Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
Yeah I really don’t think the saudis are going to aid or abet the assassination of the west’s golden boy for the sake of Russia’s corpse

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
I'm not even sure why it's being discussed. Saudi Arabia isn't going kill the head of state of another country while there on a diplomatic meeting there.

That's just full on crazy talk.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/meatgrinder-russian-tactics-second-year-its-invasion-ukraine

RUSI published an excellent short-form analysis of the adaptations the Russian military has made in Ukraine. It's very readable even for laypersons. A few highlights:

  • Russian artillery has become more responsive and more mobile.
  • Russian indirect fires greatly favor 120mm mortars right now. Ynglaur's note: I think mortars are proving their utility again in this war. They're responsive, accurate, and can put a high volume of fire down.
  • The Russian Air Force remaining "in being" continues to be a threat, though it can't penetrate air defenses.
  • Russian headquarters had to move out of GMLRs range, move into hardened structures, and tie into civilian telephone infrastructure.
  • In general, if Ukraine can force Russia into a dynamic environment, Russian forces will likely struggle to put up a coherent defense. Ynglaur's note: I take this to mean that while strong, the Russian military remains brittle. Getting "insider the decision cycle" of Russian commanders will be important.

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?
US to back fighter jet training for Ukrainian pilots, official says

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

Shes Not Impressed posted:

Seems like the crawl toward sending jets to Ukraine is still underway. If a Patriot can shoot down one of Russian's jets over Russian territory, then why not just let Ukrainians do it with American jet?!

This has always been the plan. They wanted Russia to over extend themselves, bleed out while NATO slow walked giving more and more advanced systems to give Ukraine superiority. At the end Russia will be effectively a non-threat going forward, Ukraine gets supplied with modern NATO equipment which they can use with great effect mopping up what is left of the Russian military with little risk which is a great commercial for it all. Also gives some fear to China which they can see what happens with the not so fancy stuff.

The US and UK get to celebrate a big victory in Ukraine and the defeat of the big bad Russians which I know in the mind of a lot of Americans still are the boogyman.

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013
Would you say Russia boogeymanning it up in Europe has something to do with that?

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Djarum posted:

The US and UK get to celebrate a big victory in Ukraine and the defeat of the big bad Russians which I know in the mind of a lot of Americans still are the boogyman.

Can't imagine why a country that invades and brutalizes its neighbors is considered a boogeyman.

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

Vahakyla posted:

Would you say Russia boogeymanning it up in Europe has something to do with that?

No, it is because boomers and to some extent Gen X were raised with insane amounts of propaganda telling them that Russia is going to kill us all at any time. Only Capitalism and God will save you! I am of the age for the very tail end of all that nonsense as the Wall came down soon after I started school, so I only got a small amount of the "nuclear drills" and other bullshit. But I can completely see how that would color your views on this stuff for life.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
I think, in light of the recent unpleasantness, that Russia isn't just a boogeyman.

beer_war
Mar 10, 2005

Russian propagandists are out there every day talking about how they'll nuke that European country or invade that one. Most Europeans would prefer not to be nuked or invaded, regardless of their political or religious views.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

wet_goods posted:

This seems reckless, the Russians have a lot of pull in that region and SA isn’t exactly a good faith actor. Send a delegate next time.

In addition to what others have said I will add that, again, Zelenskiy is on his way to Japan right now and probably needed to stop somewhere in the Middle East so might as well get some diplomacy in. Outside of the US, heads of state don't have their own 747s that can fly nonstop to anywhere on Earth. And that's even before you get into the fact that normally a flight from Europe to Japan would go over Russia.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Djarum posted:

No, it is because boomers and to some extent Gen X were raised with insane amounts of propaganda telling them that Russia is going to kill us all at any time. Only Capitalism and God will save you! I am of the age for the very tail end of all that nonsense as the Wall came down soon after I started school, so I only got a small amount of the "nuclear drills" and other bullshit. But I can completely see how that would color your views on this stuff for life.

To be fair the threat of nuclear annihilation was very real and that piece of it definitely wasn't propaganda.

Even if we didn't square off with each other intentionally there are multiple occasions of hair trigger systems nearly firing and people just generally loving up or misreading the data that they were getting that could have had the entire thing going south.

cr0y fucked around with this message at 18:33 on May 19, 2023

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Moon Slayer posted:

In addition to what others have said I will add that, again, Zelenskiy is on his way to Japan right now and probably needed to stop somewhere in the Middle East so might as well get some diplomacy in. Outside of the US, heads of state don't have their own 747s that can fly nonstop to anywhere on Earth. And that's even before you get into the fact that normally a flight from Europe to Japan would go over Russia.

I mean there are defiantly other ways he can get from Europe to Japan not flying through Russian air space without going though the Middle East, but yeah where ever he stopped he'd probably try a bit of diplomacy so why not. Might not go anyway, but why not try?

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

cr0y posted:

To be fair the threat of nuclear annihilation was very real and that piece of it definitely wasn't propaganda.

Even if we didn't square off with each other intentionally there are multiple occasions of hair trigger systems nearly firing and people just generally loving up or misreading the data that they were getting that could have had the entire thing going south.

Oh I am well aware. But I feel like it is a lot of the active shooter drills they have kids do today. That kind of stuff is going to stick in the minds of people their entire lives. Even if the US somehow got rid of every gun, the generation that grew up with that is going to have an unhealthy fear of guns and active shooters their entire lives.

Not belittling Russia as a threat either. But the level and frankly insanity that was anti-Soviet propaganda that in some forms continues to this day was a little ridiculous.

In Europe where there was a much more real threat I feel took a much more realistic and practical approach to it all.

Alas it is a derail that doesn’t have much to do with the subject at hand.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


beer_war posted:

Russian propagandists are out there every day talking about how they'll nuke that European country or invade that one. Most Europeans would prefer not to be nuked or invaded, regardless of their political or religious views.

They would be a "boogeyman" if it was just talk, but since they are actually trying to conquer one of their neighbors they have advanced to the stage of being an actual threat to the neighborhood.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
The strategy of "boiling the frog" is not being used to "force Russia to overextend itself." It's being used to supply Ukraine with enough equipment to win while avoiding nuclear war. If nuclear weapons weren't a thing, I suspect Europe and the US would have supplied Ukraine with far more, far more quickly. This all also completely ignores the very real difficulties of moving, maintaining, and issuing all of this kit in a manner that is useful to Ukraine.

In other news, I'm seeing some posts about an oopsy accounting error that has US aid to Ukraine over-valued by $3B. I am not an accountant or a US defense procurement specialist, but my intuition says this will be used to fund eventual F-16s for Ukraine. The other thing I consider is that the US tends to announce things as "upcoming" when they're actually ready and even in use. It would not surprise me at all if the US already had Ukrainian pilots in training. My understanding is that Ukraine has more pilots than planes, so this should be doable.

While re-training current pilots (who have lots of recent combat flight time!) should only take weeks or a couple months, I'm curious how long it would take to train new pilots from scratch. Do any goons itt have any expertise in this area?

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Ukraine's getting F-16s
timeline for delivery unclear but not for this counteroffensive

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/us-allies-plan-provide-ukrainian-pilots-f-16-fighter-jets-official-say-rcna85270

quote:

HIROSHIMA, Japan — America and its allies plan to provide F-16s to Ukraine — although the fighter jets may not necessarily come directly from the United States — as part of a long-term effort to strengthen the country's security, a senior Biden administration official said Friday.

The timing for when Ukraine will receive the fighter jets — and which countries will provide them — remains unclear, but the official said the planes would not be used for Ukraine's upcoming counteroffensive against Russia. In the coming months, the U.S. and its allies “will decide when to actually provide jets, how many we will provide, and who will provide them,” the official said. The news comes as President Joe Biden on Friday informed leaders of leading industrialized nations that the U.S. will support efforts to train Ukrainian pilots on F-16s.

“Discussions about improving the Ukrainian air force reflect our long-term commitment to Ukraine’s self-defense," the senior administration official said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly called on the U.S. to provide F-16s, but Biden had so far refused the requests. In February, Biden said in an interview with ABC News that U.S. military advice showed that Ukraine did not need F-16s at the time.

“I’m ruling it out for now,” he had said about sending F-16s to Ukraine.

Officials from France and Poland had previously expressed openness to providing Ukraine with the advanced fighter jets. But any transfer of the American-made planes requires permission from the U.S. government.

News of the decision to provide Ukraine with F-16s comes as Biden attends a Group of Seven summit in Japan.

The U.S. and its allies' joint effort to train Ukrainian pilots on the jets could start in the coming weeks, the official said. The training “will take place outside Ukraine at sites in Europe and will require months to complete," the official continued.

Colin Kahl, the Pentagon's top policy official, previously told Congress that training Ukrainian pilots on F-16s could take “about 18 months.” Other U.S. defense officials have said the training could be shortened to only six to nine months based on pilots' previous training and knowledge of fighter aircraft.

In his appearance before the House Armed Services Committee, Kahl said that it could cost up to $11 billion to revitalize Ukraine's military with F-16 jets. G-7 leaders have not announced who would pay to provide Ukraine with the planes.

In March, NBC News reported that two Ukrainian pilots were in the U.S. undergoing an assessment to determine how long it could take to train them to fly attack aircraft, including F-16s. Washington had also approved bringing up to 10 more Ukrainian pilots to the U.S. for further assessment.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Ynglaur posted:

The strategy of "boiling the frog" is not being used to "force Russia to overextend itself." It's being used to supply Ukraine with enough equipment to win while avoiding nuclear war. If nuclear weapons weren't a thing, I suspect Europe and the US would have supplied Ukraine with far more, far more quickly. This all also completely ignores the very real difficulties of moving, maintaining, and issuing all of this kit in a manner that is useful to Ukraine.

In other news, I'm seeing some posts about an oopsy accounting error that has US aid to Ukraine over-valued by $3B. I am not an accountant or a US defense procurement specialist, but my intuition says this will be used to fund eventual F-16s for Ukraine. The other thing I consider is that the US tends to announce things as "upcoming" when they're actually ready and even in use. It would not surprise me at all if the US already had Ukrainian pilots in training. My understanding is that Ukraine has more pilots than planes, so this should be doable.

While re-training current pilots (who have lots of recent combat flight time!) should only take weeks or a couple months, I'm curious how long it would take to train new pilots from scratch. Do any goons itt have any expertise in this area?

There was a report that said the norma training time is 18 months,.but they can do it with 4 with experienced pilots:

https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/status/1659271091234250752

The problem is of course is that Ukraine doesn't have that many experienced pilots and they do fly actively (and many are dead). Also I can't help but notice it's been over 14 months since the war started, and that 14+4 is 18

Lum_
Jun 5, 2006

dr_rat posted:

I'm not even sure why it's being discussed. Saudi Arabia isn't going kill the head of state of another country while there on a diplomatic meeting there.

That's just full on crazy talk.

It may sound like crazy talk, but MBS previously held the prime minister of Lebanon, Saad Hariri, hostage at gunpoint until he resigned (he un-resigned the moment he left Saudi soil).

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-saad-hariri-mohammed-bin-salman-lebanon.html

MBS then joked about it, with Hariri present, a year later.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/412930-saudi-crown-prince-jokes-about-kidnapping-lebanese-leader/

MBS is not a stable person.

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

Ynglaur posted:

In other news, I'm seeing some posts about an oopsy accounting error that has US aid to Ukraine over-valued by $3B. I am not an accountant or a US defense procurement specialist, but my intuition says this will be used to fund eventual F-16s for Ukraine. The other thing I consider is that the US tends to announce things as "upcoming" when they're actually ready and even in use. It would not surprise me at all if the US already had Ukrainian pilots in training. My understanding is that Ukraine has more pilots than planes, so this should be doable.

While re-training current pilots (who have lots of recent combat flight time!) should only take weeks or a couple months, I'm curious how long it would take to train new pilots from scratch. Do any goons itt have any expertise in this area?

So Ukrainian pilots were training extensively in the US before the war. They have flight hours in both the F-16 and F-15. How many? Well I have never seen anyone say that openly but my guess is somewhere around a lot since there was never a report on Ukrainian airframes ever leaving Ukraine or being spotted in the US during the time frames Ukrainian pilots were known to be in the US training. My assumption is they were using F-16s and 15s as stand ins for the MiG-29 and Su-27 respectively. Which would make a lot of sense.

The issue with supplying Ukraine with F-16s or anything else has never been an issue with pilots. As long as someone is a certified pilot it doesn’t take a long time to teach someone a new airframe. Most of the time spent there is teaching the tactics for an airframe to use it to a pilot’s advantage.

The big issue has always been the ground crew and the logistics chain. Training maintenance crews, weapons loading, crew chief, refuel personal… these folks need to get trained and you need all of the equipment moved into Ukraine. That takes time. You could possibly do it in as little as 6 weeks if there was a rush but I have little doubt that all of this has been being done for awhile now quietly. Just like with every other weapon system that is given to Ukraine that they start using immediately the personal was training on it in secret for weeks if not months prior to it being official.

Family Values
Jun 26, 2007


Djarum posted:

No, it is because boomers and to some extent Gen X were raised with insane amounts of propaganda telling them that Russia is going to kill us all at any time. Only Capitalism and God will save you! I am of the age for the very tail end of all that nonsense as the Wall came down soon after I started school, so I only got a small amount of the "nuclear drills" and other bullshit. But I can completely see how that would color your views on this stuff for life.

As one of said GenXers that went through those fallout drills, no, I'm not afraid of the big bad Russkies. I do however have a strong distaste for autocrats invading their neighbors, doubly so when they're right wing 'traditional values' fascists, triply so when their regime is also trying to destroy liberal democracy in the west.

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

whats the status on more soup though

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Thank God.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

This isn't really related to F-16 news but just to illustrate the point that maintenance is always the bottleneck with fighter jets (and because it's funny in a sad way), the US lost a few F-22s to a hurricane because their maintenance cycles are so long they couldn't get them away in time.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>
Mother nature remains undefeated

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

Lum_ posted:

It may sound like crazy talk, but MBS previously held the prime minister of Lebanon, Saad Hariri, hostage at gunpoint until he resigned (he un-resigned the moment he left Saudi soil).

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-saad-hariri-mohammed-bin-salman-lebanon.html

MBS then joked about it, with Hariri present, a year later.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/412930-saudi-crown-prince-jokes-about-kidnapping-lebanese-leader/

MBS is not a stable person.

Everything you've said is true, but it is also worth adding the context (a) Hariri is also a Saudi citizen, (b) Lebanon is a tiny, failed state in thrall to a bunch of powers, of which KSA is one particularly for the Sunni branch of the government to which Hariri belongs. Anyway quite a derail here, since Zelensky was not arrested in Saudi Arabia and made it to Japan.

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


There’s not a lot of great options for a diplomatic visit on that route either. Where else do you stop? Turkey? Iraq? India? Pakistan?

Zhanism
Apr 1, 2005
Death by Zhanism. So Judged.

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

There’s not a lot of great options for a diplomatic visit on that route either. Where else do you stop? Turkey? Iraq? India? Pakistan?

Gina!

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

There’s not a lot of great options for a diplomatic visit on that route either. Where else do you stop? Turkey? Iraq? India? Pakistan?

Israel. I'm really surprised Zelensky chose to visit SA over Israel. Like yeah, go visit the horrible dictator that also invades it's neighbors over a country that has a defense system (iron dome) that you would probably really like to have defending your cities.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Nm

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Charliegrs posted:

Israel. I'm really surprised Zelensky chose to visit SA over Israel. Like yeah, go visit the horrible dictator that also invades it's neighbors over a country that has a defense system (iron dome) that you would probably really like to have defending your cities.

Israel is not problem free, you know. Israel is led by a corrupt fascist war criminal who is Putin's buddy. Particularly right now there's been both huge protests against the government, and rockets being fired from Gaza and a fear of escalation. Now I don't think Zelensky is worried about any of that, but do you invite guests to your house when it looks like you've been on a bender? Or do you demand to enter when you know it's a mess inside?

I wouldn't expect Netanyahu to give any meaningful support to Ukraine anyway, Israeli politics are so tightly balanced that while Russian immigrants are far from homogenous, the number of people who fully support Putin is probably important enough for him to avoid annoying them. And because he's an utter piece of poo poo

ShadowHawk
Jun 25, 2000

CERTIFIED PRE OWNED TESLA OWNER

Moon Slayer posted:

This isn't really related to F-16 news but just to illustrate the point that maintenance is always the bottleneck with fighter jets (and because it's funny in a sad way), the US lost a few F-22s to a hurricane because their maintenance cycles are so long they couldn't get them away in time.
It looks like Hurricane Michael damaged as many as 17 F-22s, making it technically qualify as a fighter ace.

Yureina
Apr 28, 2013

Yeap. I found this out recently. Really turns me off the Palestinian cause to find out they basically consist entirely of raging racists.

Tiny Timbs posted:

Somehow I don't think MBS is going to flush a president backed by the US down a basement drain

He might be able to get away with chopping up a journalist, but I doubt he would be able to get away with murdering another nation's leader.


Good, but they should have started this a year ago.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Yureina posted:

Good, but they should have started this a year ago.

I believe someone else mentioned it, but given that the expected training time is about a year shorter than average... it's possible they did, in fact, start this a year ago. Sshhh, don't tell anyone!

Yureina
Apr 28, 2013

Yeap. I found this out recently. Really turns me off the Palestinian cause to find out they basically consist entirely of raging racists.

PT6A posted:

I believe someone else mentioned it, but given that the expected training time is about a year shorter than average... it's possible they did, in fact, start this a year ago. Sshhh, don't tell anyone!

I would hope so. The "west" really should be doing more to help give Ukraine an edge over the Russians. The more damage that can be done to Russia now, the longer it will take for them to recover and try this sort of BS again... assuming they will be able to recover.

Groggy nard
Aug 6, 2013

How does into botes?

Yureina posted:

I would hope so. The "west" really should be doing more to help give Ukraine an edge over the Russians. The more damage that can be done to Russia now, the longer it will take for them to recover and try this sort of BS again... assuming they will be able to recover.

The last time Russia rebuilt, it was rebuilt from western companies, all of which appear to have left Russia for some reason!

CatHorse
Jan 5, 2008

Charliegrs posted:

Israel. I'm really surprised Zelensky chose to visit SA over Israel. Like yeah, go visit the horrible dictator that also invades it's neighbors over a country that has a defense system (iron dome) that you would probably really like to have defending your cities.

SA helped with POW exchange and promised 400 million $. And Israel has shown no interest in giving any military aid.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

If you ever seen footage from Stugna launches and saw arabic on its screen (or, better yet, from trainer software where operator tries to hit not-Merkavas) then you shouldn't be surprised why Zelensky tries to make inroads with different countries.

mrfart
May 26, 2004

Dear diary, today I
became a captain.

Charliegrs posted:

Israel. I'm really surprised Zelensky chose to visit SA over Israel. Like yeah, go visit the horrible dictator that also invades it's neighbors over a country that has a defense system (iron dome) that you would probably really like to have defending your cities.

I assume visiting SA is a lot about the pull they have in the ME and African countries, who at best are indifferent about the outcome of this war and just want the grain export to go back to normal. Visiting Israel would look very different from their point of view.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






https://twitter.com/nlwartracker/status/1659863843135275008


Seems like Bakhmut has finally been given up by the Ukrainians.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply