|
ruddiger posted:Is the negative space of the ghoul thing supposed to form a letter or a number? It looks like it's supposed to but I can't figure it out. Looks like it's maybe supposed to be his lightning bolt scar, but isn't quite there.
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
Mondo's new 300 2 poster. It's interesting. I'll give it that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2014 23:00
|
|
|
It makes me hungry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2014 23:08
|
|
|
penismightier posted:Dunno yet but I am gonna watch the balls out of it. This did not live up to the cover art, as most of these flicks fail to do. The stories aren't horrific, just simple morality plays. There is absolutely no gore or decay, like the cover suggests, and the title Shock Chamber is a complete non sequitur. The original title Greedy Terror is a lot more appropriate as all stories have to do with great. Aside from the exchange I mentioned before, there's not a whole lot going for it but a good sense of sincerity in the filmmaking. But that only gets you so far. I enjoyed it, but it's no hidden treasure.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2014 23:18
|
|
|
You guys are watching Emmeritus flicks now? You poor bastards. In all honesty though, I actually like some of them, such as Body Count. http://www.canuxploitation.com/article/emmeritus.html
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 00:05
|
|
|
MachineryNoise posted:You guys are watching Emmeritus flicks now? You poor bastards. Man that site bashes them all, but it's nice to see my sentiment echo'd: quote:Greedy Terror
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 00:11
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Mondo's new 300 2 poster. Bad, even for mondo. It's detailed but it is so devoid of creativity I don't know where to begin.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 01:28
|
|
|
I'd start with that lovely miniature Xerxes and move on from there. Maybe the blood face Immortal mask could've done without the boat and Xerxes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 01:40
|
|
|
300: Rise of the BBQ Pulled Pork
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 01:40
|
|
|
The mini-Xerxes makes me think it's a Mighty Max playset:
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 02:34
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Mondo's new 300 2 poster. This is giving me Princess Mononoke flashbacks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
I don't usually poo poo on Mondo but it reminds me of ground beef. And probably should have been gold/brown with red accents to fit in with the movie's palette a little better, unless there's a variant, I suppose. Maybe it'd look cooler/less like meat if it were done in bloody-looking watercolors. I'd like to see that, actually.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 04:17
|
|
|
muike posted:There is an actual human being named Imogen Poots Her name is Imogen Gay Poots.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
P.S. I'll find my poots Who took my poots Who found my poots
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 05:28
|
|
|
Poots was also in the recent (and excellent) Filth but didn't get to do all that much. E: On that note:  loving hash tags. Stare-Out fucked around with this message at 12:45 on Jan 25, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 12:43
|
|
|
#filth is a one-word description of Twitter if I ever saw one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 14:56
|
|
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Speaking of which, I always thought that had a neat poster: It's also a really, really good movie. A friend of mine says it's the most disturbing movie he's ever watched - OK, he's a Christian, but the voyeuristic aspect of it just freaked him out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 16:05
|
|
|
Jedit posted:It's also a really, really good movie. A friend of mine says it's the most disturbing movie he's ever watched - OK, he's a Christian, but the voyeuristic aspect of it just freaked him out. The cast they got it also really sold it. A pre-Arrested Development Will Arnett is not just the voice-over guy, but makes an appearance at the end as the producer. It's largely a cast of unknowns, with the actress who plays Dawn being the only one who had a major role in a feature film (she's Catherine Martin from Silence Of The Lambs. I remember seeing actress who played the old Catholic nurse in a commercial for aspirin or something and immediately having a reaction because of her role in this film. I kinda wish they had gone with the alternate ending where the two contestants are beaten to death trying to escape a mob angry that one of them didn't kill the other. A running theme about the show is that this largely the fault of the audience and that ending really nails that aspect. Kinda wish Daniel Minahan would do more films, but it seems that he's fairly successful on television, directing episodes of Six Feet Under, Deadwood, True Blood and Game Of Thrones.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 16:17
|
|
|
It came from Etsy.  
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 17:03
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:
So... where can I buy this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
With all of this Robocop talk, I was wondering if the 80's version ever made it clear whether Murphy's: 1. Skin was stretched over a fake robotic face underneath to simulate his human face. If so, was the skin real or fake? 2. Or his actual skull/face muscles/etc attached to his metal head? I always assumed it was #2, but looking at some of those photos of his exposed head are a little more disturbing than I remember. Also, I can't remember, are any of his bones or human body in the machine? I know that some of the Robocop 2 prototypes had human bodies in them, but the final Robocop 2 only had that dude's brain in it. I need to watch Robocop again! Edit: Sorry, just realized this should probably go in the Robocop thread. If this isn't appropriate, I'll move it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 17:16
|
|
|
He has to be fed baby food, so he still has organs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 17:18
|
|
|
Oh boy
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 17:22
|
|
|
Duckula posted:It came from Etsy. Cutout is the worst photoshop filter. The kerning in these, somehow, manages to be even more offensive than the lovely use of the shittiest filter.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 18:08
|
|
|
Violator posted:With all of this Robocop talk, I was wondering if the 80's version ever made it clear whether Murphy's: I believe it's 1. One of the few redeeming scenes from RoboCop 2 is when Murphy's wife visits him in HQ: quote:Ellen Murphy: [sees Robocop without his helmet] Alex, is it really you?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 18:15
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:Oh boy I had no idea what this was a poster for until I saw the URL. Now I know how normal people feel when they see some nerd bait poster.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 18:21
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:Oh boy Hey the space needle! (It's a metaphor)
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
effectual posted:Hey the space needle! (It's a metaphor) It's a metaphor for a stupidly tall building.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
I am really curious to see how well 50 Shades does and so should all nerds because this may be the beginning of another rated R renaissance.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 19:14
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I am really curious to see how well 50 Shades does and so should all nerds because this may be the beginning of another rated R renaissance. There's a rumor that they will release both an R-rated and NC-17 version.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 19:48
|
|
|
Doesn't make a lot of sense to do that, it would make more sense to go R, then an unrated version or whatever when it comes to home video.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 19:53
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I am really curious to see how well 50 Shades does and so should all nerds because this may be the beginning of another rated R renaissance. I'm ecstatic for it for all sorts of reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
Same. I'm really curious to see how explicit it is because I miss uncomfortably steamy erotic dramas.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Same. I'm really curious to see how explicit it is because I miss uncomfortably steamy erotic dramas. Isn't most of the novel about her being kidnapped or some poo poo? They will probably only have time for some light spanking in the run time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:Oh boy I do like they went with a no namer. Jamie Dornan is nobody on any radar so it could make or break his career.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:I do like they went with a no namer. Jamie Dornan is nobody on any radar so it could make or break his career. Is there really any debate? It will destroy any of his future prospects. Maybe he will get a few roles from it, but by the time the trilogy has finished he'll be on a downward trend that ends in TV acting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:10
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:Is there really any debate? It will destroy any of his future prospects. Maybe he will get a few roles from it, but by the time the trilogy has finished he'll be on a downward trend that ends in TV acting. So then why was Hunnam pretending he was too good for it?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:So then why was Hunnam pretending he was too good for it? Because he's already achieved what this film will eventually lead to? Why would any actor want to do Fifty Shades of Grey unless it was a career boost? Hunnam was just clever enough to look at all the similar roles in passed years and realise that the people who had them have basically benefited very little.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:16
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:Is there really any debate? It will destroy any of his future prospects. Maybe he will get a few roles from it, but by the time the trilogy has finished he'll be on a downward trend that ends in TV acting. He's already doing TV acting I believe so it'll be no real transition for him  If he has any actual acting chops he'll break the cycle. If he doesn't then definitely that's the usual road.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:Because he's already achieved what this film will eventually lead to? It would be a step up for Hunnam, IMO.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2014 20:17
|
|