Most interesting conference championship game This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
American Athletic | 15 | 10.07% | |
Atlantic Coast | 29 | 19.46% | |
Big 12 | 14 | 9.40% | |
Big Ten | 38 | 25.50% | |
Conference USA | 5 | 3.36% | |
Mid-American | 4 | 2.68% | |
Mountain West | 1 | 0.67% | |
Pacific-12 | 2 | 1.34% | |
Southeastern | 41 | 27.52% | |
Total: | 149 votes |
|
Conference championships are set! ACC: Clemson vs. Miami Big 12: Oklahoma vs. TCU Big Ten: Wisconsin vs. Ohio State Pac-12: Southern California vs. Stanford (probably) SEC: Auburn vs. Georgia AAC: Central Florida vs. Memphis C-USA: Florida Atlantic vs. North Texas MAC: Toledo vs. Akron MW: Fresno State vs. Boise State The Sun Belt's champion will be determined by the winner of Arkansas State-Troy and whether or not Appalachian State wins their game. Oh, and Bama lost.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 10:41 |
|
Fire Tim Beck edit: Also the conference championship games are super cool and interesting this year. At least two are defacto playoff games, and maybe the big10 too. G-Hawk fucked around with this message at 04:37 on Nov 26, 2017 |
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:35 |
|
The Michigan season ended pretty much as I assumed it would, but we did hang in there against Ohio State for a while. Nine months until it really begins anew.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:36 |
|
we flipped the script(TM) and could get to 10 wins so that is cool dave warner and most of our coordinators and assistants are still loving trash and dantonio needs to stop defending idiots
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:40 |
|
Feel like we're going to come up short of major fuckery this year and it'll just be ACC/SEC/B10/B12 conference winners regardless of who. If Miami hadn't putzed around then an OSU or TCU win would have been prime to get two ACC teams in but otherwise seems boring this year. Getting to this week was fun but I don't think anything wacky is going to happen.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:40 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:Feel like we're going to come up short of major fuckery this year and it'll just be ACC/SEC/B10/B12 conference winners regardless of who. If Miami hadn't putzed around then an OSU or TCU win would have been prime to get two ACC teams in but otherwise seems boring this year. tcu isn't going to the playoffs lol the only debate will be if wisconsin loses and oklahoma wins, is it bama or ohio state. every other scenario sorts itself out
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:41 |
|
G-Hawk posted:tcu isn't going to the playoffs lol You think? The losses are respectable enough and they'd have a win over Okie State and a revenge win over OU. e: holy poo poo that Apple Cup. Crotch Bat fucked around with this message at 04:47 on Nov 26, 2017 |
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:44 |
|
This loss means that Nick Saban can pour his energies into an extra full week of recruiting.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:47 |
|
i am told there was a football game involving my team and the sooners. i am not sure it happened.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:47 |
|
#neveragain
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:48 |
|
Playoff pecking order seems pretty clear (order of the top four is arbitrary) 1) Auburn/Georgia winner 2) Clemson/Miami winner 3) Wisconsin (if they win) 4) Oklahoma (if they win) 5) Alabama 6) Ohio State/TCU/Notre Dame/USC/Washington (if they win) I have to think Bama is first alternate if Wisconsin or Oklahoma lose, but if both lose- hold onto your butts, it's gonna get wild. General Dog fucked around with this message at 04:52 on Nov 26, 2017 |
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:49 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:i am told there was a football game involving my team and the sooners. i am not sure it happened. Not that I think you'd have won but it sucks Grier had to miss the game because I think you guys could have put up some crazy numbers together, one of those 100 point, 1300 yard games.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:51 |
|
General Dog posted:Playoff pecking order seems pretty clear (order of the top four is arbitrary) Oklahoma is prolly going to be #1 tuesday and will have wins over a bunch of top 25 teams, including two teams currently in the top 10 and the Heisman winner. If chalk holds, they're almost assuredly going to be the 1 or 2 seed Crotch Bat posted:Not that I think you'd have won but it sucks Grier had to miss the game because I think you guys could have put up some crazy numbers together, one of those 100 point, 1300 yard games. yeah though props to dana because the offense actually played pretty well. the wild cat owned. it mostly a couple of early missed chances (a fumble at the 11 down 4, and 6" from recovering an onside when it was still close.) the defense got housed, but oklahoma's offense is really, really loving good
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:51 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Oklahoma is prolly going to be #1 tuesday and will have wins over a bunch of top 25 teams, including two teams currently in the top 10 and the Heisman winner. If chalk holds, they're almost assuredly going to be the 1 or 2 seed Yeah like I said, the order of the top four is arbitrary, but they're all in if they win.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:53 |
|
By rule, it's never allowed to be pretty, but the Territorial Cup has been returned to its rightful home in Tempe. Demario Richard ran real hard all game. It was a lovely way for him to close out his ASU career. Go Devils!
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:57 |
|
Mayfield's stats are absurd. That YPA combined with the completion percentage http://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/550373/baker-mayfield
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:58 |
|
I predict that OU will not finish #3 or #4.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 04:59 |
|
General Dog posted:Playoff pecking order seems pretty clear (order of the top four is arbitrary) Notre Dame is losing right now, so I took them out.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:00 |
|
Not that it matters a ton but why would OU jump Clemson this week? Clemson is kicking the poo poo out of a better team than WV (at least with Grier out). And Clemson's win against Auburn is looking even better.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:00 |
|
Hail Xort
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:01 |
|
Oklahoma averaged 12 yards per play today.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:01 |
|
General Dog posted:Playoff pecking order seems pretty clear (order of the top four is arbitrary) Washington's DOA because they can't qualify for the Pac-12 title game, and the committee won't bother with a 3-loss Stanford. It's USC or bust for the conference.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:02 |
|
By virtue of their head-to-head record, Stanford would be in the Pac-12 Championship over Washington. e: Beaten like a Coog.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:03 |
|
Benne posted:Washington's DOA because they can't qualify for the Pac-12 title game, and the committee won't bother with a 3-loss Stanford. It's USC or bust for the conference. Ah poo poo I didn't realize that, my East Coast bias is showing. So yeah, USC is the only hope for the Pac-12, and if Notre Dame manages to come back against Stanford it might be hard to justify taking them.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:04 |
|
i really have no idea how USC would have a path, in part because Stanford isn't going to be a super impressive win, if they win. And looks like ND is toast, now
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:05 |
|
The more I think about it, the more I realize it's probably just 1) Auburn/Georgia winner 2) Clemson/Miami winner 3) Wisconsin (if they win) 4) Oklahoma (if they win) 5) Alabama 6) Ohio State (if they win)
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:07 |
|
The American Athletic Conference and CBS Sports Network are garbage organizations that stole Tulane's victory. The unlikely quest for a bad bowl was almost complete, they had marched down the field as time expired. I was there, I watched Banks get the touch down with seconds left. The bad refs made no call, then gave it to SMU. He was in. CBS Sports Network is too cheap for the pile on camera and the American is too garbage to require one. Tulane should be going to a bad bowl. Dumb garbage stopped them from getting there. I have no ill will towards SMU but that was the worst call I've seen all season and what a time for that to happen. Next season, Tulane's quest for a bad bowl will be completed.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:07 |
|
Spacebump posted:The American Athletic Conference and CBS Sports Network are garbage organizations that stole Tulane's victory. The unlikely quest for a bad bowl was almost complete, they had marched down the field as time expired. I was there, I watched Banks get the touch down with seconds left. The bad refs made no call, then gave it to SMU. He was in. CBS Sports Network is too cheap for the pile on camera and the American is too garbage to require one. Tulane should be going to a bad bowl. Dumb garbage stopped them from getting there. I have no ill will towards SMU but that was the worst call I've seen all season and what a time for that to happen. Next season, Tulane's quest for a bad bowl will be completed. It's a "pylon"
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:08 |
|
General Dog posted:The more I think about it, the more I realize it's probably just thats where i'm at, with the most likely debate being Alabama/Ohio State if Ohio State roasts Wisconsin real bad. Maaaaybe TCU sneaks into the conversation if they absolutely demolish Oklahoma, but that seems unlikely. I don't think anyone beyond that has any path
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:08 |
|
The only offensive players in the Big12 who should be eligible for the Heisman should be RBs. Everything else is mostly pyrrhic for offense in that league Go a Black Knight
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/CodyWorsham/status/934634617025499136
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:10 |
|
UF looked like garbage, giving up 21 points off turnovers (pick-6, scoop-n-score, pick return inside the 5 resulting in TD). UF managed to lose out on the best available coach and get stomped by the worst FSU team in my lifetime. Not a wonderful Saturday. However, we finished 4-7 and I don't have to watch another down of Nussmeier playcalling. I'm glad there's finally a dagger in this team.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:14 |
|
I have nothing to say other than I desperately hope someone, anyone, stops Clemson from winning two national titles in a row.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:15 |
|
RumbleFish posted:I have nothing to say other than I desperately hope someone, anyone, stops Clemson from winning two national titles in a row. Yeah, but math tells me it'll be 70 years before they win another
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:19 |
|
I honestly felt worse about the Oregon loss this year, I just have already dealt with so much post Dawkins stress that it's hard to feel bad, or, anything at all, about a loss wherein he was required to be on the field for roughly half the game. Hopefully Tate is ready to go by the bowl game this year and Arizona can do a bunch of fun stuff there.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:19 |
|
General Dog posted:It's a "pylon" Don't pile on his misery, man.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:19 |
|
General Dog posted:It's a "pylon" I'm so dang mad I can't even spell anymore.
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:26 |
|
Rick posted:I honestly felt worse about the Oregon loss this year, I just have already dealt with so much post Dawkins stress that it's hard to feel bad, or, anything at all, about a loss wherein he was required to be on the field for roughly half the game. Hopefully Tate is ready to go by the bowl game this year and Arizona can do a bunch of fun stuff there. RichRod didn't take it very well: http://www.abc15.com/sports/sports-...torial-cup-game
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:32 |
|
Is it theoretically possible Clemson, Alabama, and Auburn could all make the playoff? And Auburn would have to close out the season playing Alabama twice, Georgia twice, and Clemson a second time?
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 10:41 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Is it theoretically possible Clemson, Alabama, and Auburn could all make the playoff? And Auburn would have to close out the season playing Alabama twice, Georgia twice, and Clemson a second time? Very possible really. If Clemson wins and then Oklahoma loses and/or Ohio State mehs their way to a disappointing win then Alabama will 2011 their way in
|
# ? Nov 26, 2017 05:35 |