|
Schultz off the board https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1765077130109751347
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2024 19:15 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 22:33 |
|
quote:The Panthers will clear only $52,000 in cap space by cutting Hurst before March 16, with $9.9 million in dead money. Lol
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2024 19:27 |
|
That Madubuike contract is waaaay more than I would feel comfortable giving him after an outlier year on a loaded defense. If I'm Christian Wilkins and I actually have multiple years of production at that level under my belt, I'm asking for like $30m (and if I'm Chris Jones I guess I'm asking for Danny Dimes money?)
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2024 00:52 |
|
He doesn't have multiple years of double-digit sacks, but I would say being a solid interior pass rusher and one of the best interior run stoppers in the league puts him on a similar level as 2023 MadubuikeBorsche69 posted:'way' more is a little bit of a stretch. if he had two years of that kind of production, then this would be a massive underpay. he was pretty good in 2022 and fantastic in 2023. with that + the cap explosion, going for slightly more than the second highest contract feels about right. he's trending in the right direction and there's a decent chance it looks like a good value within a year or two. Yeah I guess I would have thought a "solid deal" would be locking him in at like $3m less AAV, but I'm just surprised they had to pay him top-of-the-non-Donald market money and guarantee 75% of the contract. I guess there's a chance it was worth paying what they had to now and waiting until after the Jones/Wilkins deals would have only driven the price up more, though It's also hard to judge because I look at the DT contracts on the books now and my first instinct is to go "drat, they paid him $2m a year more than Dexter Lawrence and gave him $15m more guaranteed??", but at the same time I could go "They paid him $2m a year more than Daron Payne...I guess that's fine." The one thing I'm certain of is that Lawrence contract is going to age like fine wine
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2024 01:36 |
|
What would Bosa even get paid if he hit the open market right now? Dude's still got some juice when healthy but there's just no way you can expect to have him for a full season at this point
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2024 21:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1766931372042502228 Baker is BACK edit: https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1766931533300932843 Seems like a good deal for Tampa, both on the guarantee and AAV? xbilkis fucked around with this message at 22:02 on Mar 10, 2024 |
# ¿ Mar 10, 2024 21:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1767031634728034531 Cursed images
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 04:38 |
|
That's only a tick higher on the AAV than I expected for Greenard. Could be a solid deal if he's as good as the ~metrics~ make him out to be
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 17:46 |
|
https://twitter.com/jjones9/status/1767236741407109283 Titans slowly assembling a real line
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 18:17 |
|
That's so much money for a team that is going to do jack poo poo over the life of that contract
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 18:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1767250441337741463 C'mon man don't let the Eagles have him for that much edit: $34m guaranteed, what are other teams doing
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 19:07 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:AFCEast Exodus continues This seems super cheap for a guy coming off a real good year
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 19:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1767287357097623657 Good price on Stone given the safety deals so far
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 21:40 |
|
The Panthers need to build an entire offense so they know if their #1 QB is a bust or if he just sucked because every player around him sucked. But also a few of their best defenders were hitting free agency now and they didn't have a ton of cap space despite having 0 foundational pieces under long-term contract. So they end up letting dudes like Burns and Luvu go so they can sign a guard for $20 million and overpay someone like Calvin Ridley and recoup some of their lost draft capital
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 22:36 |
|
https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1767346864561525140 Doesn't seem bad considering where the market is heading
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2024 01:28 |
|
https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1767380882417930295 Carolina paying their guards $33m a season and I still can't definitely say they're going to be good (the guards, not the team itself)
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2024 03:50 |
|
https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1767679137244733846 Big one
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2024 23:29 |
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1767679353465249846 That's actually a super reasonable deal given his age. Full guarantee doesn't really hurt when it's only two years
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2024 23:30 |
|
Rapoport said Hunter had teams willing to pay him above $25m/year but he took a hometown discount, which makes that contract make more sense
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 00:01 |
|
Mystic Stylez posted:https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1767715723718402185?t=kHd9Pojgt6eBRd3almSAww&s=19 His most memorable play in Chicago was declining to take an easy path out of bounds on a potential game-tying drive and immediately having the ball ripped out of his hands to end it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fara5f6N_LI Then he returned a punt for a TD against us with Carolina. Generally not a good-for-the-Bears guy, can't comment beyond that
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 02:13 |
|
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1767981888524767264 No Mack hitting the market
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 19:33 |
|
This isn't really accurate; Jordan Schultz just said in some video yesterday that he'd be "surprised but not shocked" if he went back to Jacksonville. I can't figure out exactly when it published, but it looks like it predates a lot of the smoke about him likely re-signing with the Jags. Still interesting that at least one guy heard it's not a lock pretty recently
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 19:43 |
|
Not if they do it after 4 p.m. eastern today. That's why people have been speculating he's just holding out for the new league year to re-sign
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 19:53 |
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1768021822874796389 Whoa
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2024 22:11 |
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:What an awful loving trade for Seattle. They very much still have a 3rd round pick
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2024 22:57 |
|
Let's gooo
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2024 03:20 |
|
I would say they're definitely going to take a WR at 5 now but I don't want to underestimate Jim Harbaugh's hatred of the forward pass
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2024 03:48 |
|
You're going to have to narrow it down, on account of all the clowns in the entertainment industry. (Just joking around — much respect to all celebs. - x)
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2024 04:57 |
|
Wasn't Bosa a San Diego Charger
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2024 07:53 |
|
^edit: she's a legit source for Panthers news; she's broken a couple of signings this weekSirPablo posted:How is this guy? The Bears played three awful centers last year and Feeney was the worst one / only got used as a last resort, so not great
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2024 03:03 |
|
Yeah the Burns move was fine in a vacuum; he's not a $30m AAV guy. The problem is that they had better opportunities to trade him in the past and didn't pull the trigger, but that was a different regime so you can't really hold that against them now
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2024 18:10 |
|
I don't think Young and Clowney are particularly similar at all. Young had a good rookie year, then took a step back before blowing up his knee. Post-injury, he's looked like a pretty good pass rush specialist who has basically no discipline when he's got scheme responsibilities that go beyond "get to quarterback." There's some usefulness in that, but it is the kind of thing that gets you a bunch of mercenary one-year contracts from teams that think "We need to get to the quarterback more!" but eventually get annoyed by 17 games of a guy consistently being in the wrong place edit: And yeah, it's concerning that he got to a contender with a loaded D-line and his production/discipline/focus did not improve
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2024 22:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 22:33 |
|
I think it's underdiscussed how Minnesota might be pretty badly situated to move up, even though they're sitting just outside the top 10. Any team in that 4-6 stretch wouldn't just be giving up on their preferred prospect by moving down to 11; there's a good chance they'd be giving up on the entire "blue chip" tier of prospect in this draft. I feel like most teams would have no more than 8-9 guys classified on that level — some combo of the top 3 QBs, top 3 WRs, maybe 1-2 LTs, maybe an EDGE or a CB, maybe Bowers. A trade down with Minnesota would be hard to swallow unless you're really high on Bowers, a defender or a non-Alt tackle. And then from Minnesota's perspective, you've got an inverse situation going on, where it's totally reasonable for them to ask "How much should I really have to pay for the right to move up 6-7 picks and draft the 4th best QB in this draft?". It's hard for me to imagine them finding common ground with another team on a fair price to trade up.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2024 06:49 |