Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22
There's a pretty neat and clear Fata Morgana illusion in that ship sinking tweet.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pyromancer
Apr 29, 2011

This man must look upon the fire, smell of it, warm his hands by it, stare into its heart

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Doesn’t look like an admission of an American bioweapons lab programme running in Ukraine, which you implied.

Does Ukraine have their own labs there? Most likely, but I’m not sure if that is something to be surprised about, or to take for a smoking gun of weapons development.

They're not any ~biological research labs~, those ones are working in collaboration with The U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program
https://ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/kyiv/sections-offices/defense-threat-reduction-office/biological-threat-reduction-program/
So they probably have some nasty virus samples in them, even if they have nothing to do with bioweapons program. Remember Powell's anthrax vial WMD? That's just a cattle disease, could as well be in those labs too.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Vahakyla posted:

Really cool and all but what does this have to do with the matter at hand: Russian tanks coming down the streets of a people wanting to be free?

Nothing? I was addressing the claim that being anti-war was the same as being a "tankie"

Charlotte Hornets
Dec 30, 2011

by Fritz the Horse

KitConstantine posted:

Ukrainian Navy confirmed that they sank a russian boat. Different name though - the Ivan Bykov rather than Vasily Bykov.
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1501580160046448644?t=_VbnEivlgNdAYv-JNY6kkQ&s=19

Russians may not admit it though. Third tweet in the thread:

:lol:

The guy tweeting this news can't even get the name right. It's Vasily Bykov in the article that he is referring to not Ivan.

PerilPastry
Oct 10, 2012

FishBulbia posted:

NATO will step in if Russia attacks a NATO country. That's it. They're not going to unilaterally declare war on Russia in response to an invasion of a non-ally.
This is true. Every action and statement put out by NATO confirms that their chief aim is to ensure the war does not spread beyond Ukraine to involve member nations.

alex314 posted:

That's a good point. Russia is well within their power to take all the land between Donetsk and Odesa in the next couple weeks and entrench themselves, then retreat from Kiyv and Kharkiv and just go "well, gently caress you, we're not moving, want to stop hostilities for good or we're going North/South Korea route?"
Maybe as a plan B? Isn't the consensus among military analysts that they're going after Kiyv and are planning on going full Aleppo on it if Zelensky doesn't come to the negotiation table hat in hand?

Baronash
Feb 29, 2012

So what do you want to be called?
I have been similarly unimpressed (as a member) with the DSA's position that sanctions are universally bad considering there is literally a BDS working group in the DSA.

That's what you get when your org opposes demcent I guess.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

His Divine Shadow posted:

Good reasons for countries to support domestic agriculture in order to be less reliant on external food sources.

Yeah I guess all the poor countries that are about to starve due to the war and sanctions should just magically transform their entire system of agriculture overnight to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

mustard_tiger
Nov 8, 2010

KitConstantine posted:

:nws: Russians appear to have deliberately targeted a children's and maternity hospital in Mariupol. Video of aftermath only, no apparent injuries, but video shows civilians walking through bombed out area
https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/1501573144808759296?t=mT3ZAYxf1bQaj7jNECUU1Q&s=19
:nws:

Crater from one of the bombs on the grounds


People have to understand that Russia is known for targeting hospitals. They have used UN hospital lists in Syria as a target list of exactly what to bomb. This is nothing new.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010

PerilPastry posted:

Maybe as a plan B? Isn't the consensus among military analysts that they're going after Kiyv and are planning on going full Aleppo on it if Zelensky doesn't come to the negotiation table hat in hand?

I'm not sure Russian leadership has accepted Plan B yet, because it means the end of the grand geopolitical goal getting the band back together. It's realistic, but we're going to see some bloody attempts to beat Kyiv and Kharkiv into submission at the very least.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




alex314 posted:

Not much modern USSR based SAM systems in EE left. I guess some countries could spare missiles, but we're talking issues of national security there. It's not like they can replace the missiles locally, or ask China for some OTC analogues. If Poland sends SA-6 and SA-8 then there's no short-range air defense left. It's not like with USA that has a fuckton of Patriots to go around.

Actually, US is deploying 2 Patriot systems to Poland…

alex314 posted:

They sacked the dude that was vocally for the invasion, and officially support their staff that works from Ukraine. Also gave some money to charity working there. I see no reason to avoid them.

Man, it’s like Dota but with literal and proverbial tankies. There are some very real reasons to avoid it, that I may or may not confirm from personal experience.

mrfart
May 26, 2004

Dear diary, today I
became a captain.

Fray posted:

Am I the only one thinking that SAM systems and drones would be of much better use to Ukraine than jets that carry heavy support requirements and are harder to hide from missile attack.

I was thinking the same thing.
How many turkish drones, SAM systems can you get for the money/ground crew you need to have these migs in the air?
And it seems to be politically a lot less dangerous and has less risk of pulling NATO into the war?

alex314
Nov 22, 2007

PerilPastry posted:

This is true. Every action and statement put out by NATO confirms that their chief aim is to ensure the war does not spread beyond Ukraine to involve member nations.

Maybe as a plan B? Isn't the consensus among military analysts that they're going after Kiyv and are planning on going full Aleppo on it if Zelensky doesn't come to the negotiation table hat in hand?

Yeah, but it was always drilled that Soviet military will flow the forces where there's least resistance, and so far it looks like southern push is the most successful one. Establishing Novorossiya was one of the original goals of 2014 invasion, and it looks like the only goal that's within reasonable reach.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

FishBulbia posted:

That's not possible without attacking Belarus and Russia. S-400s have a 400km range.

Against what, at what aspect, in what terrain, at what altitude?

Can we stop with the breathless copy/pasting of Russian ad copy from Wikipedia like there isn't a billion factors that go into that number, not even counting the "Russia may be full of poo poo about it's capabilities given recent operational performance" angle.

Just because the frictionless sphere model has a theoretical max range of 400km if fired in perfect conditions against something with the RCS of a 737 doesn't mean we just draw a 400km exclusion zone around them.

If we're taking MIC press releases at face value the US also claims an S400 can't detect an F35 outside of 20NM.

Jarmak fucked around with this message at 17:29 on Mar 9, 2022

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

KitConstantine posted:

Ukrainian Navy confirmed that they sank a russian boat. Different name though - the Ivan Bykov rather than Vasily Bykov.
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1501580160046448644?t=_VbnEivlgNdAYv-JNY6kkQ&s=19

Russians may not admit it though. Third tweet in the thread:

:lol:

Awesome tactic if true, yet another data point on how stupid and incompetent the Russians are. It's almost like there's some evolutionary force that drives towards democratic freedom, because you can't be an autocrat without corruption, and corruption saps your military capability.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Ola posted:

It's almost like there's some evolutionary force that drives towards democratic freedom, because you can't be an autocrat without corruption, and corruption saps your military capability.

Victor Davis Hanson, is that you?

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Jarmak posted:

Against what, at what aspect, in what terrain, at what altitude?

Can we stop with the breathless copy/pasting of Russian ad copy from Wikipedia like there isn't a billion factors that go into that number, not even counting the "Russia may be full of poo poo about it's capabilities given recent operational performance" angle.

Just because the frictionless sphere model has a theoretical max range of 400km if fired in perfect conditions against something with the RCS of a 737 doesn't mean we just draw a 400km exclusion zone around them.

If we're taking MIC press releases at face value the US also claims an S400 can't detect an F35 outside of 20NM.

https://twitter.com/DanLamothe/status/1501281167210856449?t=zsNvGHu-P8D0Qlp1ZrLNBA&s=09

A "NFZ" isn't a real thing being considered by policy makers. It's mainly being pushed by fake news accounts.

FishBulbia fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Mar 9, 2022

There Bias Two
Jan 13, 2009
I'm not a good person

Ola posted:

Awesome tactic if true, yet another data point on how stupid and incompetent the Russians are. It's almost like there's some evolutionary force that drives towards democratic freedom, because you can't be an autocrat without corruption, and corruption saps your military capability.

I think this sort of assertion of a selective pressure towards democracy is somewhat dangerous, because it paints them as an inevitable outcome.

Upgrade
Jun 19, 2021



People are angry at the DSA because of their first statement which didn’t mention Russia once and entirely blamed NATO. They’ve walked it back quite a bit.

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Video showing the sheer scale of the bombardment of Kharkiv :stare:
https://twitter.com/EliotHiggins/status/1501587375423692801?t=OSaWWOr-wbyhmUfYqNmcuw&s=19
Somehow still under Ukrainian control

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

even if an S-400 has half that range it could still shoot down NATO planes over Kyiv. I guess NATO could try to maintain the airspace there as long as they accepted that most missions aren't coming back as they are not allowed to hit air defenses.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005


What do you think that context-less tweet you just dumped without any commentary has to do with what I posted?

If that's from the same source I was just reading you left out the context that he's talking about AA missile systems Russia has moved into Ukraine.

So not 400km S400 shots.

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

Upgrade posted:

People are angry at the DSA because of their first statement which didn’t mention Russia once and entirely blamed NATO. They’ve walked it back quite a bit.

Lol, loving assholes.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Upgrade posted:

People are angry at the DSA because of their first statement which didn’t mention Russia once and entirely blamed NATO. They’ve walked it back quite a bit.

I think the last initial in DSA explains this; as American the things I can (ostensibly, imo not really) affect are American (and by extension) NATO decisions. I can’t yell at Russia loud enough to matter one whit. Talking to other Americans and complicating their understanding (in the good way, the way that your job is more complicated than laymen understand it to be) of world events is a good thing, I think,

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

There Bias Two posted:

I think this sort of assertion of a selective pressure towards democracy is somewhat dangerous, because it paints them as an inevitable outcome.

It would feel good for us, not for them, lets put it like that.

Seth Pecksniff
May 27, 2004

can't believe shrek is fucking dead. rip to a real one.

Ola posted:

Awesome tactic if true, yet another data point on how stupid and incompetent the Russians are. It's almost like there's some evolutionary force that drives towards democratic freedom, because you can't be an autocrat without corruption, and corruption saps your military capability.

It depends on how you define autocrat. Would one think that Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great were autocrats? They were certainly one-man shows but they were also supremely talented military commanders who were the heads of some of the greatest armies in history. There may have been some corruption, sure, but that was normally stamped out with impunity because the state was what mattered above all.

Maybe I'm going back too far into history, and apologies if this is a derail. It's that I think it's more apt to think in modern terms I suppose, because corruption is certainly rife in modern autocracies. I think it's less the fact that it's just because autocracies exist doesn't mean that the arc of the political universe tends towards democratic freedom. As we've seen in the last decade, democratic freedom a pretty fragile thing and easily bent and broken by those who would be king. As There Bias Two noted, democracy isn't inevitable for any country. I would argue that it's much easier to slip back into autocracy than it is to create a fundamental charter of freedoms.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Jarmak posted:

What do you think that context-less tweet you just dumped without any commentary has to do with what I posted?

If that's from the same source I was just reading you left out the context that he's talking about AA missile systems Russia has moved into Ukraine.

So not 400km S400 shots.

It's easy to get caught up in the fake news, but a no fly zone isn't a real thing.

establishing air-superiority means destroying AD in Belarus and Russia. This is why NATO has been extremely clear that such stories are fake.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Earlier mentioned but appears now they'll go through with it. No reason to have a cold grill at McD's just sitting there.

https://twitter.com/AlexKhrebet/status/1501573193412366339

Fork of Unknown Origins
Oct 21, 2005
Gotta Herd On?

BigRed0427 posted:

Lol, loving assholes.

For a group that is supposed to be the practical socialists the DSA sure go out of their way to be impractical.

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 hours!

selec posted:

I think the last initial in DSA explains this; as American the things I can (ostensibly, imo not really) affect are American (and by extension) NATO decisions. I can’t yell at Russia loud enough to matter one whit. Talking to other Americans and complicating their understanding (in the good way, the way that your job is more complicated than laymen understand it to be) of world events is a good thing, I think,

This still implies any bit of this was NATOs fault.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




the popes toes posted:

How does one get conscripted in Russia? Is it a lottery?

fool of sound posted:

Yes, lottery of 18 to 27 year old men. They draft twice annually and conscripts serve a year.

Every young male is drafted, there’s no lottery. There only are some exceptions, like if you have a serious medical condition, or a young child, or rich parents.

KitConstantine posted:

Ukrainian Navy confirmed that they sank a russian boat. Different name though - the Ivan Bykov rather than Vasily Bykov.
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1501580160046448644?t=_VbnEivlgNdAYv-JNY6kkQ&s=19

Russians may not admit it though. Third tweet in the thread:

:lol:

There’s no Russian ship called Ivan Bykov. Black Sea Fleet has Vasiliy Bykov, and (a much larger, different type ship) Ivan Khurs.

ZombieLenin
Sep 6, 2009

"Democracy for the insignificant minority, democracy for the rich--that is the democracy of capitalist society." VI Lenin


[/quote]

the popes toes posted:

Earlier mentioned but appears now they'll go through with it. No reason to have a cold grill at McD's just sitting there.

https://twitter.com/AlexKhrebet/status/1501573193412366339

I am all for nationalizations generally speaking, but in this context…

Russia would be doubling down on its global isolation and lack of institutional investment from outside the country for a generation or more.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



the popes toes posted:

Earlier mentioned but appears now they'll go through with it. No reason to have a cold grill at McD's just sitting there.

https://twitter.com/AlexKhrebet/status/1501573193412366339

Once again

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




:siren: Also, please shut up about DSA and take it to USPol. :siren:

Seth Pecksniff
May 27, 2004

can't believe shrek is fucking dead. rip to a real one.

the popes toes posted:

Earlier mentioned but appears now they'll go through with it. No reason to have a cold grill at McD's just sitting there.

https://twitter.com/AlexKhrebet/status/1501573193412366339

Ok, but I ask again, with what money? If you're importing a lot of food, how are you going to keep McDonalds or Starbucks open? It's not like Russia is a great producer of coffee beans (I don't know about beef but I assume they could probably get it from China)

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Seth Pecksniff posted:

It depends on how you define autocrat. Would one think that Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great were autocrats? They were certainly one-man shows but they were also supremely talented military commanders who were the heads of some of the greatest armies in history. There may have been some corruption, sure, but that was normally stamped out with impunity because the state was what mattered above all.

The democracy is militarily superior to autocracy argument usually starts with hero Greeks beating up decadent Persians, which imo shows how it's meant to be a feel good story about Western supremacy as much as it is about democracy vs autocracy.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Every young male is drafted, there’s no lottery. There only are some exceptions, like if you have a serious medical condition, or a young child, or rich parents.

There’s no Russian ship called Ivan Bykov. Black Sea Fleet has Vasiliy Bykov, and (a much larger, different type ship) Ivan Khurs.

This ship has been burning over the horizon of Odessa for a few days at least. Initially people thought it was a tanker that got hit. My guess is its either that or one of the small swift boat like craft that both Ukr and Ru have in the black sea.

Postorder Trollet89
Jan 12, 2008
Sweden doesn't do religion. But if they did, it would probably be the best religion in the world.

Vahakyla posted:

Really cool and all but what does this have to do with the matter at hand: Russian tanks coming down the streets of a people wanting to be free?

I'd say thats our job (EU) and not yours. Being to dependant on you is what put us in this mess in the first place.

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

As far as international intervention goes, I think we've seen all there's going to be short of a massive world ending escalation.

Western arms and intel will flow into Ukraine, sanctions will continue to be added in every possible way people can think of, but all the big stuff is basically done already.

It's now just a case of seeing what actual impact it has over a longer time frame. Can Ukraine hold on? What state is the Russian military actually in? How quickly will Russia collapse due to sanctions? These are the questions that matter.

"What will the west do next?" isn't really up there.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Phlegmish posted:

Once again



Honestly can't wait to try Russian McDonalds (no relation to American company) in 15 years once this has all blown over

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
https://twitter.com/JominiW/status/1497670934244872199?s=20&t=nD2Y-PlCpbnYIKbejKC3Kw

I haven't cross-verified all of the sources that went into these maps, but these are some good operational maps that seem to largely match OSINT that I've been following. It probably can't be understated how important it is for Ukraine to get reserve formations mobilized and moved to the front as soon as possible.

Putting Ukrainian Foreign Legion forces northwest of Kiev, if accurate, is interesting. When fighting ISIS, the Peshmerga and other Kurdish groups tended to keep Westerners in support roles: they wanted to avoid dead or captured Westerners on media for fear of losing Western popular support. Northwest Kiev will obviously be in the thick of things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5