Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.
From USPOL

quote:

As Trump Reels, Fox News Has a Message for Viewers: Stick With Us
As allies abandon the president, his favorite network revives familiar villains for the Biden era. And the prospects for a Trump TV media venture are “greatly diminished.”

By Michael M. Grynbaum
Jan. 9, 2021

His president reeling, his cable network at a crossroads, Tucker Carlson began his show on Thursday night asking a question that has echoed for weeks among anchors and producers at Fox News: “What is life going to be like for us on Jan. 21?”

“Who has got your concerns top of mind? Who wakes up in the middle of the night worried about your family?” Mr. Carlson asked his flock, acknowledging that Mr. Trump would be gone in two weeks “and we cannot change it.”

“The rest of us — and this is the key — will still be here,” he continued. “We’ve got nowhere to go.”

The imminent end of the Trump presidency has presented a challenge to the enormously popular, enormously profitable Fox News — the crown jewel of Rupert Murdoch’s American empire — whose right-wing stars yoked themselves to Mr. Trump more tightly than any other mainstream pundits over the past four years.

Prime-time hosts like Mr. Carlson and Sean Hannity spoke darkly of possible voter fraud and irregularities. But privately, senior figures at the network acknowledged a struggle to thread the needle between the president’s bogus (and possibly defamatory) fraud claims, and the demands of an audience that was increasingly confused at the discrepancies between Mr. Trump’s lies and the reporting on Fox News, which declared Joseph R. Biden Jr. the president-elect on Nov. 7.

Executives at Fox News are unfazed by the lamentations of liberal critics, but the defection of conservative viewers to fringier pro-Trump outlets like Newsmax was more concerning. The prospect of Trump TV, a rival media venture led by the president himself, also loomed.

Now, in the wake of violence at the Capitol and Mr. Trump’s increasing isolation within his own party, Fox News is finding a path forward: sympathize with the grievances of a Trump-adoring audience that has finally acknowledged its tribune has fallen. Become a MAGA safe space.

“Tens of millions of Americans have no chance; they’re about to be crushed by the ascendant left,” Mr. Carlson claimed. “These people need a defender. You need a defender.” It was not hard to deduce whom he had in mind.

Anyone expecting an about-face from Fox News — or an apology, as some liberals might daydream — has not studied its history or that of its owner, Mr. Murdoch, whose ability to adapt to political change is matched only by his reluctance to kowtow to critics.

With Democrats set to take power in Washington, Fox News’s pundits are trotting out the old hits. On his Friday program, which aired shortly after Twitter announced that it had banned the president from its platform, Mr. Hannity promised, rather generically, to “expose what is breathtaking hypocrisy of Democrats and the media mob.” He went on to attack familiar Fox News villains like the Clintons, the Obamas, Madonna and the comedian Kathy Griffin. It could have been a rerun from 2014. (Mr. Hannity, in fact, had pretaped his 9 p.m. show a few hours earlier.)

Mr. Carlson, who was live on Friday, seized on the news that Twitter had closed Mr. Trump’s account, warning his viewers that “the crackdown of America’s civil liberties is coming” and portraying liberals as hellbent on silencing conservative views. But he uttered the word “Trump” only twice over the entire hour.

It took a moment for Fox News’s hosts to recalibrate after the shocking and violent events of the week.

Several network stars, notably the anchor Laura Ingraham and the political analyst Brit Hume, spread a baseless theory that left-wing activists — not Trump supporters — were responsible for the violence at the Capitol. (Ms. Ingraham later tweeted a debunking of the theory.) A guest on Mr. Carlson’s Wednesday show made the same unfounded claim about antifa infiltration, with no pushback from the host. And the news anchor Martha MacCallum initially compared the siege at the heart of American democracy to a minor incident of graffiti at a Republican senator’s house.

By Thursday, amid a flurry of White House resignations and a rising chorus of Republicans declaring that it was time for Mr. Trump to go, there were cracks in the firmament. “To put up a Trump flag and take down the American flag is not patriotic — it was one of the worst things I’ve ever seen,” Brian Kilmeade said on “Fox & Friends.” The false rumors about antifa involvement were dialed back, and hosts criticized the Washington violence.

Still, no Fox News prime-time star has yet blamed Mr. Trump for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol. And rather than reckon with years of backing Mr. Trump and giving comfort to his supporters, the network’s commentators have simply swiveled, finding new ways to take on old targets. In the Fox News universe, Mr. Biden is now a socialist prepared to upend the American way of life. And many hosts have drawn a direct equivalence between the storming of the Capitol by an anti-democratic mob and the Black Lives Matters protests over the summer in support of racial justice.

As repulsive as such rhetoric may be to liberals, it is part of a formula that has rarely failed Fox News, which remains the profit engine of Mr. Murdoch’s Fox Corporation.

The network’s ratings fell after Election Day, and it has lost badly to CNN in the ratings since the riot at the Capitol. But in 2020 as a whole, Fox News was the third-most-watched network in the country in prime-time on weekdays. That was not just cable news; it was all of television. Only CBS and NBC ranked higher.

Fox News’s biggest stars, meanwhile, are staying put. Ms. Ingraham revealed a new multiyear contract in December, and Mr. Carlson and Mr. Hannity are also on long-term deals, according to a person with knowledge of the network’s inner workings. For all of the hype over Newsmax, its ratings have fallen back from postelection highs.

And if Mr. Murdoch ever feels the need to distance himself more formally from Mr. Trump, he has other platforms on which to do so. In November, another Murdoch organ, The New York Post, proclaimed Mr. Biden’s victory in a cheery front page. After this week’s Capitol riots, the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal made a case for Mr. Trump to resign.

Mr. Murdoch and his son Lachlan, who is the executive chairman of the Fox Corporation, had no comment, a representative said.

Trump TV, which could have posed a significant challenge for Fox News in 2021, now appears less of a threat. Industry experts say the reputational damage that Mr. Trump sustained in the wake of the riots — and his abandonment by allies and donors — has severely hurt his ability to get a viable Fox News competitor off the ground.

“This has not been a positive note,” said Christopher Ruddy, a confidant of Mr. Trump and the chief executive of Newsmax.

Starting a new network requires approval from cable distributors like Charter Communications and Comcast (which Mr. Trump has gleefully denounced as “Concast”), corporations that could face intense public pressure not to associate with Mr. Trump after his presidency.

Even digital news outlets, like the websites created by the former Fox News stars Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck, need help from mainstream tech companies that may now balk at any association with the Trump brand.

“The prospects are now greatly diminished,” said Christopher Balfe, a conservative media consultant who has built digital platforms for stars like Mr. Beck and Megyn Kelly. “You’ve got a real distribution problem. And now that Facebook and Twitter have taken action, they’ve opened the door to a broader de-platforming.”

As for a traditional TV network, Mr. Balfe said cable carriers “weren’t interested before Nov. 6, and they’re certainly not interested in taking anything from him after Jan. 6.”

Still, some television veterans say that Mr. Trump’s millions of supporters could sustain a media outlet regardless of corporate qualms.

“There will always be some entity that’s willing to make a buck by hosting their service,” said Jonathan Klein, a former president of CNN.

Mr. Klein pointed out that Comcast and other cable distributors carry Newsmax and One America News “despite the fictions they’ve been perpetrating.” He added, regretfully, that the violent events at the Capitol could even function as a launchpad for a niche media outlet catering to an audience eager to hear more from Mr. Trump.

“He might have thought of it,” Mr. Klein said, “as his greatest kickoff event.”

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kik2dagroin
Mar 23, 2007

Use the anger. Use it.

BiggerBoat posted:

From USPOL
:tinfoil: Hell, a state actor like China, Russia, or even Iran could host, develop, and maintain the platform on behalf of Trump as a way to put the kibosh on the US Empire. Regardless of who hosts it, I think what we've seen with the Twitter ban and migration to Parler/Gab/Telegram is that it would absolutely be used as a vector to coordinate domestic terrorism in the US. His followers don't care about any hypocrisy in this scenario, they are 100% all aboard the Trump Train.

The computer toucher in me would marvel at the clusterfuck that would be the launching of a Trump 24/7 platform while also being absolutely horrified that there is any market for it after Jan 6th. :sigh:

Happy New Year, goons! :shepface:

Rip Testes
Jan 29, 2004

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception.
https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/1348599278877470721

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
OH poo poo, CONSEQUENCES! SHUT UP GUYS NO MORE.

Yeah they can go gently caress themselves sideways with a rusty cactus. If the coup had been successful they'd be tongue-bathing the new Fuhrer's taint.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


I've never listened to AM radio but had to take a drive with one of our executives to fix his PC at home. That's all he listens to and I can see how people become zombies it's an alternate reality. This was shortly after the election and every caller was talking about how it was obviously stolen - it's funny the NPC meme was the right's favorite because they all sounded the same. They all had a script they had to angrily get through.

Twelve by Pies
May 4, 2012

Again a very likpatous story
I was curious who falls under Cumulus Media, from a quick google search the only three names I can find definitively are Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin and Dan Bongino.

I sort of feel like Mark Levin will pull a "I will not let the truth be silenced!" move and force them to fire him, he can probably get picked up elsewhere, but I doubt the other two could.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Course my local Limbaugh ripoff, the first call in compares it to the reichstag fire saying its a false flag.

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

Are any other right wing media darlings getting the boot from Twitter of FB? Among many other things I'm a bit frosted by the fact that these people trot out the ludicrous line that ANTIFA DID IT!

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
whats the name of that other giant regressive media network that was buying up and writing scipts for local TV news stations, Clear something???

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

PhazonLink posted:

whats the name of that other giant regressive media network that was buying up and writing scipts for local TV news stations, Clear something???

clearchannel but I think they were bought out by sinclair

Space Gopher
Jul 31, 2006

BLITHERING IDIOT AND HARDCORE DURIAN APOLOGIST. LET ME TELL YOU WHY THIS SHIT DON'T STINK EVEN THOUGH WE ALL KNOW IT DOES BECAUSE I'M SUPER CULTURED.

PhazonLink posted:

whats the name of that other giant regressive media network that was buying up and writing scipts for local TV news stations, Clear something???

You're probably thinking of Sinclair Broadcast Group.

iHeartMedia, formerly ClearChannel, is generic corporate radio. They're garbage but it's impersonal big-business evil instead of Trumpy movement conservatism.

e:

Despera posted:

clearchannel but I think they were bought out by sinclair

Nah, iHeartMedia is its own company, and they're pretty different from Sinclair.

The Sinclair vision of media is a bunch of market-specific Fox Newsish TV anchor teams, charismatic and friendly local figures, all offering correct thought and praise to Jesus and Trump every night. Like Fox News, they're a far-right political organization that sells ads to pay the bills.

The ClearChannel/iHeartMedia vision is one guy at an old computer in a cheap city, putting together a handful of music playlists that will be broadcast out over every single iHeartMedia transmitter across the country, with at least 50% of airtime going towards advertisements. Like almost every other corporate radio group, they're an advertising company that plays music to get you to listen to the ads. Taking open political stances might cut into the number of listeners and reduce the almighty revenue line.

Space Gopher fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Jan 12, 2021

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

Zwabu posted:

Are any other right wing media darlings getting the boot from Twitter of FB? Among many other things I'm a bit frosted by the fact that these people trot out the ludicrous line that ANTIFA DID IT!

Imagine being Babbitt dying for the cause and being called Antifa

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

Space Gopher posted:

You're probably thinking of Sinclair Broadcast Group.
Yeah, Sinclair was this:

https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/980175772206993409

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
ah thanks for the super cut.


Space Gopher posted:

You're probably thinking of Sinclair Broadcast Group.

iHeartMedia, formerly ClearChannel, is generic corporate radio. They're garbage but it's impersonal big-business evil instead of Trumpy movement conservatism.


mmmmmmm yeah no that super cut has a lot of classic regressive tropes.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Twelve by Pies posted:

In the interest of hating myself I looked to see what Rush was up to on Friday.


Just an absolute load of poo poo. "We try to persuade them" my rear end. He literally loving said that liberals and conservatives cannot coexist and have nothing in common.

Don't forget all those years of calling Chelsea Clinton a dog.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
got on the line wish me luck

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


I'm glad Rush found a horrible way to die. Always worried he'd OD or something. It's nice knowing he'll be suffering until his last day.

PhazonLink posted:

mmmmmmm yeah no that super cut has a lot of classic regressive tropes.

That supercut is Sinclair not iHeartradio

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

PhazonLink posted:

ah thanks for the super cut.



mmmmmmm yeah no that super cut has a lot of classic regressive tropes.

The super cut is Sinclair. iHeartMedia/Clear Channel is a different corporation (though after they sold off all their TV channels Sinclair bought some)

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
they asked if i was on drugs oh well

kik2dagroin
Mar 23, 2007

Use the anger. Use it.

quote:

RUSH: Yeah, we were up for about three months there on Twitter. Let’s see. October, November… Yeah, 3-1/2 months, and I know a lot of you were very, very upset with me when we went on Twitter officially. We had a couple of Twitter accounts out there. We didn’t use ’em much. But it was all part of revving and up gearing up for a big push.

Folks, I gave this last year everything I’ve got. I don’t want to get too much more into it, but believe me: I gave this last year everything I had. I didn’t take one minute of personal time away from this program. When I was gone, it was medical. You know, doing the Twitter thing was part of the all-out effort to give everything that I and we had to the election effort last year, 2020.

So the three months, 3-1/2 months of being on Twitter? We gave it a shot. We gave it a shot. We did what we could, as did a whole lot of other people.
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2021/01/11/the-media-melted-down-when-i-deleted-my-twitter-account/
Hopefully this portends his imminent demise.

Keep in mind that through this one Limbaugh is basing his entire context of the Twitter ban from an article written by a conservative rag. The author in this piece purposefully only quotes two Trump tweets and then goes "if you look at these two specific tweets instead of everything leading up to the what happened at the Capitol this is clear evidence that Big Tech hates conservatives". Limbaugh is basing his entire rant on just this article. Incredibly disingenuous and lazy, but this is par for the course.

quote:

RUSH: So what does Twitter think that Trump tweeted that constitutes the risk of further incitement of violence? Now, “because this is rarely done by any of the social media platforms when they ban someone,” they never explain it. They just ban ’em. But in Trump’s case, they felt it necessary to explain why they had to ban his account because you might be inspired to blow things up. “Twitter identified two tweets made by the president on January 8 that resulted in their decision to ban him.”

Here’s tweet number one. Are you Ready? Are you listening? Dadelut, dadelut, dadelut, dadelut. “The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

That tweet is considered by Twitter, by the American left, an incitement to violence.
...
Do you believe this? Well, yeah, you do because I’m telling you. I’m reading to you exactly what Twitter has explained, as to why they banned Trump’s account. “Finally, Twitter claims ‘plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off Twitter’…” They have? Wow. Somehow, according to Twitter, this is linked to Trump and his “offending” remarks.

Then Facebook comes along and “also released a statement on January 7 explaining their deplatforming of the president.” They go on to explain Instagram and all the others. So that is the sum of it, and in the midst of all this you still — ladies and gentlemen, you still — can’t fine any B-roll, you can’t find any direct roll. You cannot find the Drive-By Media replaying for you elements of Trump’s speech that incited the violence in the Capitol.

You can’t find it. Nobody is making Trump’s speech to illustrate how he incited the attack. They’re just telling you that he did. In fact, if you look at the text of Trump’s speech, there’s only the one mention of people going to the Capitol Building to protest. It came near the end. Trump said as part of his wrap-up, “I know everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building. To peacefully, patriotically make your voices heard.”

Now, see, Twitter says “patriotically” is code word for violence. Why do you think they think this? I’ll tell you why. ‘Cause they’re a bunch of ignoramuses, and they have a scant, surface history of the American founding and so to them the Tea Party people were patriots, and what’d they do? Well, they threw tea in the harbor. “Well, that’s violence!” Against who? The precious British government!

...
Trump even said “peacefully.”

Somehow, that’s gonna be interpreted as code for violence. So now people are calling Trump a murderer, saying that he needs to be impeached and removed from the presidency so that he can never run for office again. All because of a speech in which he incited nothing, ’cause they’re not replaying it. So telling people to be peaceful is now a dog whistle?

Let me ask this question, folks. The fair test, the fair test to determine if Trump incited violence: What if a Democrat said what Trump said? Would that Democrat be blamed for what followed? No. Well, then how…? If a Democrat would not be accused of inciting violence using the same lingo that Trump used, then how can Trump be accused of? (Snort!) Look, these are rhetorical questions, folks. Don’t think I don’t know the answer.

I’m just illustrating something here. See, the Democrats have said and done far worse than what Trump said in this speech of his. They have planned and incited violence. They’ve bailed out rioters. They oversaw and promoted violence all of last summer in their own states and cities. But Trump has to be painted as a clear and present danger to get election fraud out of the news.

That ought to be the number one story today, but it’s nowhere near. Impeachment? That’s a gift on a silver platter to the media. They get to run with impeachment to fill time. It’s better than talking about what has outraged millions of his Americans, and that is election fraud. Now, they got the help of social media — a false native that Trump is dangerous, is promoting violence. They get to muzzle conservatives everywhere as a result.
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2021/01/11/what-trump-supposedly-said-to-incite-violence/
:qq: Why won't the media consider all the times that Democrats made an insurrection :qq:

Twelve by Pies
May 4, 2012

Again a very likpatous story

quote:

Trump even said “peacefully.”

Guys Trump called for peacefully overthrowing the US government you can't blame him for what happened.

But yeah it's the same disingenuous weasel poo poo the right always pulls. "These Congresspeople are traitors! They're destroying the country! They're trying to screw you because they think you'll sit there and take it! They're stealing the election and America will burn if you let them!"

*people attempt to stop Congress by force*

"Whoa hey I never called for any violence against Congress! I can't believe anyone would imply that I had anything to do with what happened! I don't know where they got the idea they should attempt a coup but it certainly wasn't from me!"

Aramis
Sep 22, 2009



It's even stupider than that.

The right-wing spehere has been calling any and all Trump rally "peacefull protests" as a sort of magic incantation that gives them a free pass to ignore local Covid rules.

It's practically a reflex they've developped over the last few months. "Oh we are talking about a gathering of people, so we better namedrop 'Peaceful protest' every other minute."

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

Twelve by Pies posted:

I was curious who falls under Cumulus Media, from a quick google search the only three names I can find definitively are Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin and Dan Bongino.

I sort of feel like Mark Levin will pull a "I will not let the truth be silenced!" move and force them to fire him, he can probably get picked up elsewhere, but I doubt the other two could.

The truth here is actually so much sweeter. He opened the show basking in the attention he was getting from mainstream outlets. He then said, "I will not be silenced." After that he pivoted into, "Nothing else can be done. The results have been certified. The next battle is in 2 years or 4 years."

He bent the loving knee and it continues to be hilarious. He's bent the knee so many times it's a comedy routine at this point.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

See, this cherry picking poo poo is what's so dangerous.

About 30-40% of the country just sits around and WAITS to be told what to think about anything. I'd bet good money that a larger percentage of goon watched Trump's entire speech last week than Limbaugh listeners. I bet we read more of his tweets. These people like to receive their news through a filter. A lot of people do but I've found it always comes as a surprise to my conservative coworkers when I tell them I think CNN and MSNBC suck and that I don't pay much attention to them. Or that I dislike Nancy Pelosi and didn't want Biden as my nominee.

It's just never for the reasons they think it is.

Rush intentionally aired that sentence about "peacefully marching up to the Capitol" and intentionally left out ALL the other "these fuckers are stealing your country, don't be weak and the clock is ticking" poo poo. They'll do it in reverse too and play something Obama said like "you didn't build that" devoid of context and it suddenly becomes an RNC slogan.

This is how RWM works

Corporate mainstream media is often guilty of the same poo poo but it's nothing like what Kik2dagroin posts regularly. Hannity and FOX & Friends have had a direct pipeline to the White House for 4 years specifically because they let Trump's bullshit air unchallenged. Conservatives think that this is what Anderson Cooper and Chris Hayes do and that Bill Maher or Jon Stewart are just like Tucker Carlson. It's always projection and accusing the other side of what you, yourself, are doing.

Look at McConnell's bald faced lie about the $2000 stimulus being "socialism for the rich" when the rich were specifically excluded from receiving it. But half the country doesn't even know that. They just hear "well of course Mitch hates socialism"

TL/DR: I wish Limbaugh would shut up and die from cancer already

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

This is the frustrating thing to me, too, that getting their news through the RWM filter lets them believe stuff that's easily disproven.

Access Hollywood/"Locker Room Talk" is a prime example. I'll bet the majority of these Trump worshippers have STILL never heard that recording in its entirety. And it's fine with them, because... they don't really WANT to hear it.

GOP voters are like the wife who being cheated on who doesn't WANT to ask what the phone numbers in the jacket pocket, the unfamiliar lipstick on the collar, the strange text that he just got, are all about. It would disrupt their comfortable situation. They know deep down inside but they don't WANT to know.

I just posted on another forum about how there hasn't been any real briefing in a week about the attack from Trump, DoD, FBI etc. and the immediate response from one of the resident RW trolls was "terrorist attack? Looked like a false flag to me!", and I responded posting the 90 minute "As It Happened" Youtube, asked them to watch that and tell me how it was Antifa, and also challenged them to respond to my original post about the lack of any kind of briefing implying all those high levels are either complicit or non functioning and out of comission. Crickets.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Zwabu posted:


I just posted on another forum about how there hasn't been any real briefing in a week about the attack from Trump, DoD, FBI etc. and the immediate response from one of the resident RW trolls was "terrorist attack? Looked like a false flag to me!", and I responded posting the 90 minute "As It Happened" Youtube, asked them to watch that and tell me how it was Antifa, and also challenged them to respond to my original post about the lack of any kind of briefing implying all those high levels are either complicit or non functioning and out of comission. Crickets.

Did they watch it?

I've also seen some selectively edited video of the insurrection with "looks peaceful to ME!" comments.

And I don't think that "filter" can really be emphasized enough. Remember how shocked people were at the 1st Biden/Trump debate? Many people had legit never seen Donald behave that way. Then again, that was mainly the detached folks, not the conservative "I only watch FOX and listen to Rush" types. Those people get a steady diet of "get a load of what Pelosi said" while flat just ignoring people like McConnell or Steve King.

Like, even on 1/6, I mostly just watched RW livestreams so don't loving tell me false flag, media bias and how it was Antifa. I saw it happen unedited. Is it Antifa planning all the armed protests in all 5 states?

poo poo, just go read the freep thread if you want an unfiltered look at what these morons think. You can TELL what they absorb and where they get their information.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Zwabu posted:


GOP voters are like the wife who being cheated on who doesn't WANT to ask what the phone numbers in the jacket pocket, the unfamiliar lipstick on the collar, the strange text that he just got, are all about. It would disrupt their comfortable situation. They know deep down inside but they don't WANT to know.


I think they're also like the MLM "Independent Business Owners" who keep dry humping that poo poo years after running themselves broke because they've been taught to isolate themselves from friends and family (dream stealers), any news or media (liars) and to ONLY listen to their upline (who love and believe in them) and other people in the business if they want to be successful. They're heavily republican and conservative and the techniques are similar across the board (only trust us).

Not making any money? Work harder, you're lazy, too negative, etc. It's certainly not by design to enrich the Amway corporation or anything. That's crazy talk.

Or that TV preacher that says if you only send 20 more dollars, you'll be rich and your cancer will go away. He'd never lie because he's a man of god, you see. You must not have been watching the show hard enough or praying the right way like these thousands of people in this stadium.

Twelve by Pies
May 4, 2012

Again a very likpatous story
And of course Ken Matthews on Rush today was talking about how "People just want to know the truth. It's not about what Trump says or does, that's all a distraction, the mainstream media is distracting you from the real issues. If I may talk to the pretend President-Elect Biden, wouldn't you like to show everyone the real voting numbers? Wouldn't you want to hold them up and display them for all to see? But no you have to show the fake numbers to keep people in line."

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

BiggerBoat posted:

Did they watch it?

What do you think?

Of course not.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.
Cross posting from USPOL but listen to these people and tell me who they sound like and where they learn all the poo poo they think they know?


Seriously. This is what all of AM radio sounds like. It's advertising disguised as propaganda - or maybe the other way around. I'll leave it the way I wrote it.

I really need to get to work on my Advertising Thread/OP but it's a really complex subject, at least in my head, but one I absolutely can not shake. Not in a Bill Hicks way but more of a "please disable your ad blocker to first learn about Pepsi, Chevrolet and Viagra before we explain how an insurrection took place in your country" sort of way.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

BiggerBoat posted:

Cross posting from USPOL but listen to these people and tell me who they sound like and where they learn all the poo poo they think they know?


Seriously. This is what all of AM radio sounds like. It's advertising disguised as propaganda - or maybe the other way around. I'll leave it the way I wrote it.

I really need to get to work on my Advertising Thread/OP but it's a really complex subject, at least in my head, but one I absolutely can not shake. Not in a Bill Hicks way but more of a "please disable your ad blocker to first learn about Pepsi, Chevrolet and Viagra before we explain how an insurrection took place in your country" sort of way.

I would love a dedicated ad thread in DND. One of the classes I took for my minor was a 20th Century American Pop Culture class that had a heavy focus on advertising in media, it's fascinating stuff op.

kik2dagroin
Mar 23, 2007

Use the anger. Use it.

BiggerBoat posted:

About 30-40% of the country just sits around and WAITS to be told what to think about anything.
Definitely, but my gut feeling is it's probably higher than that. Everyone is susceptible to propaganda which is why it is so insidious.

Some people overall are just wired that way, some people are lazy, some people have no time to think because they have a whole heap of other stressors put on them by just trying to get by in society.

We've witnessed this so many times over the past few years, typically on a Friday when something incredibly damaging about the Trump administration would drop, and there would be 2-3 days of utter silence. Reporters would point out "well, here are 3 other cases where this exact same thing happened" and you'd have silence on the usual rightwing outlets while they put together a narrative. The weekend interviews would be all over the place, and then on Monday they'd all start to repeat the same poo poo over and over again once skeezy fucks like Frank Luntz have ran through all the focus testing and whatnot to get the most bang for the buck with their lies.

Remember the era leading up to Trump's impeachment? They got loving caught doing it by forwarding talking points to the wrong e-mail address. The right wing was completely flatfooted for a while and it was incredible watching them trying to come up with something. They just posted through it and Trump wriggled his way out of conviction during his impeachment trial.

Look at what mealy mouthed poo poo they're coming up with in the House and Senate for why it's okay if a Republican foments insurrection. "Well, it's so close to the end of his term..." And people go along with it without batting an eye after decades of being indoctrinated about the ideal of America, Democracy, fairness, etc.

This country is such a loving sham and it's open for everyone to see. If I ever have kids and they ask me what it was like to live through this I'll probably collapse into a rage singularity.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Doctor Nutt posted:

I would love a dedicated ad thread in DND. One of the classes I took for my minor was a 20th Century American Pop Culture class that had a heavy focus on advertising in media, it's fascinating stuff op.

I'm working on an OP but get stuck in spider webs of effect and logic. The deeper I go into thinking about it, I realize how much it permeates loving everything we do in this country and that nothing happens without it. So when I begin to write, it kind of spirals and I wind up sounding like lunatic talking to their therapist about black helicopters and poo poo.

*NOW A WORD FROM MY SPONSOR...THIS POST IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY MY DEVIANT ART ACCOUNT AND YOUTUBE CHANNEL...PLEASE LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE TO SEE, READ, HEAR OR EXPERIENCE ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING*

>>>Skip Ad


Several people seem to be into the idea and have experience with the industry so I'll give it a go soon. I just need to write something coherent and on point that strips out at least most of my mental illness issues on the subject that largely view the whole thing as an arms race of sorts.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

kik2dagroin posted:

Definitely, but my gut feeling is it's probably higher than that. Everyone is susceptible to propaganda which is why it is so insidious.

Some people overall are just wired that way, some people are lazy, some people have no time to think because they have a whole heap of other stressors put on them by just trying to get by in society.

And studies have shown that it's incredibly effective even on people who think they're too smart for that poo poo. People like me who go out of their way not to watch commercials and like to think they're above it all. What RWM has managed to do is to turn "news" into a giant commercial that they typically label "entertainment" when they get called out for false reporting.

To my eyes, (and I hope this makes sense) it seems as if they've captured the audience that watches the Super Bowl every year JUST to watch all the ads. Now WHY anyone would do that has always baffled me but it feeds back into itself. The Super Bowl has the most expensive ads because so many people watch the Super Bowl but so many people watch the Super Bowl JUST for the ads and it's one hell of a weird feedback loop that I'm hosed if I can understand.

poo poo: Double post. See? I told you I was nuts about this topic.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Despera posted:

they asked if i was on drugs oh well

Who did you call?
And were you?

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

BiggerBoat posted:

I'm working on an OP but get stuck in spider webs of effect and logic. The deeper I go into thinking about it, I realize how much it permeates loving everything we do in this country and that nothing happens without it. So when I begin to write, it kind of spirals and I wind up sounding like lunatic talking to their therapist about black helicopters and poo poo.

*NOW A WORD FROM MY SPONSOR...THIS POST IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY MY DEVIANT ART ACCOUNT AND YOUTUBE CHANNEL...PLEASE LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE TO SEE, READ, HEAR OR EXPERIENCE ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING*

>>>Skip Ad


Several people seem to be into the idea and have experience with the industry so I'll give it a go soon. I just need to write something coherent and on point that strips out at least most of my mental illness issues on the subject that largely view the whole thing as an arms race of sorts.

Btw, if it helps make you feel more comfortable, the mod team has been discussing trying to encourage more people to post threads in DND without worrying too much about feeling like they have drop a carefully cited research paper in the op. Not to say that as much effort as you want to give isn't appreciated, but it's a great subject for discussion and if you want to come up with a solid few paragraphs that can kick off discussion, that's a great start. You can even edit the op later if you think of absolute must reads that come up.

tl;dr :justpost:

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
The reason people watch the Superbowl for just the ads is that somewhere along the line, it basically turned into a film festival for corporate-produced short films. I share your feelings more generally about the influence of advertising on our culture, but I don't think the Superbowl is a very good example of the harms it can actually cause.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

PT6A posted:

The reason people watch the Superbowl for just the ads is that somewhere along the line, it basically turned into a film festival for corporate-produced short films. I share your feelings more generally about the influence of advertising on our culture, but I don't think the Superbowl is a very good example of the harms it can actually cause.

It's because it's abig cultural event and increasingly people don't care about football but still want to hang out with their friends

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

PT6A posted:

The reason people watch the Superbowl for just the ads is that somewhere along the line, it basically turned into a film festival for corporate-produced short films. I share your feelings more generally about the influence of advertising on our culture, but I don't think the Superbowl is a very good example of the harms it can actually cause.

I was speaking more about the idea that anyone would every willfully subject themselves to a commercial when most normal people spend time avoiding them (channel surfing, DVR, Ad Blockers) like cancer. Nobody likes spam, pop ups, door to door salespeople, robocalls, junk mail or any of that poo poo (or even just regular old commercials when they're trying to watch Big Bang Theory reruns) but for whatever reason a certain subset of people gather round every year to watch The Good Commercials.

And most of them suck just as bad as any other one.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

HootTheOwl posted:

Who did you call?
And were you?

The "Dan Kaplis show" in Colorado and no

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply