:What does this mean? If he really sells that means he is out of WWE but he probably isn't quote:Also listed as a seller is WWE president Nick Khan, who also has filed to sell what appear to be all his holdings of 234,424 shares, an amount that includes restricted stock units which the executive has amassed. Khan listed the same 234,424 shares for sale in the same September prospectus and to date has not sold any WWE stock; he also remains in his position at the company.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:44
|
|
|
Hes selling to Vince
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2024 23:50
|
|
|
a WWE crowd silent and confused when the piano of the Miramax intro theme begins, but then losing their mind when the HARVEY WEINSTEIN wordmark appears on the enormous video board
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2024 14:20
|
|
|
AsInHowe posted:a WWE crowd silent and confused when the piano of the Miramax intro theme begins, but then losing their mind when the HARVEY WEINSTEIN wordmark appears on the enormous video board
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2024 14:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
That's sounds like a great edit for the, "Come out you rapist!" video
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2024 15:33
|
|
