Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Yeah, RU and UA armies proper don’t release too much footage. Occasional drone or AT missile hits, not much else. Army soldiers proper have been maintaining decent enough opsec on both sides.

Well UA has been maintaining good opec. RU reportedly took everyone's phones when they got to staging. I would assume that if more conscripts had phones we would be see all sorts of war crimes fighting footage.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013
The idea that Russia has NOT taken thousands of KIA is completely ludicrous even if you think they are winning. This is a major force-on-force confrontation between nations with millions of people, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, thousands of tanks, hundreds of aircraft, thousands of artillery pieces.

This is essentially a World War II campaign occurring except with weapons that are an order of magnitude more lethal. Lots of people are dying out there on both sides.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Djarum posted:

Well UA has been maintaining good opec. RU reportedly took everyone's phones when they got to staging. I would assume that if more conscripts had phones we would be see all sorts of war crimes fighting footage.

I don't think they did a particularly good job with taking phones away, given that we were able to track movements of their vehicles via Google Maps traffic jam highlights up until Google disabled that feature for Ukraine.

Charlotte Hornets
Dec 30, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
Sit-rep of the Eastern Front from Igor "Strelkov" Girkin. You know the separatist guy from 2014. Machine translation

quote:

Summary of LDNR:.

Mariupol - fierce street fighting continues. Gradual slow advance of the Armed Forces of the DPR.
The Chechen divisions of the "Russian Guard" are still diligently fulfilling Vladimir Putin's wish to "take care of yourself" and skillfully avoid any participation in real hostilities.

To the west of Volnovakha, the DPR Armed Forces took full control of the village of Stepnoe.
There is a slow advance towards the largest junction of defense and communications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area southwest of Donetsk - Kurakhovo.

In the vicinity of Marinka and Avdeevka, heavy fighting continues without any significant success.

In the area of ​​Popasnaya, Severodonetsk and Lisichansk, the LPR Armed Forces continue to slowly “squeeze out” the enemy.

Fighting continues near Kamenka south of Izyum. The result of the battles is not yet completely clear, but in Slavyansk and Kramatorsk the enemy is urgently preparing to "repeat Volnovakha." Apparently, the enemy is confident in our generals (in their ability to beat their foreheads against the enemy's fortifications to the last surviving own soldier), as in themselves.

From the category of "you won't understand - laugh or cry":

Konstantin Sivkov on "Len-TV" "practically surrounded the Donetsk grouping of the enemy." If such an opinion is shared by former colleagues of K. Sivkov in the General Staff, then I dare to draw the attention of "top professionals" to the fact that in order to justify such a bold statement, the RF Armed Forces need to cut only three more major transport routes connecting "practically surrounded" grouping with their rears:
1. Slavyansk-Barvenkovo-Lozovaya;
2. Gorlovka-Pokrovsk-Pavlograd;
3. Kurakhovo-Pokrovskoe-Zaporozhye.
("Yandex-maps" to help, and if suddenly the General Staff does not know how to use them, he is ready to provide consulting services completely free of charge).
Unfortunately, our units have not yet reached these transport arteries in any sector.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




FYI, https://www.deepl.com/translator is a bit better with machine translations than Google Translate, in my experience. Might be handy for people who don't read Russian, though it doesn't support Ukrainian, unfortunately.

Not saying the translation above is bad, just something I wanted to mention before.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

cinci zoo sniper posted:

FYI, https://www.deepl.com/translator is a bit better with machine translations than Google Translate, in my experience. Might be handy for people who don't read Russian, though it doesn't support Ukrainian, unfortunately.

Not saying the translation above is bad, just something I wanted to mention before.


If it doesn't support Ukraine it's a racist translator

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

deathbysnusnu posted:

Russia is obviously not going to invade Poland, but if they did the Poles alone would be enough to mudstomp them judging by how Ukraine is going. The Eurasia thread on day 2 of the war was talking seriously about how if an open NATO/Russia conflict happened, the Russians would have been seizing German air bases inside a week.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

WTF, how is this "posting about posters" he's just contrasting the consensus from the beginning of the war with the current situation. Bonkers.

Preoptopus
Aug 25, 2008

âрø ÿþûþÑÂúø,
трø ÿþ трø ÿþûþÑÂúø

Is that nu pogodi music lol

Yureina
Apr 28, 2013

Yeap. I found this out recently. Really turns me off the Palestinian cause to find out they basically consist entirely of raging racists.

OctaMurk posted:

The idea that Russia has NOT taken thousands of KIA is completely ludicrous even if you think they are winning. This is a major force-on-force confrontation between nations with millions of people, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, thousands of tanks, hundreds of aircraft, thousands of artillery pieces.

This is essentially a World War II campaign occurring except with weapons that are an order of magnitude more lethal. Lots of people are dying out there on both sides.

By WW2 standards these casualties are actually fairly low. I've not had any trouble believing the numbers that we have been seeing. I guess most of us are more used to seeing the numbers from US wars of the past few decades, but that's from a country that isn't completely incompetent.

Flagellum
Dec 23, 2011

spurdo av master race so what

OctaMurk posted:

The idea that Russia has NOT taken thousands of KIA is completely ludicrous even if you think they are winning. This is a major force-on-force confrontation between nations with millions of people, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, thousands of tanks, hundreds of aircraft, thousands of artillery pieces.

It makes sense if your only source of information is Russian MoD or Twitter accounts with names like 'russians with attitude'.

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Preoptopus posted:

Is that nu pogodi music lol

I admit, I didn't even realize the video had audio.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




steinrokkan posted:

WTF, how is this "posting about posters" he's just contrasting the consensus from the beginning of the war with the current situation. Bonkers.

This is not the thread to post about what Eurasia thread or some other thread is doing. You can make your comparisons without inviting cross-forum drama.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

If it doesn't support Ukraine it's a racist translator

Ok.

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Ynglaur posted:

If they're correct, it's getting close. The USSR was suffering something like 1,000 KIA a day during the Battle of Berlin. The USSR had around 196 million people in 1941. Russia has around 146 million today.

Here's another potential leak, unverified:
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1505961677371621379?s=20&t=XKuMDESwr7fVbyJv-fKRVQ

Here's the thing. Let's say the loss ratio of killed-in-action (KIA) versus wounded-in-action (WIA)in Pravda accurate. Let's then say that half of those wounded return to combat. That would mean 18,631 out of action in 25 days of fighting, or 745/day. Now let's be super-generous and halve that number. Estimates were that Russia had 175-192K in theatre at the start. Let's call it 200K. That's 0.2% of the entire force per day. Can you shove bodies into the breach that fast? Probably. But you can't replace 2,500 soldiers per week without full mobilization (much less 5,000, if we don't halve our numbers).

So we have lots of leaks from Russia in addition to the numbers posted by :ukraine:, and they all paint the same picture: Russia cannot sustain this level of attrition for more than a few months, and they don't seem to be doing anything to stop the bleeding.

It's no wonder they're digging in. Holding tactical defensive positions and shoving as much artillery fire downrange as fast as they can might be the only thing they can do in many places.

Here's an interesting paper with some statistics on killed-in-action (KIA) versus wounded-in-action (WIA). Note that the US has a KIA : WIA rate closer to 1 : 10 rather than the 1 : 1.63 being reported in Pravda. That latter number is staggeringly bad. It basically means if you get wounded, you're probably hosed.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/workingpaper/49837-Casualties_WorkingPaper-2014-08_1.pdf

One final note: we don't have any reason sense of UA casualties, so things could be just as dire for some Ukrainian formations.

Those are some crazy high numbers if correct.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

For those interested in how captured Russian equipment is repurposed for the Ukrainian forces:

Inside the Kyiv junkyard that recycles Russian weapons for Ukrainian forces

quote:

The sound of rockets launching in the distance breaks the silence of an otherwise quiet morning in Kyiv.
"That's us, we're attacking Russian positions close to Hostomel," a Ukrainian soldier says, as the shots fire in a synchronized rhythm.
In this particular instance, the rockets the Ukrainian military is using to target Moscow's invading troops are actually Russian.

"Last night we sent the Ukrainian armed forces 24 Uragan missiles that were on their way here to fly over our cities," says Yuri Golodov, the deputy commander of one of Ukraine's Territorial Forces and a retired seaman from the Ukrainian Navy.

"We captured them intact, gave them to the Armed Forces of Ukraine at night and now the Ukrainian army has fired missiles back at them," Golodov says.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Deteriorata posted:

For those interested in how captured Russian equipment is repurposed for the Ukrainian forces:

Inside the Kyiv junkyard that recycles Russian weapons for Ukrainian forces

The most EE job is a cruise missile recycling center owner operator

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

cinci zoo sniper posted:

I don't think they did a particularly good job with taking phones away, given that we were able to track movements of their vehicles via Google Maps traffic jam highlights up until Google disabled that feature for Ukraine.

Well and the fact that I believe the local telecoms disabled Russian service from their networks so most are out of service in theater. There has been more than one report of RU taking locals phones to make calls presumably because theirs don’t work.

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009

Ynglaur posted:

If they're correct, it's getting close. The USSR was suffering something like 1,000 KIA a day during the Battle of Berlin. The USSR had around 196 million people in 1941. Russia has around 146 million today.

Here's another potential leak, unverified:
https://twitter.com/MrKovalenko/status/1505961677371621379?s=20&t=XKuMDESwr7fVbyJv-fKRVQ

Here's the thing. Let's say the loss ratio of killed-in-action (KIA) versus wounded-in-action (WIA)in Pravda accurate. Let's then say that half of those wounded return to combat. That would mean 18,631 out of action in 25 days of fighting, or 745/day. Now let's be super-generous and halve that number. Estimates were that Russia had 175-192K in theatre at the start. Let's call it 200K. That's 0.2% of the entire force per day. Can you shove bodies into the breach that fast? Probably. But you can't replace 2,500 soldiers per week without full mobilization (much less 5,000, if we don't halve our numbers).

So we have lots of leaks from Russia in addition to the numbers posted by :ukraine:, and they all paint the same picture: Russia cannot sustain this level of attrition for more than a few months, and they don't seem to be doing anything to stop the bleeding.

It's no wonder they're digging in. Holding tactical defensive positions and shoving as much artillery fire downrange as fast as they can might be the only thing they can do in many places.

Here's an interesting paper with some statistics on killed-in-action (KIA) versus wounded-in-action (WIA). Note that the US has a KIA : WIA rate closer to 1 : 10 rather than the 1 : 1.63 being reported in Pravda. That latter number is staggeringly bad. It basically means if you get wounded, you're probably hosed.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/workingpaper/49837-Casualties_WorkingPaper-2014-08_1.pdf

One final note: we don't have any reason sense of UA casualties, so things could be just as dire for some Ukrainian formations.

I looked up on Wikipedia what the casualtie numbers were for the Soviets in the Soviet Afghan war. According to Wiki, it's about 14.5K. that was spread out over a 10 year period. The Russians most likely have already surpassed that number in Ukraine in only about 4 weeks. And the Afghan war is believed by many to have been a contributing factor to the downfall of the Soviet Union.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Charliegrs posted:

I looked up on Wikipedia what the casualtie numbers were for the Soviets in the Soviet Afghan war. According to Wiki, it's about 14.5K. that was spread out over a 10 year period. The Russians most likely have already surpassed that number in Ukraine in only about 4 weeks. And the Afghan war is believed by many to have been a contributing factor to the downfall of the Soviet Union.

Well that was ten years of paying. feeding and supplying an army in the field, along with providing for its massive genocidal operations and large scale "population transfers", also paying for the puppet Afghan government... The sort of stuff that made American occupations also absurdly expensive. Dead recruits, even blown up tanks are cheap in comparison. We'll see how the war develops, but in absence of other stresses, I think a dictatorship can stomach many more bodies without necessarily being pressured into a crisis by that fact alone.

steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 22:50 on Mar 21, 2022

Fragrag
Aug 3, 2007
The Worst Admin Ever bashes You in the head with his banhammer. It is smashed into the body, an unrecognizable mass! You have been struck down.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

I don't think they did a particularly good job with taking phones away, given that we were able to track movements of their vehicles via Google Maps traffic jam highlights up until Google disabled that feature for Ukraine.

I don't think Google Maps detected the traffic jams due to soldier's phones, but rather civilians who were being affected by military movements due to intersections being closed off or routes being shut down

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

Yureina posted:

By WW2 standards these casualties are actually fairly low. I've not had any trouble believing the numbers that we have been seeing. I guess most of us are more used to seeing the numbers from US wars of the past few decades, but that's from a country that isn't completely incompetent.

WWII battles generally had much, much, MUCH larger formations committed to battle.

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

steinrokkan posted:

Well that was ten years of paying. feeding and supplying an army in the field, along with providing for its massive genocidal operations and large scale "population transfers", also paying for the puppet Afghan government... The sort of stuff that made American occupations also absurdly expensive. Dead recruits, even blown up tanks are cheap in comparison. We'll see how the war develops, but in absence of other stresses, I think a dictatorship can stomach many more bodies without necessarily being pressured into a crisis by that fact alone.

Possibly, but of course the meatgrinder isn't the only thing Russia is dealing with. The Soviets went in to Afghanistan after spending decades being economically apart from the West. Russia just got jumped back to that era after a full 30 years of integration with Western economies. Almost every soldier in the field for them has grown up with access to Western amenities that will be gone once/if they return home. Not to mention the various ticking economic timebombs that Russia definitely was not prepared to fend off from those sanctions. I think disinformation is the only thing keeping the Russian government alive at this moment and that has its limits.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


Not going to hold my breath, but Biden is heading over this week to Europe .
https://twitter.com/SamRamani2/status/1506014223108907010?s=20&t=sCvxGH37t41N6neZi3_d2w

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Doccers posted:

Starlink would be my bet.
A couple of stories in the Times and Telegraph have said that Starlink is indeed how.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/specialist-drone-unit-picks-off-invading-forces-as-they-sleep-zlx3dj7bb
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/03/18/elon-musks-starlink-helping-ukraine-win-drone-war/

It was always clear that Starlink would have military / strategic uses. Now every nation will want one!

Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

Yureina posted:

By WW2 standards these casualties are actually fairly low. I've not had any trouble believing the numbers that we have been seeing. I guess most of us are more used to seeing the numbers from US wars of the past few decades, but that's from a country that isn't completely incompetent.

and fighting a foe that has to spend the majority of its resources to procure weapons that can damage anything more than a glorified truck. With total air and armor supremacy.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Shes Not Impressed posted:

Not going to hold my breath, but Biden is heading over this week to Europe .
https://twitter.com/SamRamani2/status/1506014223108907010?s=20&t=sCvxGH37t41N6neZi3_d2w
What were you going to hold your breath over?

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"
Russia has its worst demographics of all time for absorbing mass death of young men. Sources I see online seem to show the average median age of a Russian was 34 in 1990. It's over 40 now.

Surely that has to be something to consider.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

OctaMurk posted:

The idea that Russia has NOT taken thousands of KIA is completely ludicrous even if you think they are winning. This is a major force-on-force confrontation between nations with millions of people, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, thousands of tanks, hundreds of aircraft, thousands of artillery pieces.

This is essentially a World War II campaign occurring except with weapons that are an order of magnitude more lethal. Lots of people are dying out there on both sides.

This just leaked:

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1505972650786672648

Old James
Nov 20, 2003

Wait a sec. I don't know an Old James!


Discussed over the previous couple of pages.

with a rebel yell she QQd
Jan 18, 2007

Villain


I'll just leave this here. Who'd have thought?

https://twitter.com/NoContextVarg/status/1505994351012462596?s=20&t=nJoKZhiirJOqsd7UJ5uldQ

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

William Bear posted:

Russia has its worst demographics of all time for absorbing mass death of young men. Sources I see online seem to show the average median age of a Russian was 34 in 1990. It's over 40 now.

Surely that has to be something to consider.

As large a number as it is I’m not sure it’s a massive % of their young male population. Like it’s obviously not ideal to have lost that many people but it’s not enough to trigger an imminent demographic crisis.

The more pressing issue is that there’s 17,000 or so families and a larger number of other social contacts who have lost a family member/friend in the conflict who might start to ask inconvenient questions like “wtf is going on down there?” and “why?” and “is it worth it?”.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

If there's a way that Varg can be an even bigger piece of human poo poo, it's quicker to assume that he's already figured it out

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




Chalks posted:

Wait

Not that the article was posted as the result of a hack, but they inserted casualty figures into an otherwise legitimate article?

If that's true that's really impressive.

Or Komsomolskaya Pravda accidentally printed the actual figures, then got a phonecall from the FSB, and are now desperately trying to come up with a cover story.

Or they just made up some numbers and are now claiming it was a hack to muddy the waters. How do you, the Russian on the street, know what the true death toll is? All the newspapers are being hacked to exaggerate it!

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

How is he able to live in peace on a French farm again?

busalover
Sep 12, 2020

lol

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

HappyHippo
Nov 19, 2003
Do you have an Air Miles Card?

Lead out in cuffs posted:

Or Komsomolskaya Pravda accidentally printed the actual figures, then got a phonecall from the FSB, and are now desperately trying to come up with a cover story.

Or they just made up some numbers and are now claiming it was a hack to muddy the waters. How do you, the Russian on the street, know what the true death toll is? All the newspapers are being hacked to exaggerate it!

There's no way to know if it's a hack or not. It's certainly the cover story they would use if they accidentally published the real numbers. I would also expect a real hacker would do something with more... flair than this.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1506008584005595136?s=20&t=HP0RIhNMyy2eOyHc1iSjXA

Destroyed T-90. People are theorizing it was destroyed by an APC with smaller autocannon.

Random Integer
Oct 7, 2010

Judakel posted:

Kyiv is starving

https://twitter.com/nolanwpeterson/status/1504861555703353357?s=20&t=QCOKj0mbLKPdk_wb7H_J5g

Victis
Mar 26, 2008

CommieGIR posted:

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1506008584005595136?s=20&t=HP0RIhNMyy2eOyHc1iSjXA

Destroyed T-90. People are theorizing it was destroyed by an APC with smaller autocannon.

Almost looks like a mine, it blew one of the wheels off and there's a big crater all the way across the bottom. Maybe they just thrashed it from both sides. Either way immobilized = dead

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009

I mean this is probably true, but there's kind of no way to tell when and where these pictures were taken.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Canned Sunshine
Nov 20, 2005

CAUTION: POST QUALITY UNDER CONSTRUCTION




While I'd love for that first photo to be true, I'm a little skeptical that it's a photo during the current crisis.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5