Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
pentyne
Nov 7, 2012
There's a couple of anecdotes about Rothfuss being a creepy old dude at cons and such but nothing will ever top the complete level of hosed up writing that was his lotr blog post.

That kind of blew the lid off his very weird views on women and suddenly his brand of being a proud feminist is much more obviously just talk and not anything he means.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dienes
Nov 4, 2009

dee
doot doot dee
doot doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot


College Slice

pentyne posted:

There's a couple of anecdotes about Rothfuss being a creepy old dude at cons and such but nothing will ever top the complete level of hosed up writing that was his lotr blog post.

That kind of blew the lid off his very weird views on women and suddenly his brand of being a proud feminist is much more obviously just talk and not anything he means.

He mistakes benevolent sexism as feminism and objectification as compliments.

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.

Dienes posted:

He mistakes benevolent sexism as feminism and objectification as compliments.

Truly, he is but the apprentice to master Whedon.

TheGreatEvilKing
Mar 28, 2016





pentyne posted:

There's a couple of anecdotes about Rothfuss being a creepy old dude at cons and such but nothing will ever top the complete level of hosed up writing that was his lotr blog post.

That kind of blew the lid off his very weird views on women and suddenly his brand of being a proud feminist is much more obviously just talk and not anything he means.

Link?

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat
It's been posted a lot in this thread already.

Patrick Rothfuss, feminist, posted:

It will be a good movie. Maybe even a great movie. But it will also be, at best, a moderately okay adaptation of the subtle, sweet book that I grew up loving.

You know that it’s going to be like? It’s going to be like wandering onto an internet porn site and seeing a video of a girl I had a crush on in high school. You probably knew someone like her. The smart girl. The shy girl. The one who wore glasses and was a little socially awkward. The one who screwed up the curve in chemistry so you got an A- instead of an A.

She was a geek girl before anybody knew what a geek girl was. And that was kinda awesome, because you were a geek boy before being a geek was culturally acceptable.

You liked her because she was funny. And she was smart. And you could actually talk to her. And she read books.

And sure, she was girl-shaped, and that was cool. And she was cute, in an understated, freckly way. And sometimes you’d stare at her breasts when you were supposed to be paying attention in biology. But you were 16. You stared at everyone’s breasts back then.

And yeah, you had some fantasies about her, because, again, you were 16. But they were fairly modest fantasies about making out in the back of a car. Maybe you’d get to second base. Maybe you could steal third if you were lucky.

And maybe, just maybe, something delightful and terrifying might happen. And yeah, it would probably be awkward and fumbling at times, but that’s okay because she’d be doing half the fumbling too. Because the only experience either one of you had was from books. And afterwards, if you make a Star Wars joke, you know she’ll get it, and she’ll laugh….

That’s the girl you fell in love with in high school. You didn’t have a crush on her because she was some simmering pool of molten sex. You loved her because she was subtle and sweet and smart and special.

So you stroll onto this porn site, and there she is. Except now she’s wearing a thong and a black leather halter top. She’s wearing gently caress-me red lipstick and a lot of dark eye makeup. Her breasts are amazing now, proud and perfectly round.

Someone’s taught her to dance, and she does it well. She’s flexible and tan. She has a flat midriff and walks like a high-class Vegas stripper. Her eyes are dark and smouldering. She has a riding crop, and she likes to be tied up, and her too-red mouth forms a perfect circle as she sighs and moans, and tosses her head in a performance designed to win any number of academy awards….

And what’s the problem with this? Well… in some ways, nothing. What you’ve found is perfectly good porn. Maybe even great porn.

But in other ways the problem is blindingly obvious. This girl has nothing in common with your high-school crush except for her social security number. Everything you loved about her is gone.

We loved the sweet, shy, freckly girl. We still remember her name, and after all these years she lives close to our heart. Seeing her in lipstick and stiletto heels dancing on a pole is like watching Winnie the Pooh do heroin and then glass someone in a bar fight.

It just isn’t something that I look forward to seeing….

TheGreatEvilKing
Mar 28, 2016





Wait, that was about Lord of the Rings?????

HIJK
Nov 25, 2012
in the room where you sleep
lol I forgot it was all a convoluted metaphor for LOTR

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



Dienes posted:

benevolent sexism

Who the what now? Do you mean faux chivalry?

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat
I think my favorite part is that he watches pole dancing on PornHub.

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

Wait, that was about Lord of the Rings?????

HIJK posted:

lol I forgot it was all a convoluted metaphor for LOTR
The Hobbit, but yeah.

Benson Cunningham
Dec 9, 2006

Chief of J.U.N.K.E.R. H.Q.

Sham bam bamina! posted:


The Hobbit, but yeah.

There is no defense for the Hobbit (the movie). It's awful.

Don't let that distract from Rothfuss being terrible too.

Illuyankas
Oct 22, 2010

Who writes a blog post slutshaming a movie trilogy without realising how awful an idea it is and throwing their keyboard into the sea, god drat

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

Illuyankas posted:

Who writes a blog post slutshaming a movie trilogy without realising how awful an idea it is and throwing their keyboard into the sea, god drat

This was before it even came out too. He slutshamed it just on the idea that they were making movies about the Hobbit. That was the thing that got him mad enough to write such sexist garbage.

Dienes
Nov 4, 2009

dee
doot doot dee
doot doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot


College Slice

eXXon posted:

Who the what now? Do you mean faux chivalry?

No, I meant what I said.

Benevolent sexism represents evaluations of gender that may appear subjectively positive (subjective to the person who is evaluating), but are actually damaging to people and gender equality more broadly (e.g., the ideas that women need to be protected by men). Sets up the idea that women require protection and control for their own good Its also a major part of relegating women to specific gender roles, into things like being fuckmaids, and out of things like STEM. Benevolent sexism is the other side of the coin to hostile sexism, the aggressive, often violent, overt sexism that springs to mind when you think of sexism. Except they move together - where you see greater levels of benevolent sexism, you also see greater levels of hostile sexism, and vice versa. It is in effect the reason for the Madonna-whore complex, as illustrated so nicely in that Rothfuss blog post. Hostile sexism says all women are whores, benevolent sexism is women are naturally pure and their sexuality must be protected and controlled. One of the tricky things about it is that it is often difficult to confront. Most people won't say you're over-reacting when you call out someone for saying women are sub-humans who don't deserve to vote, but since benevolent sexism is 'meant to be nice' calling it out often results in you being the bitch.

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012
The thing that gets me about the post is he is so extremely specific about the "hypothetical" woman in question that it must be an actual person he knew that he had all his little fantasies of wooing her and making her see how he was The One for her and later in life she got married/was no longer pure and sent him into a rage spiral that she ruined herself and her angelic potential by not just becoming his tradwife.

Creepy fantasy authors are a pretty low bar to clear to be acceptable but that blog post from a guy who can't cough without reminding people he's a feminist would've torched his brand if the industry was even 10% better about these things.

Carillon
May 9, 2014






It also comes across pretty strongly that he doesn't view that woman as a person. Chris, what an rear end in a top hat.

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

quote:

We loved the sweet, shy, freckly girl. We still remember her name, and after all these years she lives close to our heart. Seeing her in lipstick and stiletto heels dancing on a pole is like watching Winnie the Pooh do heroin and then glass someone in a bar fight.

I can't even pick out the worst part of it because reading it carefully for details makes my skin crawl, but the line "they have nothing in common but their social security number" is one of the most dehumanizing things I've ever read that someone tried to frame as poetic or meaningful. He's literally defined her entire identity by physical characteristics and once those changed the person he "loved" is dead to him.

It's interesting to see that almost all of the book 3 chat on r/kingkiller is firmly "yeah it's not happening, Rothfuss has been lying" and even the people mustering up a half hearted defense are saying it doesn't matter why anymore because his entire brand has been about him making all these claims of progress like the book 3 "draft" and if he just flat out said he was struggling and couldn't write he'd probably get way more support and sympathy. Someone linked this lovely quote from 2007

quote:

Interviewer: " What can readers expect from the two sequels and the trilogy that will follow this one? "

Rothfuss: "Well…. I’ve already written them. So you won’t have to wait forever for them to come out. They’ll be released on a regular schedule. One per year.

You can also expect the second book to be written with the same degree of care and detail as this first one. You know the sophomore slump? When a writer’s second novel is weaker because they’re suddenly forced to write under deadline? I don’t have to worry about that because my next two novels are already good to go."

13 years.

pentyne fucked around with this message at 19:53 on Aug 10, 2020

Heath
Apr 30, 2008

🍂🎃🏞️💦
That is some heinous and tortured prose

Daric
Dec 23, 2007

Shawn:
Do you really want to know my process?

Lassiter:
Absolutely.

Shawn:
Well it starts with a holla! and ends with a Creamsicle.
He was close to being profound there but, as usual, takes it into creep territory instead. I mean, for people we don't interact with anymore, their version of us in their minds is nothing more than a memory. But he states that in the worst way.

Heath
Apr 30, 2008

🍂🎃🏞️💦

Daric posted:

He was close to being profound there but, as usual, takes it into creep territory instead. I mean, for people we don't interact with anymore, their version of us in their minds is nothing more than a memory. But he states that in the worst way.

That's the thing, that wasn't the point he was trying to make. All of that was in service of talking about a film adaptation of a book, not how people change over time or how someone reckons with that. The book didn't morph into the movie the way that a teenager ages into an adult. He describes the adaptation of the book by way of a human being, and then describes that human being in purely objectifying and explicitly pornographic terms, and never is anything mentioned about the person in and of themselves, only their relationship to his gratification. Of course, this is a fictional person and in this metaphor a literal object since you're asked to just imagine a woman, but the fact that he is choosing to express this emotion of consumptive media by way of a human being is telling about his psychology, not least of which because this very thread evidences that this isn't something he has done in isolation - he constantly does it. If he approached any kind of profound thought, it's purely incidental.

Patware
Jan 3, 2005

btw would love to watch winnie the pooh just absolutely clean out a bar

Lottery of Babylon
Apr 25, 2012

STRAIGHT TROPIN'

Patware posted:

btw would love to watch winnie the pooh just absolutely clean out a bar

He's doing that a lot in hong kong atm

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.

I was expecting the Goldberry+Devi fanfic and got something even worse.

pentyne posted:

The thing that gets me about the post is he is so extremely specific about the "hypothetical" woman in question that it must be an actual person he knew that he had all his little fantasies of wooing her and making her see how he was The One for her and later in life she got married/was no longer pure and sent him into a rage spiral that she ruined herself and her angelic potential by not just becoming his tradwife.

Creepy fantasy authors are a pretty low bar to clear to be acceptable but that blog post from a guy who can't cough without reminding people he's a feminist would've torched his brand if the industry was even 10% better about these things.

There is absolutely zero doubt on this. Considering how much of his writing is his personal (power)fantasies there's absolutely a geek girl he had a crush on in high school who made life choices that ruined his image of her or, you know, went from being a teenager in high school to a woman in control of her own life.

Dienes
Nov 4, 2009

dee
doot doot dee
doot doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot
doot doot dee
dee doot doot


College Slice

Evil Fluffy posted:

I was expecting the Goldberry+Devi fanfic and got something even worse.


There is absolutely zero doubt on this. Considering how much of his writing is his personal (power)fantasies there's absolutely a geek girl he had a crush on in high school who made life choices that ruined his image of her or, you know, went from being a teenager in high school to a woman in control of her own life.

Did she even change? It reads like she went from a girl he barely knew/interacted with and filed in the gaps with his own desires to a woman he barely knew and filled in the gaps with his own desires (that he then shames her for).

HIJK
Nov 25, 2012
in the room where you sleep
Rothfuss also wrote tantrumy reviews on Goodreads regarding the children's books about Eloise, trying to tie it to the Ugly American stereotype and ranting about how Eloise was a horrible oval office or something for the crime of being a little girl. Never mind that it was a children's picture book series about a 6 year old girl who lives in the Plaza that was written by the terrific actress Kay Thompson, herself an accomplished musician, actress, radio star, and composer.

Rothfuss hates any :females: he can't gently caress and like that creative writing exercise shows, goes into a flustered rage when women are unavailable or have sex with men that aren't him. The fact that he also extends this to :females: characters in picture books is what stands out to me.

Precambrian Video Games
Aug 19, 2002



The first two Kingkiller books were obviously his self-therapy for being such a loser in high school and presumably undergrad too. Now that Rothfuss' implausible Gary Stu self-insert has had all of the sex, he has basically accomplished everything he needed to. Finish wizard school? Eh, whatever. Who wants to be a washed up magic professor anyway? Kill kings? He taught the sex goddess how to gently caress better; he has better things to do. Revenge for the murder of his parents? Who even remembers that plot line? What were their names again? Did Kvothe even bring up his parents again except to creepily describe how they made music together and then made music together?

If Rothfuss had had some memorable antagonist in his teenage years you can bet that they'd be in the books but it's clear that nothing motivates him to write like unrequited lust.

TheGreatEvilKing
Mar 28, 2016





It's kind of amazing how little Kvothe achieved to be this supposedly legendary outlaw. He, uh, helped a mayor get laid, killed a nonthreatening not a dragon by getting it super high, didn't get anywhere with Denna, banged some women with low standards, and supposedly made out with the sex goddess in a way no one can prove or disprove.

TV Zombie
Sep 6, 2011

Burying all the trauma from past nights
Burying my anger in the past

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

It's kind of amazing how little Kvothe achieved to be this supposedly legendary outlaw. He, uh, helped a mayor get laid, killed a nonthreatening not a dragon by getting it super high, didn't get anywhere with Denna, banged some women with low standards, and supposedly made out with the sex goddess in a way no one can prove or disprove.

Maybe this is just the tip of the iceberg and we will really get to the awesome part of his legacy in the next/last book.

Ccs
Feb 25, 2011


So I got the Rogues short story collection from the library because it had a story by Abercrombie. But it also has one by our boy Rothfuss, entitled "The Lighting Tree". That's a pretty good title, you'd expect maybe some interesting things would happen in this story? Well interesting things almost do happen, in that they're talked about, but the whole story is actually about Bast being a lech.

The entire text involves Bast hanging out while boys from the town come to trade him things for secrets and vice versa. Bast then has a lot of sex. He walks by a shepherdess and then they have sex. He trades one of the kids a secret to find out where another woman bathes, and then they have sex. He helps another kid chase his abusive father out of town (this is the humanizing moment in the story for Bast) but he also stops by their house and has sex with the mom.

Rothfuss' prose is competent enough that the story flows fairly well from one instance to the next. There's a nice focus on the natural world which makes the whole thing feel calm and rustic. Combined with all the nudity and hint of mythology it's like being stuck inside a Bougureau painting.

But you get a pretty good sense for what the author thinks of women in a small amount of pages. They're there to look nice and be sexed, and defended from vile abusers. And that's about it.

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

It's kind of amazing how little Kvothe achieved to be this supposedly legendary outlaw. He, uh, helped a mayor get laid, killed a nonthreatening not a dragon by getting it super high, didn't get anywhere with Denna, banged some women with low standards, and supposedly made out with the sex goddess in a way no one can prove or disprove.

Yeah but there was also that bandit camp killing scene which was pretty dope. It was an excellent way to really show off the magic system he spent a book and a half refining. More of that and less of everything else and we're golden.

Edit: the more I think about it the more I like it, it was probably the only time I've read someone so satisfyingly use bloodmagic.

Terror Sweat fucked around with this message at 23:33 on Aug 10, 2020

Benson Cunningham
Dec 9, 2006

Chief of J.U.N.K.E.R. H.Q.
Bast absolutely reads like he dicks down dudes.

Ccs
Feb 25, 2011


Oh and there's a passage that tries to explain that this lechery is happening from both sides, with Bast bathing in a place he knows a lot of women will come watch him. But the women are entirely described as types of birds, which kind of undercuts the "don't worry this isn't sexist" aspect of the scene.

Tree Dude
May 26, 2012

AND MY SONG IS...

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

It's kind of amazing how little Kvothe achieved to be this supposedly legendary outlaw. He, uh, helped a mayor get laid, killed a nonthreatening not a dragon by getting it super high, didn't get anywhere with Denna, banged some women with low standards, and supposedly made out with the sex goddess in a way no one can prove or disprove.

It's especially funny with the way the first book opens and he insists he couldn't possibly tell his story to the chronicler in one day.

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

It's kind of amazing how little Kvothe achieved to be this supposedly legendary outlaw. He, uh, helped a mayor get laid, killed a nonthreatening not a dragon by getting it super high, didn't get anywhere with Denna, banged some women with low standards, and supposedly made out with the sex goddess in a way no one can prove or disprove.

If Rothfuss ever releases another book and tries to pull the "well Kvothe was actually an Unreliable Narrator the whole time" card then I hope he chokes on his hobo beard. There are stories where that works, like FFT, but Kingkiller isn't one of them.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Terror Sweat posted:

Yeah but there was also that bandit camp killing scene which was pretty dope. It was an excellent way to really show off the magic system he spent a book and a half refining. More of that and less of everything else and we're golden.

Edit: the more I think about it the more I like it, it was probably the only time I've read someone so satisfyingly use bloodmagic.

Is this real or “ironic”?

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

I'm serious. I really liked that part of the book, stabbing a dead body to inflict that damage on others like a giant voodoo doll is cool magic IMO

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.
If you want cool voodoo bloodmagic watch The Last Airbender, which has an extremely dark episode on it despite being a show for a younger audience.

TheKennedys
Sep 23, 2006

By my hand, I will take you from this godforsaken internet
That Hobbit post is basically "Centerfold" but twelve minutes long

Raiad
Feb 1, 2005

Without the law, there wouldn't be lawyers.


Terror Sweat posted:

Yeah but there was also that bandit camp killing scene which was pretty dope. It was an excellent way to really show off the magic system he spent a book and a half refining. More of that and less of everything else and we're golden.

Edit: the more I think about it the more I like it, it was probably the only time I've read someone so satisfyingly use bloodmagic.

my reaction to that scene was "oh poo poo, after like 20 hours of audiobook of fuckin nothing happening, we're actually getting somewhere, i can't wait to see the consequences of and followup to all of this"

lol at what the consequences (nothing, not a drat thing) and follow up (loving a fairy for thousands of years or whatever) ended up being

anilEhilated
Feb 17, 2014

But I say fuck the rain.

Grimey Drawer

Ccs posted:

But the women are entirely described as types of birds, which kind of undercuts the "don't worry this isn't sexist" aspect of the scene.
Let me guess - tits?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Antivehicular
Dec 30, 2011


I wanna sing one for the cars
That are right now headed silent down the highway
And it's dark and there is nobody driving And something has got to give

TheKennedys posted:

That Hobbit post is basically "Centerfold" but twelve minutes long

"Centerfold" at least has a punchline

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply