|
    
The MSJ fucked around with this message at 01:20 on Mar 18, 2017 |
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 06:07 |
|
|
 e: aw man wtf it worked in the preview. fine. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Big D
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
MorgaineDax posted:I would like to hear about bad dress. The gist that it wasn't feminist enough and that she refused to wear a corset because corsets = bad, even though plenty of actresses could and have worn corsets, and it's not the ridiculous kind of organ destroying corset of ye olde days. Corsets are intended to support the form of dresses, not squeeze the organs out of you. She also demanded total creative control over the dress and now instead of it being designed by someone who knows how to create period accurate and interesting dresses, it looks like a 4 yo slapped sparkles and ruffles all nilly willy over it. Many are upset at Watson due to this potentially ruining the clothing designer's career(s) just because she didn't like a dress. Belle's yellow dress, though not being period accurate in the cartoon film, is quite iconic and there was potential to make another such iconic dress in this new movie. Links go to images of the dress. Not sure if it counts are spoilers or not but I'll still link it. https://68.media.tumblr.com/11c7f91144e069b1ebf048a7810a37dc/tumblr_inline_omtd3zVn0W1udytem_540.png https://68.media.tumblr.com/948060b7a5c6c188db37767089ab63fe/tumblr_inline_omtd7eTSff1udytem_540.png
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
Could u post links going over this please? e: CineD is all about primary sources, we love five things in CineD: primary sources, posdting the year & D.p. of movies, pretending 2 agree with film analysis to trick outsiders into embarassing themselves, and A/B testing Hat Thoughts fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Mar 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
How dare that loving oval office assert any form of creative control! 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:How dare that loving oval office assert any form of creative control! 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
value-brand cereal posted:The gist that it wasn't feminist enough and that she refused to wear a corset because corsets = bad, even though plenty of actresses could and have worn corsets, and it's not the ridiculous kind of organ destroying corset of ye olde days. Corsets are intended to support the form of dresses, not squeeze the organs out of you. She also demanded total creative control over the dress and now instead of it being designed by someone who knows how to create period accurate and interesting dresses, it looks like a 4 yo slapped sparkles and ruffles all nilly willy over it. Many are upset at Watson due to this potentially ruining the clothing designer's career(s) just because she didn't like a dress. Belle's yellow dress, though not being period accurate in the cartoon film, is quite iconic and there was potential to make another such iconic dress in this new movie. If a six year old sees it, will they think Emma Watson is wearing a pretty dress? If so they've made a successful Belle dress.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
Hat Thoughts posted:Could u post links going over this please? If there's a thread to stick it in, sure. I think this one's been derailed enough over Watson's career lol You also forget the sixth favorite thing: bolding movie titles for some reason or another, even in tiny, two sentence paragraphs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:If a six year old sees it, will they think Emma Watson is wearing a pretty dress? If so they've made a successful Belle dress. I dunno, ask a 6 year old. Or all of them?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
value-brand cereal posted:If there's a thread to stick it in, sure. I think this one's been derailed enough over Watson's career lol just post it here, please
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
value-brand cereal posted:If there's a thread to stick it in, sure. I think this one's been derailed enough over Watson's career lol parenthetical year
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 07:45
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:Big D Also drat, whoa. Everybody check out that junk. Are there poster precedents for tight jeans containing a huge package? I want to see them
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 07:47
|
|
|
value-brand cereal posted:The gist that it wasn't feminist enough and that she refused to wear a corset because corsets = bad, even though plenty of actresses could and have worn corsets, and it's not the ridiculous kind of organ destroying corset of ye olde days. Corsets are intended to support the form of dresses, not squeeze the organs out of you. She also demanded total creative control over the dress and now instead of it being designed by someone who knows how to create period accurate and interesting dresses, it looks like a 4 yo slapped sparkles and ruffles all nilly willy over it. Many are upset at Watson due to this potentially ruining the clothing designer's career(s) just because she didn't like a dress. Belle's yellow dress, though not being period accurate in the cartoon film, is quite iconic and there was potential to make another such iconic dress in this new movie.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:Also drat, whoa. Everybody check out that junk. Are there poster precedents for tight jeans containing a huge package? I want to see them 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 15:48
|
|
|
It took me chasing down quotes about big dicks to get me to pay enough attention to Mindhorn to notice that it's got Julian Barratt in it
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 16:07
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:It took me chasing down quotes about big dicks to get me to pay enough attention to Mindhorn to notice that it's got Julian Barratt in it If Noel's in it too that's a must see.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:Also drat, whoa. Everybody check out that junk. Are there poster precedents for tight jeans containing a huge package? I want to see them 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
According to Keith Richards Mick Jagger has a tiny dilz but huge gonads. So from his bulge it looks like he has a massive schlong but that's just a mirage created by his engorged nutsack.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
During that era it was apparently a trend amongst that set to get an erection, put a cock ring on, and squeeze into some tight jeans and walk around that way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:02
|
|
|
I'm really interested to see if this sticks to being a post-apocalyptic fantasy western thing or embraces the absolute bugfuck insanity of the later books.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
1stGear posted:I'm really interested to see if this sticks to being a post-apocalyptic fantasy western thing or embraces the absolute bugfuck insanity of the later books. The leaked trailer definitely looked like they were mashing up the Jake stuff from The Wastelands into The Gunslinger.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
I didn't know Mathew Mcconaughey was so short
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:57
|
|
|
THE.......idris elba
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 07:04
|
|
|
1stGear posted:I'm really interested to see if this sticks to being a post-apocalyptic fantasy western thing or embraces the absolute bugfuck insanity of the later books. I would def appreciate seeing them have to save a CG young Steven King from the Evil Haunted Van that the Crimson King sent to destroy the universe by running him over while he's jogging.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 08:05
|
|
|
Can't wait to see The Idris Elba Matthew McConaughey Dark Tower
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 08:25
|
|
|
"Hmmm. We need a poster for this movie called The Dark Tower that jumps between modern New York and another world that has a Dark Tower in it. How do we cleverly illustrate this?" "I know - let's use complementary outlines that form a Dark Tower made completely from white light!" "That will make the skyline look weird." "Well, what if we turn the skyline upside down like on the Doctor Strange poster?" "Genius. Tell the Photoshop kid he has 15 minutes."
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 10:11
|
|
|
That poster rules. Is there any clearer look at the fellow in the top left? The image is poorly scaled at full res.  I do like that those two in the city barely register. It's the extreme other end to floating heads.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 13:14
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:The leaked trailer definitely looked like they were mashing up the Jake stuff from The Wastelands into The Gunslinger. They're mixing a lot of things in. Official photos indicate that they are also introducing elements from books 6 and 7 into this movie. That's probably one of the more brilliant things about this series. That they can change so much, and still have it be canonical. The movie was originally supposed to be out by now, but they pushed it back to the summer. I wonder if that was a sign of faith, or that it's absolutely terrible. The fact that they haven't released an official trailer does worry me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
They will always show something new on the 19th of every month. The movie is also confirmed to be a sequel to the books. New cycle, but Roland now has the Horn.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:During that era it was apparently a trend amongst that set to get an erection, put a cock ring on, and squeeze into some tight jeans and walk around that way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:That poster rules. I'm assuming that's Jackie Earle Haley's character.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Nihonniboku posted:They're mixing a lot of things in. Official photos indicate that they are also introducing elements from books 6 and 7 into this movie. It'll probably be pretty terrible, but the fact that they've rewritten so much means that it might actually work as a movie. And no official trailer, even months after the leak of one, and a six month delay doesnt look good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
I haven't read them, but supposedly this isn't an adaptation of the books. It's a sequel-slash-remix, which shows the events that happen when he walks through the door the final time with the horn.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
So how many books do I have to read to prepare myself for this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
FreudianSlippers posted:According to Keith Richards Mick Jagger has a tiny dilz but huge gonads. So from his bulge it looks like he has a massive schlong but that's just a mirage created by his engorged nutsack. That's a nice burn by Keith, but that photo isn't Mick.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
Rad Lieutenant posted:So how many books do I have to read to prepare myself for this? Ideally, none. It's a sequel/remix/alternate take so it should be able to stand on its own.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 06:07 |
|
|
Out of interest can anyone think of an adaptation where reading the book is preferable?
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 19:53
|
|