|
Kiimo's what we'd call an "insider."
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 17:01 |
|
|
Terrifying Effigies posted:Goddamn, that's some crazy yonic imagery right there. I don't think it's even imagery, it's just literally a vagina they're covering with the rest of the art.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 10:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 12:01
|
|
|
Do we need another Thatcher biopic?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 12:08
|
|
|
Distorted Kiwi posted:Michael Douglas has been replaced for the better. Terrifying Effigies posted:Goddamn, that's some crazy yonic imagery right there. And phallic. Look at the bull’s fur pattern between her legs. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 14:38
|
|
|
It's a literal porno movie - those are all porn stars. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 15:30
|
|
|
BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:Yo I'm gonna blow your mind: go check out where the hinges on your doors are. My issue is that the rivets were evenly spaced on the original poster but in the edited version the editor who fixed it neglected to make sure they were evenly spaced again. It's an easy thing to miss, but since the person who made the changes was so careful to get the rest of it right it kinda sticks out like a sore thumb. What on earth is the writing behind the poster? I think its supposed to say "save her" (which is totally superfluous since the poster is actually pretty effective) but there's some extra scribbling that makes it look like Schwarzenegger walked into the media room, saw a poster, signed it, and then the studio thought it was cool and rolled with it. Also I thought that The Last of Us movie wasn't in production yet? Though Breslin is a pretty good choice for Elle, not sure how I feel about Ahnold as Joel.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 15:40
|
|
|
lelandjs posted:My issue is that the rivets were evenly spaced on the original poster but in the edited version the editor who fixed it neglected to make sure they were evenly spaced again. It's an easy thing to miss, but since the person who made the changes was so careful to get the rest of it right it kinda sticks out like a sore thumb. Definitely says Save Her. I think there's a scribbled "maggie" across it too which doesn't help the legibility.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 15:51
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:Definitely says Save Her. I think there's a scribbled "maggie" across it too which doesn't help the legibility. SAVE HER maggie MAGGIE MAGGIE
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 16:05
|
|
|
It's weird that they used Cameron Bailey's quote on there when they pulled the film from the festival he runs. I have no idea what to make of this movie or what the 'film's team' is playing at here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
Nckdictator posted:Wait, it doesn't come out till November I thought. Kiimo is a movie advertising person and gets to see stuff for that purpose way the hell before any of us do. Hearing that the Peanuts movie is rad from him is a good sign, dude generally has Good Taste
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
Compliment appreciated but I must pull back the reins on "rad" that is not how I would describe it and I should qualify my enthusiasm by admitting my nostalgia could easily be clouding my opinion. But if you read the books slash comics this spoiler is kind of cool The little red-haired girl finally speaks to Charlie Brown and it is kind of magical. After 50 years of teasing it was relief in a good way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
My big worry was that Blue Sky was gonna fundamentally misunderstand what made Peanuts good. It sounds like they pretty much get it, and I am so unbelievably down.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
Edit: NDA For instance expect to see a Snoopy / Red Baron dogfight full-blown over the streets of Paris, but Snoopy is still on his doghouse with imaginary guns. kiimo fucked around with this message at 06:36 on Apr 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:I dunno, I think an H. Jon Benjamin Charlie Brown would work. If they literally did Archer with Charlie's appearance that would be fine with me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
kiimo posted:For instance expect to see a Snoopy / Red Baron dogfight full-blown over the streets of Paris, but Snoopy is still on his doghouse with imaginary guns. Oh my god I need to see this movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
The thing I was worried about most was the idea of making it 3D and suddenly it doesn't look like Peanuts anymore, it looks like the bloated balloon monstrosities that hover above the Macy's parade and don't look like the characters at all. Or like when South Park goes 3D and their heads are suddenly these gigantic things or a stuffed Stewie from Family Guy doll that looks like a football and not like Stewie. But somehow they managed through technical wizardry to keep the brand identity intact. All the expressions are drawn by Schutz that they've re-purposed. It really feels like he's still involved. On the flip side the story IS kind of slow but in my opinion that's the Peanuts brand as well. You go back and re-watch the Christmas special and the pacing is slow. I worry about box office because of that and the expectations kids have for animated features these days but for me, a late-30s fan, I loved it. In fact I teared up at the end. Like Muppets it has a certain tug on the child inside you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
Yeah, slow pacing kind of comes with the territory, if anything that's a good sign.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:If they literally did Archer with Charlie's appearance that would be fine with me. Actually, this would be the worst possible thing. It's like when I see Charlie Brown as Ash shooting his zombified friends ... it just misses the point entirely. No way Chuck doesn't die first. Hell, it's amazing if he isn't Patient Zero. He's not a badass and he never will be. He's just a sad, sensitive kid who has to keep trying because what other choice does he really have? This sounds like it could actually be good, but I'm going to just remain cautiously optimistic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
Like you wouldn't want to see Charlie Brown saying that he can't stop guzzling chocolate milk because he's afraid if he stopped the accumulated sugar rush might kill him. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
The fact that it's basically bizarro Charlie is what makes the idea funny, to be fair.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
http://www.whatisdeepfried.com/weaponbrown/story/
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:It's a literal porno movie - those are all porn stars. What lousy porn names. They're supposed to be called stuff like Gill Hung, and Amber SpanXXX, and Vance Rockets, and Tina Juggstein.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
Weapon Brown can eat my whole dick. I despise it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 07:59
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:What lousy porn names. They're supposed to be called stuff like Gill Hung, and Amber SpanXXX, and Vance Rockets, and Tina Juggstein. Porn pseudonyms didn't get really goofy until like the late '80s. During porn's weird spike in legitimacy in the early '70s you could get away with calling yourself something fairly plain like Jamie Gillis or Gloria Leonard. (Jamie Gillis looks just like Eric Bogosian. (Not gonna play dumb, I watch an old porno once in a while and so should you all.))
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 11:57
|
|
|
The porn best names sound like double entendres when you say them but aren't. Harry Reems and Dirk Diggler are good examples of this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 12:45
|
|
|
 Tomorrowland has been renamed to Project T in Belgium and the Netherlands. Apparently it has something to do with the EDM event Tomorrowland. I guess they didn't want to lure people in under false pretenses, because it's very easy to confuse that with a sci-fi movie starring George Clooney by a small studio like Disney. So yes, finally a movie retitling that is more generic than Live Free or Die Hard becoming Die Hard 4.0 Mierenneuker fucked around with this message at 14:35 on Apr 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 14:31
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:
Tomorrowland the festival is higher in google results! To be honest, Project T sounds even more like some music event. In Russia it is called "The Land of Tomorrow", missing the Disneyland/EPCOT connotation and thus making it even more generic and unappealing (I don't see the appeal of that movie either way, save for Brad Bird reputation).
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
Should have called it Edge Of Tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 14:54
|
|
|
Sounds like it has a different title in every territory, in France it's "à la poursuite de demain" (Looking for tomorrow) Tomorrowland (the theme park) is known as Discoveryland in Disneyland Paris. It's a more steampunk, Jules Verne, late 19th century etc... theme, so I guess it wouldn't fit the modern space aesthetic of this movie. Kurtofan fucked around with this message at 15:03 on Apr 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:
Until I read your post I thought it said "Disney Project" like it was just a placeholder until they came up with a name.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
It's called Disney Tomorrowland: A World Beyond here in the UK which is just 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
Kramjacks posted:Until I read your post I thought it said "Disney Project" like it was just a placeholder until they came up with a name. That's what I thought. Or that it was a parody Photoshop.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
Allyn posted:It's called Disney Tomorrowland: A World Beyond here in the UK which is just That's even worse than the arhythmic Marvel Avengers Assemble.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 15:59
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:That's even worse than the arhythmic Marvel Avengers Assemble. Well we couldn't have Emma Peel fans getting confused.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 16:29
|
|
|
Kramjacks posted:Until I read your post I thought it said "Disney Project" like it was just a placeholder until they came up with a name. No,no "Disney Project" is whatever the hell DisneyTek is working on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:Should have called it Edge Of Tomorrow. Nah, should be All You Need Is E-Ticket.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Nah, should be All You Need Is E-Ticket. I'm partial to Wait, Ride, Repeat.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Nah, should be All You Need Is E-Ticket. Dr. Hurt posted:I'm partial to Wait, Ride, Repeat. Bless you both
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2015 17:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 17:01 |
|
|
78: the Final Chapters Because putting "the Final Chapter" on yer movie is a sure sign of quality            Love Me Once Again 3: the Final Chapter (South Korea, 1971)
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2015 02:22
|
|
