Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009



Yo what are those cottonseed hulls doing in there? Are they basically packing material around those explosive pellets, or god forbid shrapnel, is there non-designated explosive mixed in with the hulls and the hulls are for desensitizing or something?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

PittTheElder posted:

I'm thinking of that transition from biplane to monoplane fighters at the tail of the 30s; did "modern" monoplanes (say the Bf-109 or Hawker Hurricane) capable of matching or exceeding the climb rates of the biplanes they replaced?

Curious about the interplay between the need for interceptors and radar developments.

The I-16 had a definite advantage over the CR.32 in the Spanish Civil War. Without checking stats on all the planes, the monoplames should have an advantage on top speed just by virtue of better enginesand less drag. Aircraft like the I-15 or Hawker Hart were outdated and onky saw action in World War 2 proper out of desperation or a lack of anything better.

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

aphid_licker posted:

Yo what are those cottonseed hulls doing in there? Are they basically packing material around those explosive pellets, or god forbid shrapnel, is there non-designated explosive mixed in with the hulls and the hulls are for desensitizing or something?

Packing material

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

PittTheElder posted:

Are the front and back of the weapon as held below what they appear to be? Namely black end caps made of styrofoam? Do those get jettisoned by a gas system, or are you supposed to remove before (non-promotional) use?



Yeah they're polystyrene and get blown off when it's fired.

RE light mortars, from experience using them anything below the 81mm is not really worth it. I always had an 81mm tube assigned when doing anything tricky and you can have rounds on target within a few seconds if there's no deconfliction needed.

In Afghanistan we also had the 60mm which is a good bit of kit, but still needs clear airspace so you may as well get 81mm / 105 involved. The zone (spread of where the rounds land) on 105 makes 81 pretty appealing where all fire missions are danger close.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M6_mortar

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Jobbo_Fett posted:

The I-16 had a definite advantage over the CR.32 in the Spanish Civil War. Without checking stats on all the planes, the monoplames should have an advantage on top speed just by virtue of better enginesand less drag. Aircraft like the I-15 or Hawker Hart were outdated and onky saw action in World War 2 proper out of desperation or a lack of anything better.

Let no-one malign the Swordfish :colbert:

BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe

feedmegin posted:

Let no-one malign the Swordfish :colbert:

Indeed not. The thing is that the Swordfish was effectively replaced by helicopters rather than monoplanes. The likes of the Skua, Barracuda and Avenger had already made it obsolete as a fleet strike aircraft but it had the biplane advantage of being able to lift huge amounts of stuff from very short flight decks at very low speeds in appalling weather conditions. Which is why it lingered for so long on escort carriers, where it could essentially land vertically if the carrier steamed fast into a brisk wind.

Letmebefrank
Oct 9, 2012

Entitled
Some pictures from my local area Facebook group.
Group of Lotta Svärd girls serving on a searchlight battery during the Continuation war in Helsinki. In that time the suburb was basically farmland, but the beach looks still familiar.

quote:

The SA-kuva.fi website contains many pictures of Degerö's “Searchligh Lotta” training in Laajasalo in the Yliskylä fields and around Ilomäki in 1944.

Borrowed from Lotta Svärd's website:

Special training for searchlighs in the summer of 1944

During the Continuation War, an effective air defense had been created around Helsinki, which included several searchlighs. Their job was to locate and illuminate enemy bombers in the dark so the air defense could shoot them. Searchlighs also had a deterrent and glare effect on enemy aircraft.

In the spring of 1944, when several devastating bombings had taken place in Helsinki, the Commander-in-Chief of the Defense Forces decided to supplement Helsinki's air defense with an air surveillance unit made up of Lotta Svärd and other female students. The idea was to free the men from air surveillance, to prevent a possible landing of enemy troops on Helsinki or an attack with parachutes.
In the late spring of 1944, a group of 18-24-year-old university students and recent graduates from Turku, Tampere and Helsinki were invited to Helsinki Stadium. The women only found out about the nature of their future education on the spot. Course participants from southern Finland started searchligh Lotta training at Degerö School, those from the Turku region in Ispoinen and Central and Northern Finns at Tampere at Hyhky Elementary School.

The study included basic education and special education. For special training, women were divided into four groups: searchlight leaders (25), acoustic detection system listeners (30), searchlight Lottas (“light-lotta’s”) (63) and power plant users (“engine lottas’s”) (29).
Lotta trainers appointed by the Lotta Svärd Central Board were responsible for Lotta training and physical education. Otherwise, the training of floodlights was followed by the army model. In addition to searchlight training, the program included military and security training.

Shooting training was provided with miniature rifles and Terni (Carcano M91/38 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcano) rifles. Lotti's military training threatened to be interrupted when the leadership of Lotta Svärd refused to accept the arming of its members. However, the course participants gathered an address in favor of continuing their education. The management of Lotta Svärd and representatives of the Air Force reached an agreement on the matter, after which the training could continue. The special training ended in the final exam.

The general observation of the trainers was that the Lottas learned things better than the soldiers and took better care of the equipment and supplies.

Spotlight “Girl”

Of the specially trained course participants, 149 signed a service commitment. In it, they undertook to serve voluntarily in the position of headlight as long as the martial law required or for at least one year. The Lottie training unit was grouped on the terrain west of Helsinki on July 30, 1944, and the unit officially formed the 14th VH battery “Girl” on August 7, 1944. Accommodation in the terrain was initially military tents and later modest barracks. The unit was operated and under the responsibility of six German 150 cm searchlights (M / 42 AEG) and acoustic ranging devices (M / 42 RRH). They were high-tech, very expensive devices.

Lotat had learned to use searchlighs well. The problem was that the women did not have enough strength to move the equipment. There were no immediate communication links and the training did not include leadership training. Further leadership training was therefore provided to those elected as searchlight leaders.

During the training, the Lottas wore a Lotta uniforms, but while on duty and guard they used ersatz wool (Rayon) uniforms, landing boots, men’s coats and helmets. The small Italian Terni rifle had been given for personal defense, as the Lottas also had to guard their equipment around the clock. The Lottas prepared their own food. The diet was mostly pea soup.

The floodlight “Girl” received counter-warnings and alerts, but did not have to take any real action because there were no more air bombings in Helsinki. There were lighting exercises almost every night. After the ceasefire, the Lottas handed over control responsibilities to the men. The Lottas were relieved of their duties on 30 September 1944.

The closing ceremony of the floodlight was held on 1 October 1944. The commander of the Air Defense Regiment, Colonel Pekka Jokipaltio, was present at the event. The searchlight Lottas founded their own arms association “Daughters of the Regiment”. They were also invited to participate in the activities of the Air Fighters' Association.

Spotlight “In September 1944, the Leppä 5 Searchlight of the “Girl” had codename “Snake”. The floodlight was placed on the northwest side of Helsinki behind Malminkartano on the edge of the field at Kaarela House. Liisa Kaila was the group leader of “Snake”. The team leader had a rank of a sub-sergeant, albeit without insignia. In addition to the searchlight leader, the group included 14 Lottas: a searchlight deputy leader, two height adjusters, two lampholders, a side adjuster, two side look-outs, two engine-Lottas, a listener (for the acoustic detection system), high-listener, side-listener and “adjuster”. In the picture, the searchlight leader Kaila receives a report from the guarding air defence Lotta.



Nice glasses


Big lamp






Battery


Time off

https://imgur.com/a/olI69Gx

Letmebefrank fucked around with this message at 11:17 on Apr 17, 2021

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

What was the process that damaged planes and tanks had to go through in the 20th century to get repaired and eventually put back into service? How much repairs could they make at a carrier, and did they ever have to send planes back to a more equipped station to get better repairs? Would tank repairs involve hauling it back to some kind of depot?

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

SlothfulCobra posted:

What was the process that damaged planes and tanks had to go through in the 20th century to get repaired and eventually put back into service? How much repairs could they make at a carrier, and did they ever have to send planes back to a more equipped station to get better repairs? Would tank repairs involve hauling it back to some kind of depot?

For planes, it depends on the damage. Simple bullet holes would get covered up by metal with the use of rivets. Large holes would require replacing entire panels. Additionally, you have to check internal structure parts in case a fuel tank, radio, cable, etc is hit and replace as needed. Carriers have workshops to do such repairs, with the caveat that extensive damage that may require too many parts would simply see the plane tossed overboard.

For tanks its a similar thing. If the extent of the damage against the armor isn't too bad, they would simply plug the hole or add armor to the damaged section. If the damage was too great, or at a critical joint, it would go back for repairs. Tanks would go to a unit/regional depot, whereas rebuilds or extensive damage would go back to the factory.

Airfields, like carrier, or forward depots, would be able to work om planaes based on the equipment available. Dirt/forwadd airfields typically having less space for workshops, or simply less access to the required resources.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
This is only very tangentially related to milhist but it feels good to post about it somewhere: it's getting close to the anniversary of my grandmother getting liberated from a concentration camp by the RKKA, and also close to the first anniversary of her loving dying from covid. It sucks and I miss her. She was a little jewish girl who got dragged out of Strasbourg when the nazis invaded and spent years of her childhood in Ravensbrück. She wasn't perfect but she didn't deserve that and the nazis can suck my entire rear end in a top hat.

Da zdravstvuyet geroi Raboche-Krepostnaya Krasnaya Armiya.

Greggster
Aug 14, 2010
Would mortars be of any use as a more direct weapon in a pinch, or is there something to the physics of the mortar shells that requires them to fire in that high arc?

Unreal_One
Aug 18, 2010

Now you know how I don't like to use the sit-down gun, but this morning we just don't have time for mucking about.

Greggster posted:

Would mortars be of any use as a more direct weapon in a pinch, or is there something to the physics of the mortar shells that requires them to fire in that high arc?

Gun-mortars are that exact thing. But for normal mortars, the only reason it wouldn't work in direct fire I can think of is if a fuse has a time of flight or similar safety, or if the firing pin was fixed like the M2. Even assuming the fuse and priming are amenable, most mortars have a muzzle velocity of like Mach 0.5, so you'd have a ton of muzzle drop in a direct fire role, and would be difficult to aim.

Unreal_One fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Apr 18, 2021

Biffmotron
Jan 12, 2007

Not any kind of actual mortar operator, but I think it can be done except that the mounts are completely wrong for direct fire, so you have to be strong enough to free wield it. SOG Medic by Joe Parner has a bit where one of the guys uses a 60mm mortar this way as a personal weapon, which I thought was a tall tale except the following page has a photo of the guy hipfiring it. The M19 has a trigger, rather than being only drop fired, which makes this possible.

Edit: Can't remember and certainly can't prove the guy ever went on a mission with this loadout.

Similarly, Swift boats had an over/under .50 caliber machine gun and 81mm mortar on a rear mount, which could either be used for traditional indirect fire or as a combined direct fire weapon with shorter range. I don't think any other vehicle mounted an 81mm mortar in the same way.

Biffmotron fucked around with this message at 03:31 on Apr 18, 2021

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Greggster posted:

Would mortars be of any use as a more direct weapon in a pinch, or is there something to the physics of the mortar shells that requires them to fire in that high arc?

The Chinese forces in ww2 liked to use US-supplied 60mm mortars at short ranges but they did this so that they could self-spot more than anything else.

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant
I might be misremembering a Forgotten Weapons video but I think the knee mortar could be used in direct fire?

FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.

Panzeh posted:

The Chinese forces in ww2 liked to use US-supplied 60mm mortars at short ranges but they did this so that they could self-spot more than anything else.

Still extremely common at least in the marines. 60s are at the company level and often direct lay, if the terrain is open enough.

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

Greggster posted:

Would mortars be of any use as a more direct weapon in a pinch, or is there something to the physics of the mortar shells that requires them to fire in that high arc?

Typically the mortar shell itself would be thrown in a pinch if its against a target that was within throwing distance. Fuzes are typically just impact, so you wouldn't have a specific time or delay to them. The bigger issue is if you can get the mortar to angle down low enough to be able to do so. As mentioned above, the Knee Mortar could do it, but that's also because its a rather small weapon and fires a smaller mortar round then, say, an 81mm. From a quick search, the mortars I looked at had an elevation around 40-45 degrees at their lowest, and while you can reduce distance by using few(er) ignition cartridges, there will still be limitations to the distance you can get out of them.

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

StandardVC10 posted:

I might be misremembering a Forgotten Weapons video but I think the knee mortar could be used in direct fire?

yes, if they were held against eg. a tree

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
The AMOS mortar system has 2x 120mm barrels and yes, they can also be employed for direct fire. Probably not desirable in real life as the system's entire point is to be able to shoot on the move so you'll be long gone before counter-battery barrage arrives, but possible.


cursed image:

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ
It doesn't fit on the Aerogavin, so it's completely useless.

Polyakov
Mar 22, 2012


Point the turret backwards, fit wings and see what a true aerogavin looks like.

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?
Mike Sparks will never go away. His love for the M113 is so strong it will manifest itself long after his physical form has turned to dust

Pryor on Fire
May 14, 2013

they don't know all alien abduction experiences can be explained by people thinking saving private ryan was a documentary

Direct fire mortars are easy to assemble with minimal tools so you see them in almost every insurgency along with simple blowback submachine guns.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_Newry_mortar_attack

Not quite as innovative as the food tin shaped charge but they worked... sometimes.

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/10/13/iras-recoilless-improvised-grenade-launcher/

Pryor on Fire fucked around with this message at 13:51 on Apr 18, 2021

Arbite
Nov 4, 2009






Very interesting, thank you.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

Jobbo_Fett posted:

Typically the mortar shell itself would be thrown in a pinch if its against a target that was within throwing distance. Fuzes are typically just impact, so you wouldn't have a specific time or delay to them. The bigger issue is if you can get the mortar to angle down low enough to be able to do so. As mentioned above, the Knee Mortar could do it, but that's also because its a rather small weapon and fires a smaller mortar round then, say, an 81mm. From a quick search, the mortars I looked at had an elevation around 40-45 degrees at their lowest, and while you can reduce distance by using few(er) ignition cartridges, there will still be limitations to the distance you can get out of them.

Modern fuzes, even basic PD ones, do have an arming delay. But idk really about using mortars in direct fire role, you'd need to be in a pretty hosed up situation.

Ensign Expendable
Nov 11, 2008

Lager beer is proof that god loves us
Pillbug
Tiger II predecessors

Queue: Pz.Kpfw.IV Ausf.H-J,IS-6, SU-101/SU-102/Uralmash-1, Centurion Mk.I, SU-100 front line impressions, IS-2 front line impressions, Myths of Soviet tank building: early Great Patriotic War, Influence of the T-34 on German tank building, Medium Tank T25, Heavy Tank T26/T26E1/T26E3, Career of Harry Knox, GMC M36, Geschützwagen Tiger für 17cm K72 (Sf), Early Early Soviet tank development (MS-1, AN Teplokhod), Career of Semyon Aleksandrovich Ginzburg, AT-1, Object 140, SU-76 frontline impressions, Creation of the IS-3, IS-6, SU-5, Myths of Soviet tank building: 1943-44, IS-2 post-war modifications, Myths of Soviet tank building: end of the Great Patriotic War, Medium Tank T6, RPG-1, Lahti L-39, American tank building plans post-war, German tanks for 1946, HMC M7 Priest, GMC M12, GMC M40/M43, ISU-152, AMR 35 ZT, Soviet post-war tank building plans, T-100Y and SU-14-1, Object 430, Pz.Kpfw.35(t), T-60 tanks in combat, SU-76M modernizations, Panhard 178, 15 cm sFH 13/1 (Sf), 43M Zrínyi, Medium Tank M46, Modernization of the M48 to the M60 standard, German tank building trends at the end of WW2, Pz.Kpfw.III/IV, E-50 and E-75 development, Pre-war and early war British tank building, BT-7M/A-8 trials, Jagdtiger suspension, Light Tank T37, Light Tank T41, T-26-6 (SU-26), Voroshilovets tractor trials.


Available for request (others' articles):

:ussr:
Shashmurin's career
T-55 underwater driving equipment
T-64's composite armour

:godwin:
Oerlikon and Solothurn anti-tank rifles
Evolution of German tank observation devices

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry
World War 2 Data

Continuing with the technical manual on Soviet Satellite states, we have a rather short section for East Germany. Sadly, there's not much info on individual rounds, but it is still interesting as a point of view of what they thought East Germany was equipped with at the time.

fish and chips and dip
Feb 17, 2010
President of Chad Idriss Déby was killed when leading troops in battle against rebels in northern Chad.

https://www.theafricareport.com/81373/chad-president-idriss-deby-dies-says-national-radio/

My question is; before Déby, who was the last head of state (king, president, dictator, whatever) of a recognized, sovereign territory who was killed in battle? The only I could find was El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed in 1976 from Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (unrecognized state) and a bunch of medieval kings.

Edited for clarity.

fish and chips and dip fucked around with this message at 13:45 on Apr 20, 2021

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

fish and chips and dip posted:

President of Chad Idriss Déby was killed when leading troops in battle against rebels in northern Chad.

https://www.theafricareport.com/81373/chad-president-idriss-deby-dies-says-national-radio/

My question is; who was the last head of state (king, president, dictator, whatever) of a recognized, sovereign territory who was killed in battle? The only I could find was El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed in 1976 from Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, a unrecognized state, or a bunch of medieval kings.

He died in battle or was taken into the bush and offed by the army.

HannibalBarca
Sep 11, 2016

History shows, again and again, how nature points out the folly of man.
Accidents can happen.

glynnenstein
Feb 18, 2014


HannibalBarca posted:

Accidents can happen.

They're especially common for presidents in the first few hours after winning elections.

fish and chips and dip
Feb 17, 2010
While not totally impossible, people I've talked to who know the situation in Chad better than I do told me that the president was popular within the military so it seems unlikely that he was offed by his own, but who knows?

I'm still curious about which state leader was the last one killed in combat before this if anyone knows.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

fish and chips and dip posted:

I'm still curious about which state leader was the last one killed in combat before this if anyone knows.

Are we counting Salvador Allende?

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?

fish and chips and dip posted:

My question is; before Déby, who was the last head of state (king, president, dictator, whatever) of a recognized, sovereign territory who was killed in battle? The only I could find was El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed in 1976 from Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (unrecognized state) and a bunch of medieval kings.

Gadaffi if that counts? Captured live on camera hiding in a sewer tunnel after a short fight, and killed a few minutes later in the back of a truck.

wesleywillis
Dec 30, 2016

SUCK A MALE CAMEL'S DICK WITH MIRACLE WHIP!!

fish and chips and dip posted:

President of Chad Idriss Déby was killed when leading troops in battle against rebels in northern Chad.

https://www.theafricareport.com/81373/chad-president-idriss-deby-dies-says-national-radio/

My question is; before Déby, who was the last head of state (king, president, dictator, whatever) of a recognized, sovereign territory who was killed in battle? The only I could find was El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed in 1976 from Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (unrecognized state) and a bunch of medieval kings.

Edited for clarity.

I hear the motto of the Chadian army is: viens à moi mon frère

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

glynnenstein posted:

They're especially common for presidents in the first few hours after winning elections.

It was his sixth term, he'd been in power since 1990 and it was "elections". This is Chad, not some virgin democracy!

Also the article says he didn't literally die in combat, he was wounded and was flown into the capital where he perished.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Here's one, what's the stupidest way a head-of-state or monarch has died in combat

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

All kinds of Medieval kings died of dysentery while on campaign.

Valtonen
May 13, 2014

Tanks still suck but you don't gotta hand it to the Axis either.

zoux posted:

Here's one, what's the stupidest way a head-of-state or monarch has died in combat

I would propably look at some Roman emperors, all sorts of pretorian guard related shenanigans there. Also the one dude who got himself cut by a Syrian auxiliary archer whilst taking a piss at the roadside.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Cessna posted:

All kinds of Medieval kings died of dysentery while on campaign.

RIP Henry V

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply