|
Say Nothing posted:I'm sure some cunning linguist can confirm/deny this translation... Sort of correct.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2014 15:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 09:59 |
|
If someone got this ironically it would be one of my favorite tattoos of all time.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2014 15:48 |
|
Why does that tattoo of Vincent Price say Kevin?
|
# ? Feb 19, 2014 15:51 |
|
LorrdErnie posted:It's really not that bad. Yeah, in the same way getting punched in the face isn't as bad as getting kicked in the nuts. That is a loving awful tattoo.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2014 16:27 |
|
Loc of fove. Guann gnardpa
|
# ? Feb 20, 2014 08:05 |
|
That owl is loving terrible.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2014 08:31 |
|
Shrapnac posted:Haha, shut up you sad sjw, that tattoo is awful.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2014 08:42 |
|
Copying that character into GIS produces many pictures of Chinese hobos. So I think in Chinese it is correct.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2014 10:51 |
|
Are bad mods also topical? I was looking at a piercer's portfolio that included branding, and this is the point where I closed the page: Linking for the squeamish- it's a black and white picture of someone's really bad branding, done by a professional that owns a shop, not a kitchen wizard: http://i.imgur.com/3cqUH9f.jpg I know branding and scarification aren't going to be nearly as precise as tattoos, but man...those lines are bad, real bad.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 03:52 |
|
I have yet to see a scarification or brand that looks good. Why do people get that poo poo done?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 04:10 |
|
Ok Fella posted:I have yet to see a scarification or brand that looks good. Why do people get that poo poo done? Equal parts stupidity and drunken bravado.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 04:38 |
|
The only good scar stuff I've seen was in some nat geo or discovery documentary where they showed some south east Asian Buddhists (I think they were Theraveda which is like the super old school hardcore primal Buddhist branch) who got these really intricate scarifications done that all looked sort of like the kind of thing you'd see etched into stone on a temple.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 04:44 |
|
El Estrago Bonito posted:The only good scar stuff I've seen was in some nat geo or discovery documentary where they showed some south east Asian Buddhists (I think they were Theraveda which is like the super old school hardcore primal Buddhist branch) who got these really intricate scarifications done that all looked sort of like the kind of thing you'd see etched into stone on a temple. Now that sounds cool looking. To google!
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 05:04 |
|
no way
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 05:32 |
|
Haggis Heed posted:Loc of fove. This script is really bad, but I wonder if it's intended to mimic the handwriting of the grandpa in question? If he always signed cards or whatever that way, bad handwriting and all, and his grandchild got his signature as a tribute tattoo, I actually think it's sort of cute.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 06:10 |
|
That was my read on it, too. I imagine the source image was an old Snoopy birthday card or something. I have a child's understanding of how tattoos work, but I doubt you make stray marks with one the way you do with pens. Dragging the loop on the 'f' in 'of' into the 'l' in 'love' is a total pen-move, and so is the disconnected loop at the bottom of the illegible first word in the second line.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 06:20 |
|
Grape Soda posted:Are bad mods also topical? I was looking at a piercer's portfolio that included branding, and this is the point where I closed the page: Man, Star of David tattoos are whatever, but getting it scarified on you is kind of amazing.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 06:48 |
|
Inspector_666 posted:Man, Star of David tattoos are whatever, but getting it scarified on you is kind of amazing. I had a Jewish friend that used to complain about part of the religion that didn't make sense: "You can get a boob job or a nose job, but one tattoo and you can't be buried in a Jewish cemetery." If that's true (I honestly don't know), maybe scarification is a kind of loophole way of getting a tattoo?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 07:01 |
|
contrapants posted:I had a Jewish friend that used to complain about part of the religion that didn't make sense: "You can get a boob job or a nose job, but one tattoo and you can't be buried in a Jewish cemetery." That's probably more on the rumor side of things, because there's a sort of general "Don't be an rear end in a top hat, especially to other Jews" clause that would usually preclude somebody from refusing burial. I mean, I'm sure the Hassids wouldn't do it, but a Hassidic Jew isn't getting a tattoo to begin with.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 07:03 |
|
There is no rule in Judaism against tattoos. There is one orthodox cemetery that has a rule against them, but other than that it's an old wives tale told by Jewish mothers to keep their kids from getting tattooed. That being said, some Jews do think that it is disrespectful to the Jews who were tattooed against their will in the Holocaust, but that is neither here nor there.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 07:09 |
|
Staryberry posted:There is no rule in Judaism against tattoos. There is one orthodox cemetery that has a rule against them, but other than that it's an old wives tale told by Jewish mothers to keep their kids from getting tattooed. That being said, some Jews do think that it is disrespectful to the Jews who were tattooed against their will in the Holocaust, but that is neither here nor there. Well, other than the whole Leviticus 19:28 bit, anyway.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 08:10 |
|
One Eye Open posted:Well, other than the whole Leviticus 19:28 bit, anyway. Yeah, but if you start turning people away based on Leviticus, no one's gettin' in the drat cemetery. That book has rules against basically everything.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 11:33 |
|
I should have been more clear. There is no rule against being buried in a Jewish cemetery if you are tattooed. As far as I know, the only limitations on burial in a Jewish Cemetery are for non-Jews. While people who commit suicide are technically not allowed to be buried in a Jewish cemetery, most congregations will find that the person was not sane (thus not responsible for his or her actions) or that suicide rather than accident cannot be proved with absolute certainty, allowing the person to be buried in the Jewish Cemetery.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 20:39 |
|
Done well but subject matter.... Infinite Christmas cookies.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 20:44 |
|
Ok Fella posted:I have yet to see a scarification or brand that looks good. Why do people get that poo poo done? Because it was 1998 and it seemed like the thing to do. I wish I had older pictures of my brand but trust me that they do not age well. The scars still look about the same but it is never going to be a super clean look. I don't regret getting them but would not get anymore. Fortunately I grew enough chest hair in my 30's to cover the really bad kitchen wizard scars on my chest. Edit: Also in the late 90's I met these guys in a hardcore band called "the blood of Abraham" who all had their grandfather's camp numbers tattooed on their arms. bongwizzard has a new favorite as of 22:01 on Feb 21, 2014 |
# ? Feb 21, 2014 21:58 |
|
Nascardad posted:Done well but subject matter.... The first one looks really cool, but the last one looks like Christmas.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 22:20 |
|
Nascardad posted:Done well but subject matter.... What is the thing in the middle of the last one supposed to be? It's not in any of the other pics. drat, these lines.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 22:28 |
|
Do you mean the symbol for infinity?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 22:58 |
|
IUG posted:Do you mean the symbol for infinity? The faint marks below that.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 23:06 |
|
Fell asleep on some crumpled paper.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2014 23:30 |
|
One Eye Open posted:Well, other than the whole Leviticus 19:28 bit, anyway. That whole section of Leviticus is about doing things in mourning (shaving, scarring/tattooing, &c.). The Talmud probably has even more prohibitions against all tats, but the Leviticus prohibition really only means you shouldn't get a tattoo of your dead mother.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 16:31 |
|
Colonial Air Force posted:That whole section of Leviticus is about doing things in mourning (shaving, scarring/tattooing, &c.). No it's not. Leviticus 19 is about general rules, it's only Lev.19:28 that mentions mourning, so the scarring and probably tattooing is only in case of mourning. The shaving and cutting of hair on the other hand is a general rule (lev. 19:27).
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 16:48 |
|
bunnielab posted:Because it was 1998 and it seemed like the thing to do. I wish I had older pictures of my brand but trust me that they do not age well. The scars still look about the same but it is never going to be a super clean look. I don't regret getting them but would not get anymore. Fortunately I grew enough chest hair in my 30's to cover the really bad kitchen wizard scars on my chest. The only scarification I've seen that I think really looks good are the super duper traditional ones done in some African tribes. They tend to be entirely non pictorgaphic, and just consist of dots, bands and short lines done in simple patterns that follow the contours of the body or face.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 16:57 |
|
El Estrago Bonito posted:The only good scar stuff I've seen was in some nat geo or discovery documentary where they showed some south east Asian Buddhists (I think they were Theraveda which is like the super old school hardcore primal Buddhist branch) who got these really intricate scarifications done that all looked sort of like the kind of thing you'd see etched into stone on a temple. Here's a guy with a bunch of Buddhist scarifications, obviously not an Asian monk though.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 17:15 |
|
HelloIAmYourHeart posted:Here's a guy with a bunch of Buddhist scarifications, obviously not an Asian monk though. Ribbed. For her pleasure. Seriously tho would scarifying your penis like this make you a hit with the ladies? Someone do it and post a trip report.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 22:47 |
|
It'd probably be a terrible idea since scar tissue is only half as flexible as the tissue it's replacing. Combine that with a super stretchy organ like the penis and well...
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 22:52 |
|
jeebus bob posted:Ribbed. For her pleasure. Alright, trying this. Edit: At hostpital lost penat post mote later.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 22:53 |
|
how does intricate scarring like that look twenty or thirty years down the line? For that matter, how do tattoos done in the bright, crisp intricate modern style look over the following decades, you always see these stunningly beautiful tats when they're fairly fresh, does that last?
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 22:54 |
|
IUG posted:Do you mean the symbol for infinity? No, I mean the marks below that, between the other scars and her navel. I'd usually just assume sheet wrinkles but they're kind of symmetrical so who knows
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 23:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 09:59 |
|
Fatkraken posted:how does intricate scarring like that look twenty or thirty years down the line? For that matter, how do tattoos done in the bright, crisp intricate modern style look over the following decades, you always see these stunningly beautiful tats when they're fairly fresh, does that last? The ink appears to fade and blur due to the effects of time, sunlight, etc. Here's a hint: (click for hugeness)
|
# ? Feb 22, 2014 23:19 |